Sebastien Bacher writes:
> Hey there,
>
> Following https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Developers Amin Bandali
> applied for ubuntu-desktop membership and got +1 from three team
> members:
>
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-desktop/2023-November/006339.html
>
Hey there,
Following https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Developers Amin Bandali
applied for ubuntu-desktop membership and got +1 from three team members:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-desktop/2023-November/006339.html
+1 from me.
I have worked with Amin on the Canonical Desktop team. Amin has worked
beyond his core job responsibility of maintaining Firefox to also help
maintain many of the Ubuntu Desktop packages in Ubuntu. He gained some
experience from working on a poppler transition recently and has done
Hey Amin,
+1 from me for you ubuntu-desktop applications. The desktop uploads you
recently worked on and that I've recently reviewed were high quality.
You have been working on a variety of packages in the desktop set,
handled transitions and are familiar with the Ubuntu processes (freezes,
This is a big +1 from me, Amin has been doing a great job looking
after firefox. I haven't sponsored any of his deb packaging work, but
his snap work has been excellent! I have been impressed with Amin's
methodical approach to the snap maintenance and his ability to keep up
with the aggressive
Hello,
I would like to be considered for membership in the ubuntu-desktop team.
I've been part of Canonical's Desktop team for about a year now, where
I've been the primary maintainer of Ubuntu's Firefox deb and snap
packages. I became an Ubuntu Contributing Developer earlier this year
and have
On 2023-08-31 11:22, TJ wrote:
On 30/08/2023 10:32, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
On 2023-07-14 17:13, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
On 2023-07-13 09:37, TJ wrote:
Could you consider including the visually-impaired friendly
Atkinson Hyperlegible Font?
https://brailleinstitute.org/freefont
To me it
TJ,
On 2023-07-14 17:13, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
On 2023-07-13 09:37, TJ wrote:
Could you consider including the visually-impaired friendly
Atkinson Hyperlegible Font?
https://brailleinstitute.org/freefont
To me it looks like a reasonable font to make selectable in Ubuntu.
But before that
I tested with the latest daily build ISO for Ubuntu (from yesterday, at
17 UTC). Now, if you select the Sinhala language in the installer, the
"Sinhala (wijesekera) (m17n))" input method is included in the list of
active input sources by default. It can be choosen either from the input
source
On 2021-09-16 01:02, Steve Langasek wrote:
Thanks for this insight! Based on the original post, it seems to me that we
SHOULD retain ibus-m17n for Sinhala. Is this table in gnome-settings-daemon
what ensures that it's retained? It's unclear to me how that works,
gnome-settings-daemon is not
On 2021-09-15 21:32, Steve Langasek wrote:
In Ubuntu, the wijesekera keyboard is provided by the ibus-m17n
package, which I find included by default in Ubuntu 21.04 as well as
in Ubuntu 20.04.
While ibus-m17n is present on the Ubuntu desktop ISO, it does not stay
after the installation is
On 2021-08-18 03:37, Daniel van Vugt wrote:
On 17/8/21 9:15 pm, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
On 2021-08-17 07:15, Ubuntu Documentation Contributors wrote:
Hello Ubuntu Desktop,
Brian Thompson (debbriant) wants to be a member of Ubuntu
Documentation Contributors (ubuntu-doc-contributors), but
It's because we have groups as members of other groups :/
~ubuntu-core-doc is a member of ~ubuntu-doc-contributors
~ubuntu-desktop is a member of ~ubuntu-core-doc
On 17/8/21 9:15 pm, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
On 2021-08-17 07:15, Ubuntu Documentation Contributors wrote:
Hello Ubuntu
On 2021-08-17 07:15, Ubuntu Documentation Contributors wrote:
Hello Ubuntu Desktop,
Brian Thompson (debbriant) wants to be a member of Ubuntu Documentation
Contributors (ubuntu-doc-contributors), but this is a moderated team, so
that membership has to be approved. You can approve, decline or
Hello Ubuntu Desktop,
Brian Thompson (debbriant) wants to be a member of Ubuntu Documentation
Contributors (ubuntu-doc-contributors), but this is a moderated team, so
that membership has to be approved. You can approve, decline or leave
it as proposed by following the link below.
