On 01/24/2011 12:58 AM, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 03:09 -0500, Jacky Alcine wrote:
>> On 01/21/2011 01:14 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 07:36:55AM -0800, Rick Spencer wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 16:16 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 03:09 -0500, Jacky Alcine wrote:
> On 01/21/2011 01:14 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 07:36:55AM -0800, Rick Spencer wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 16:16 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> >>> Vishnoo [2011-01-21 20:41 +0530]:
> Is there a bug filed f
On 01/22/2011 06:08 AM, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> Le samedi 22 janvier 2011 à 03:09 -0500, Jacky Alcine a écrit :
>> Is there a way of flashing the loaded applications in memory and all of
>> those handles to disk and just loading it back?
> There is CryoPID, but it doesn't work (yet?) with X ap
Le samedi 22 janvier 2011 à 03:09 -0500, Jacky Alcine a écrit :
> Is there a way of flashing the loaded applications in memory and all of
> those handles to disk and just loading it back?
There is CryoPID, but it doesn't work (yet?) with X applications, and
doesn't seem to have gotten much support.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 16:16, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Vishnoo [2011-01-21 20:41 +0530]:
> > Is there a bug filed for this, which we could follow?
>
> I don't think we should bother. Session saving can't ever be perfect.
> You won't ever get back things like your unsaved current documents,
> undo bu
On 01/21/2011 01:14 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 07:36:55AM -0800, Rick Spencer wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 16:16 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
>>> Vishnoo [2011-01-21 20:41 +0530]:
Is there a bug filed for this, which we could follow?
>>> I don't think we should bothe
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 07:36:55AM -0800, Rick Spencer wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 16:16 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Vishnoo [2011-01-21 20:41 +0530]:
> > > Is there a bug filed for this, which we could follow?
> >
> > I don't think we should bother. Session saving can't ever be perfect.
> >
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 16:16 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Vishnoo [2011-01-21 20:41 +0530]:
> > Is there a bug filed for this, which we could follow?
>
> I don't think we should bother. Session saving can't ever be perfect.
> You won't ever get back things like your unsaved current documents,
> undo
Vishnoo [2011-01-21 20:41 +0530]:
> Is there a bug filed for this, which we could follow?
I don't think we should bother. Session saving can't ever be perfect.
You won't ever get back things like your unsaved current documents,
undo buffers, network connections (chat), etc, and those are much more
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 18:00 +0100, Didier Roche wrote:
> Hey fellow desktop lovers,
>
> I still personally think that this feature can be really good addition
> to Ubuntu default experience if we can take time to make it very
> polished as well as working for most of - if not all - major
> applica
Hey fellow desktop lovers,
Here is a notice on what we decided during the Rally: we drop session
saving from natty in Ubuntu. The disablement is already effective in
natty.
== What was the option about? ==
The option was about launching on session start, the applications which
were running when
11 matches
Mail list logo
