Op donderdag 21-02-2008 om 11:37 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Klaus
Bitto:
> Actually, I've never seen any keybord with the text "start" on Super L
> (or R).
> It's always the windows logo.
> (I've seen a single one with tux on there, though!)
Cherry has more than one model with Tux on it.
What
>
>
> Similarly, Super L says "Start" on it 99% of the time (number pulled from
> thin air, but can't be far off!).
Actually, I've never seen any keybord with the text "start" on Super L (or
R).
It's always the windows logo.
(I've seen a single one with tux on there, though!)
--
ubuntu-desktop m
I think you are looking at this from a completely unnecessary and, frankly,
foolish perspective.
Microsoft's Windows renders GUI applications into different blocks
(windows), each with their own externally controlled Close, Minimize and
Maximize buttons. The fact is, people expect this and it is an
Have you ever seen the disbelief on Windows users faces when you tell
them there aren't any viruses for Linux? They're so used to it, they
think it's completely natural for an operating system to have viruses.
But it's not. The question isn't why Ubuntu doesn't have the same
default keyboard shortc
> It doesn't take more than five minutes to learn how to configure keyboard
> shortcuts, but
> it must be learned.
Why should it need to be learned?
Why make it hard for new users if we can easily pre-map a key to the
application menu?
--
Add function to WinKey button on keyboard
https://bugs.
I don't see the problem. This is easily configured using Keyboard
shortcuts. This is not Windows, and users should not expect things to be
the same. In Ubuntu, you can choose the button yourself, in Windows you
cannot. You just have to learn how to use the system. It doesn't take
more than five min
Here is a good reason to make it so: Discoverability!
People often come to Ubuntu and wonder "where the Start menu is". If
they could press the Super key ("Start") and have something appear, that
would mean they quickly learn what Ubuntu has instead. People must think
outside of the anti-Windows t