William Wilson has proposed merging
~jawn-smith/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings:gpio-udev-rules into
~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings:master.
Requested reviews:
Dave Jones (waveform)
For more details, see:
Did you try on the live session or an installed system? What's the out
put of
$ snap list
?
Le 30/11/2020 à 12:13, Marco Buschini a écrit :
> Hello,
> I used the desktop image found on Ubuntu website from scratch, empty
> disks. I typed software in the dash and Ubuntu Software did not
> appear.
Hello,
I used the desktop image found on Ubuntu website from scratch, empty disks.
I typed software in the dash and Ubuntu Software did not appear. I had to
fire up bash and install it by hand. The same goes for Gnome Software.
Il lun 30 nov 2020, 11:43 Sebastien Bacher ha scritto:
> Hey Marco,
Hey Marco,
That's weird, snap store is installed by default on 20.10. Which image
did you use exactly and how did you check ubuntu software was missing?
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
Le 29/11/2020 à 16:10, Marco Buschini a écrit :
> Hello,
> yesterday I performed a fresh install of Ubuntu 20.10. I
Hello,
yesterday I performed a fresh install of Ubuntu 20.10. I noticed that the
tools Ubuntu Software, and Gnome Software (both used to install software
from the desktop interface) were missing in the installed image. I
installed them myself, but this is something that will hinder Ubuntu's
This bug was fixed in the package linux-riscv - 5.8.0-3.3
---
linux-riscv (5.8.0-3.3) groovy; urgency=medium
* groovy/linux-riscv: 5.8.0-3.3 -proposed tracker (LP: #189)
* Miscellaneous Ubuntu changes
- [Config] update config for CONFIG_VGACON_SOFT_SCROLLBACK
[
Why are we looking at focal now? The change to systemd only happened
after the opening of groovy.
Data is tricky. There are a ton of different cpufreq drivers that are
affected, and they all have different behavior. pstates alone has
different behavior on newer intels that do pstates in hardware
@colin-king with or without additional measurements default to
performance and relying on userspace to switch to ondemand at some later
point during boot is wrong. It means we are risking melting laptops and
catching fire. I.e. boot machine, walk away, it sits in the initrd at
the LUKS unlock
For example, the measurements on the X220 do not reflect situation on
modern Intel systems, as they scale differently from Skylake and newer,
as they do not have HWP.
A CPU with HWP (hardware P-states) behaves as you'd expect sort of - it
runs at close to max frequency all the time, and scales
@Dimitry: Are we not safe on 20.04 because the "ondemand" systemd
service is still there and will switch to "ondemand" CPU freq governor
after boot?
This service has been removed in systemd 245.5-1. Are there plan to
backport this to 20.04.2?
--
You received this bug notification because you
@julian Ubuntu Desktop in 20.04.2 will receive the 20.10's kernel by
default and thus will adopt the 20.10 default. Imho the linux-generic
(ga) kernel should also be updated to the same default, to make it the
same across -generic, -hwe, -oem kernel flavours in 20.04. Because in
20.04, defaulting
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Hello!
Regarding the comment #8, I didn't get the same positive experience on
my side. It was more closer to what is described in comment #9. See bug
1889479 for more details.
I would suggest switching back to powersave/ondemand either with a new
service or the kernel config. Having a dedicated
I've added the OEM Solutions Group team for awareness. I'm not sure what
the final fix will be since servers' and desktops'/laptops' ideal
default seem to be different, but most likely the certification tests
should be adjusted if we don't end up restoring the previous behaviour
of the
> In benchmarking we didn't observe much computational difference
between the too once the CPU is fully loaded. However, cranking up or
cranking down the load one will discover that the performance setting is
more responsive than powersave.
this is exactly the problem in production environments;
> I would suggest switching back to powersave/ondemand either with a new
service or the kernel config.
re: new service, the existing package cpufrequtils (and related package
cpufreqd) provides a configurable service to manage governor settings
(and other related settings). The old ondemand
passing intel_pstate=disable_hwp on the kernel commandline causes the
kernel to scale the Core i5-8250U down to 1.6 GHz in performance mode,
but that's still a bit off from the 900 MHz it scales down to in
powersave mode.
