On 12/08/15 07:56, Robert Ancell wrote:
For us to use GNOME Software we probably want to update to the latest version
[1]. That's currently blocked because it needs PackageKit 1.0
[2]. And that's blocked until we get a Click update. If anyone knows more
migration issues please add
Le 30/07/2015 19:13, Amr Ibrahim a écrit :
I suggest putting a roadmap for this to see if it's possible or not.
Hey Amr,
Having a roadmap and people interested in working on the transition
seems like a good first step!
Before suggesting a replacement the alternative should be proved to be
good
For us to use GNOME Software we probably want to update to the latest
version [1]. That's currently blocked because it needs PackageKit 1.0 [2].
And that's blocked until we get a Click update. If anyone knows more
migration issues please add information to those bugs. I suspect we might
also need
I agree with S. Why can't we make improvements? Why do we waste our
time ranting about how horrible a piece of software is and how it
should be replaced, when we as developers can scratch that itch?
Submit bug reports, feature requests, and use it!
It is open-source for a reason. This is not
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 08:13:39PM +0300, Amr Ibrahim wrote:
I suggest dropping USC in future Ubuntu releases and adopt GNOME Software.
I personally think this is a bad idea. I have extensively tested and
tried to like Gnome Software on Fedora and openSUSE, but it was pretty
awful in my
On 01/08/15 02:50, Iain Lane wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 08:13:39PM +0300, Amr Ibrahim wrote:
Dear developers,
USC is getting old. It is in Python 2, and probably will never be ported to
Python 3.
I suggest dropping USC in future Ubuntu releases and adopt GNOME Software.
GNOME
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 08:13:39PM +0300, Amr Ibrahim wrote:
Dear developers,
USC is getting old. It is in Python 2, and probably will never be ported to
Python 3.
I suggest dropping USC in future Ubuntu releases and adopt GNOME Software.
GNOME Software is build on newer GNOME
On 30/07/15 19:31, Jacky Alcine wrote:
That'd require GNOME to be willing to have an extensibility factor to allow
for USC features to be incorporated into it.
It's fine. Ubuntu developers could sync a local tree of the software in
Launchpad and patch those features only locally if they are
On Thursday, July 30, 2015 08:13:39 PM Amr Ibrahim wrote:
Dear developers,
USC is getting old. It is in Python 2, and probably will never be ported to
Python 3.
I suggest dropping USC in future Ubuntu releases and adopt GNOME Software.
GNOME Software is build on newer GNOME technologies.