I believe Windows also does not run the CPUs in performance mode by
default
@colin-king @juliank
It feels to me that the oem flavour should default to
(powersave/ondemand), as it is more-or-less laptop kernel flavour.
I feel like generic kernel flavour should remain on performance.
I feel like we should have a unit, that for chassis=laptop turns on
The choice was made from running analysis on a wide range of Intel
machines, old and new. We are trying to select the optimal choice for a
wide range of CPUs for a wide range of use cases. Generally speaking,
the intel-pstate governor has deeper understanding of the processor
features and can
@Colin: I agree with all of that.
Our kernel-side default is not powersave, but performance, across
generic and oem, at the very least:
$ grep CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_.*=y /boot/config-5.*
/boot/config-5.4.0-26-generic:CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFORMANCE=y
Hello Ubuntu Desktop,
Esme Xuan Lim (hayashiesme) wants to be a member of Ubuntu Documentation
Contributors (ubuntu-doc-contributors), but this is a moderated team, so
that membership has to be approved. You can approve, decline or leave
it as proposed by following the link below.
Le 16/06/2020 à 18:37, Gunnar Hjalmarsson a écrit :
> Maybe, if we keep the patch, I should simply hide the upstream docs
> page which refers to Tweaks in order to avoid confusion.
Right, if we provide the feature by default there is no point to refer
to tweaks...
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
--
On 2020-06-16 18:06, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Le 16/06/2020 à 05:43, Gunnar Hjalmarsson a écrit :
To make maintenance easier, we should probably drop the patch.
OTOH, the UI and related docs for Startup Applications is installed
by default.
The patch/application has been pretty low
Hey Gunnar,
Le 16/06/2020 à 05:43, Gunnar Hjalmarsson a écrit :
> To make maintenance easier, we should probably drop the patch. OTOH,
> the UI and related docs for Startup Applications is installed by default.
The patch/application has been pretty low maintainance and as you say we
don't
Hi all!
Take a look at these doc pages:
https://help.ubuntu.com/stable/ubuntu-help/shell-apps-auto-start.html
(Tweaks)
https://help.ubuntu.com/stable/ubuntu-help/startup-applications.html
(revert_remove_gnome_session_properties.patch)
Both work, but having two such UIs with related docs
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Network-
manager, which is subscribed to NetworkManager.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:15:59AM -0400, Ken VanDine wrote:
> +1 from me. Marco has done great work over the years and well deserving of
> membership.
In [1]: lp.people['ubuntu-desktop'].addMember(person=lp.people['3v1n0'])
Out[1]: [True, u'Approved']
In [2]:
+1 from me too!
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
--
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
+1 from me. Marco has done great work over the years and well deserving of
membership.
Thanks for all that you do!
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 7:07 AM Iain Lane wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 02:49:42PM +0100, Marco Trevisan wrote:
> > I've waited some long time before applying, cause I'm not
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 02:49:42PM +0100, Marco Trevisan wrote:
> I've waited some long time before applying, cause I'm not in love with
> formalities, but I feel like I'm part of this team since some years now,
> even without dput-powers :).
+1 from me. Thanks for all the work over the years,
THe update should be part of GNOME 3.36.1 which is due this weekend
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868116
Title:
QEMU monitor no longer works
To manage notifications
Hey Marco,
You have been a solid contributor to the desktop packages for some
years. You clearly know your way around packaging and understand the
processes involved (and I would say you have been better recently at
respecting them ;-).
+1 from me to add you to the team, keep up the good work!
Thanks.
Indeed it was copy/paste error. It isn't used anywhere in unity. I actually
forgot to open mr for my branch
(https://code.launchpad.net/~khurshid-alam/unity-settings-daemon/lp-1868391).
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~laney/unity-settings-daemon/drop-gnome-schema/+merge/381186
Your
Iain Lane has proposed merging
lp:~laney/unity-settings-daemon/drop-gnome-schema into lp:unity-settings-daemon.
Commit message:
Stop shipping a GNOME schema
This is probably not used by anything, but I'll rename it instead of just
dropping - a unity-settings-daemon maintainer could drop after
The proposal to merge lp:~laney/unity-settings-daemon/drop-gnome-schema into
lp:unity-settings-daemon has been updated.
Status: Needs review => Approved
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~laney/unity-settings-daemon/drop-gnome-schema/+merge/381186
--
Your team Unity
The proposal to merge lp:~laney/unity-settings-daemon/drop-gnome-schema into
lp:unity-settings-daemon has been updated.
Commit message changed to:
Stop shipping a GNOME schema
This is probably not used by anything, but I'll rename it instead of just
dropping - a unity-settings-daemon
Can you propose that please? If we can drop it we should.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~laney/unity-settings-daemon/drop-gnome-schema/+merge/381186
Your team Unity Settings Daemon Development Team is requested to review the
proposed merge of lp:~laney/unity-settings-daemon/drop-gnome-schema
Hi desktoppers,
I've been around here for some years, previously working in
unity-desktop and maintaining also the packaging side of it, (generally
for unity and bamf [1]), and more recently handling the packaging for
the gnome-shell stack (mutter [2], shell [3], but I also contributed to
mozjs,
We finally moved all our git branches and tags for our GNOME desktop
packages to debian salsa.
So please don't push anything to launchpad git branches for any gnome
package (let me know if I missed any of them).
All the people in the desktop team, should be added to a salsa team, so
make sure
Untargetting for Bionic, SRUing the current version failed since it
changed DNS behaviour in some configuration which created issue for
existing users. There isn't anyone currently working on resolving those
issues so it's more realistic to untarget from Bionic.
If the problem really needs to be
** No longer affects: network-manager (Ubuntu Bionic)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Network-
manager, which is subscribed to NetworkManager.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942856
Title:
NetworkManager does not support AES-encrypted private keys for WPA
Khurshid Alam has proposed merging
lp:~khurshid-alam/unity-settings-daemon/usd-schemas-focal into
lp:unity-settings-daemon.
Commit message:
* Port rest of the schemas gnome-settings-daemon-common to
com.canonical.unity.settings-daemon. LP: #1842324
* When upstream moved persistant
Khurshid Alam has proposed merging
lp:~khurshid-alam/unity-settings-daemon/usd-schemas-focal into
lp:unity-settings-daemon.
Commit message:
* Port rest of the schemas gnome-settings-daemon-common to
com.canonical.unity.settings-daemon. LP: #1842324
* When upstream moved persistant
Review: Disapprove
Rejecting, as discussed changing the setting wouldn't resolve the
inconsistency, it would still be impossible to interact with elements under the
dialog but it would be more confusing because the UI wouldn't communicate that
clearly anymore
--
The proposal to merge ~flexiondotorg/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings:master into
~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings:master has been updated.
Status: Needs review => Rejected
For more details, see:
The proposal to merge lp:~khurshid-alam/unity-control-center/drop-gnomebg into
lp:unity-control-center has been updated.
Description changed to:
Note it must be compiled against new unity-settings-daemon in
GJS version we depend on is at
https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/gjs/+git/gjs/+ref/ubuntu/master
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+git/gnome-shell/+merge/379843
Your team Ubuntu Desktop is requested to review the proposed merge of
The proposal to merge lp:~khurshid-alam/unity-settings-daemon/fix-build-focal
into lp:unity-settings-daemon has been updated.
Status: Needs review => Approved
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~khurshid-alam/unity-settings-daemon/fix-build-focal/+merge/379919
--
Your team
Since this is merged I fixed the build here.
https://code.launchpad.net/~khurshid-alam/unity-settings-daemon/fix-build-focal/+merge/379919
It is compiling locally for me along with unity and unity-control-center.
But in proposed after new llib11 we are getting errors because of
Khurshid Alam has proposed merging
lp:~khurshid-alam/unity-control-center/drop-gnomebg into
lp:unity-control-center.
Commit message:
* Drop libgnome-desktop for background drawing. Use libunity-settings-daemon
instead. LP: #1863584
* Update version to 20.04 LTS
Requested reviews:
Sebastien
Review: Approve
Thanks!
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~khurshid-alam/unity-settings-daemon/drop-gnomebg/+merge/379825
Your team Unity Settings Daemon Development Team is subscribed to branch
lp:unity-settings-daemon.
--
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
Khurshid Alam has proposed merging
lp:~khurshid-alam/unity-settings-daemon/fix-build-focal into
lp:unity-settings-daemon.
Commit message:
Move gnome-update-wallpaper-cache into plugins/background so we can link
libraries properly.
Requested reviews:
Sebastien Bacher (seb128)
For more
Review: Approve
thanks!
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~khurshid-alam/unity-settings-daemon/fix-build-focal/+merge/379919
Your team Unity Settings Daemon Development Team is subscribed to branch
lp:unity-settings-daemon.
--
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
Build is failing
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/466568903/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-amd64.unity-settings-daemon_15.04.1+19.10.20190921-0ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz
:-(
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~khurshid-alam/unity-settings-daemon/drop-gnomebg/+merge/379825
Your team Unity Settings Daemon
The verification of the Stable Release Update for network-manager has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
Promotion done.
Till, as ghostscript doesn’t need any promotion if I‘m correct, I let you close
the bug in the changelog for your corresponding ghostscript upload.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop, which is subscribed to the bug report.
Override component to main
fonts-urw-base35 20170801.1-3 in focal: universe/misc -> main
fonts-urw-base35 20170801.1-3 in focal amd64: universe/fonts/optional/100% ->
main
fonts-urw-base35 20170801.1-3 in focal arm64: universe/fonts/optional/100% ->
main
fonts-urw-base35 20170801.1-3 in focal
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
** Also affects: network-manager via
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/issues/328
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues #2105
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2105
** Also
** Changed in: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/network-manager-applet/issues #59
** Changed in: network-manager
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Network-
manager, which is subscribed to NetworkManager.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858092
Title:
Network Manager not saving OpenVPN password
To
The proposal to merge ~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell:ubuntu/master into
~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell:ubuntu/master has been updated.
Status: Needs review => Rejected
For more details, see:
Hey there,
The Ubuntu network-manager vcs [1] has been updated following what was
done in Debian, the 'master' branch has been renamed 'ubuntu/master' and
the 'upstream' one 'upstream/latest'
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
[1] https://code.launchpad.net/~network-manager/network-manager/+git/ubuntu/
That's an old report and some comment states it's fixed with the patches
from https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597839 which are in
Ubuntu versions newer than 16.04.
Closing that report it's confusing as this point since it has comment
from users having different issues.
If anyone can
Closing then, it should be fixed in the current serie. The fix can still
be SRUed but the ppa package would need some change to be SRU compliant
THis change
* Ensure NM configures /etc/resolv.conf, not pppd (LP: #1778946)
references to a bug that doesn't impact the package nor describe the
Thank you for your bug report. What VPN type/plugin are you using?
Could you add your 'journalctl -b 0' log after getting the issue?
** No longer affects: network-manager
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
This bug was fixed in the package network-manager - 1.10.6-2ubuntu1.2
---
network-manager (1.10.6-2ubuntu1.2) bionic; urgency=medium
[ Till Kamppeter ]
* debian/tests/nm: Add gi.require_version() calls for NetworkManager
and NMClient to avoid stderr output which fails the
The verification of the Stable Release Update for network-manager has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
Public bug reported:
Hi,
This is a duplicate of bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/network-manager/+bug/1718931
It is marked as fixed, but the feature is still broken for me.
I configured my Wifi connection to automatically connect to a VPN, but it only
works if I manually
connect to the Wifi
I have just run the test case from this bug description on the bionic-proposed
version 1.10.6-2ubuntu1.2.
tcpdump does not show any leak of the VPN-specific queries. I have not observed
other issues in my tests.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added:
** Changed in: network-manager
Importance: Undecided => Unknown
** Changed in: network-manager
Status: New => Unknown
** Changed in: network-manager
Remote watch: None => github.com/nm-l2tp/NetworkManager-l2tp/issues #112
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
You should be able to install the debs from the newest Ubuntu serie for testing
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-l2tp/1.2.14-1/+build/17969079
The new versions are not only bugfixes so might not comply for SRUing
but we backport a fix
--
You received this bug notification
Thank you for your bug report, how do you configure those? Using
gnome-control-center? Do you have the same issue if you use
nm-connection-editor?
It seems more likely to be an issue in n-m or in the l2tp plugin, could you
report it upstream on
Hello dwmw2, or anyone else affected,
Accepted network-manager into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-
manager/1.10.6-2ubuntu1.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello TJ, or anyone else affected,
Accepted network-manager-applet into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/network-manager-applet/1.8.10-2ubuntu3 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
@Mathieu, the issue described here was fixed, it's probably best to open
a new bug (& upstream as well if possible) with a full journal log and
description of your issue
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Network-
manager, which is subscribed to NetworkManager.
Marco Trevisan (Treviño) has proposed merging
~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/nautilus:ubuntu/bionic into
~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/nautilus:ubuntu/bionic.
Commit message:
Sync VCS with packaging
Requested reviews:
Ubuntu Server Dev import team (usd-import-team)
Related bugs:
Bug #1767817 in
Ok, I've finally rebased this.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+git/gnome-shell/+merge/358477
Your team Ubuntu Desktop is subscribed to branch
~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell:ubuntu/bionic.
--
ubuntu-desktop mailing list
Marco Trevisan (Treviño) has proposed merging
~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/nautilus:ubuntu/bionic-xubuntu-cancel-search into
~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/nautilus:ubuntu/bionic with
~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/nautilus:ubuntu/bionic as a prerequisite.
Requested reviews:
Ubuntu Desktop (ubuntu-desktop)
The proposal to merge
~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/nautilus:ubuntu/bionic-xubuntu-cancel-search into
~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/nautilus:ubuntu/bionic has been updated.
Status: Needs review => Superseded
For more details, see:
Marco Trevisan (Treviño) has proposed merging
~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/mutter:ubuntu/master into
~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/mutter:ubuntu/master.
Requested reviews:
Ubuntu Desktop (ubuntu-desktop)
For more details, see:
The proposal to merge ~vanvugt/ubuntu/+source/mutter:fix-lp1847551 into
~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/mutter:ubuntu/master has been updated.
Status: Needs review => Rejected
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~vanvugt/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+git/mutter/+merge/374507
--
Your
The proposal to merge ~vanvugt/ubuntu/+source/mutter:fix-1809407 into
~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/mutter:ubuntu/disco has been updated.
Status: Needs review => Work in progress
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~vanvugt/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+git/mutter/+merge/372984
--
The version of network-manager in the proposed pocket of Bionic that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because one or more
bugs that were to be fixed by the upload have failed verification and
been in this state for more than 10 days.
--
You received this bug notification
Disco is not a priority, replaced by eoan. So closing.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~vanvugt/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+git/mutter/+merge/372984
Your team Ubuntu Desktop is requested to review the proposed merge of
~vanvugt/ubuntu/+source/mutter:fix-1809407 into
1 - 100 of 4497 matches
Mail list logo
