Re: Software installation on modern Ubuntu

2017-08-31 Thread Marcos Alano
Kudos for you Matthew. Fonts are a package category which need a GUI to show some preview images. On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:01 AM, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: > Colin Law wrote on 26/08/17 18:21: >>… >> OK, I see where you are coming from. It never occurred to me that >> anyone wanting to install

Re: Software installation on modern Ubuntu

2017-08-31 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
Colin Law wrote on 26/08/17 18:21: >… > OK, I see where you are coming from. It never occurred to me that > anyone wanting to install libgtk2.0-dev, or similar, would want to use > a GUI. I assumed everyone used apt for that. Obviously I am wrong. >… Fonts are a clear example of packages that are

Re: Software installation on modern Ubuntu

2017-08-26 Thread Nrbrtx
Thank you, Ralf! > To see into what packages software from upstream is >split https://tracker.debian.org/ is helpful. Helpful >is https://packages.ubuntu.com/ in combination with Google. I'm very familiar with this sites and console utilities - apt-get, apt-cache, aptitude, dpkg, apt-file (searche

Re: Software installation on modern Ubuntu

2017-08-26 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Nrbrtx wrote: > I discovered another great tool - Muon Package Manager. It really rocks. > I'll try to use it as Synaptic replacement. Please also try gnome-packagekit. (It installs an app named Packages). One more issue with Synaptic is that it does not work on

Re: Software installation on modern Ubuntu

2017-08-26 Thread Nrbrtx
>OK, I see where you are coming from. It never occurred to me that >anyone wanting to install libgtk2.0-dev, or similar, would want to use >a GUI. I assumed everyone used apt for that. Obviously I am wrong. lol :) In other words gnome-software is not a good alternative for software-center. It's a

Re: Software installation on modern Ubuntu

2017-08-26 Thread Nrbrtx
IMHO gnome-software is too simplified and stupid as all modern GNOME. No options (except of shortcut to software-properties-gtk), no advanced search. I will not use it. 63% of 88 reviews are negative. > It has exactly the same set of s/w available as Synaptic does. False. Let's assume that we need

Re: Software installation on modern Ubuntu

2017-08-26 Thread Nrbrtx
Thank you for reply, Matthew! I discovered another great tool - Muon Package Manager. It really rocks. I'll try to use it as Synaptic replacement. But please take care about aforementioned bugs. I list them again: bug 1612948: axi-cache conversion to python3 broke the script (12 users affected) <

Re: Software installation on modern Ubuntu

2017-08-24 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
Nrbrtx wrote on 24/08/17 01:33: >… > As far I can understand here were two methods of software > installation: > 1. apt (apt-get), dpkg, aptitude - for advanced users > 2. synaptic and Ubuntu software-center - for newbies. Synaptic is fine for what it is, but it is not even close to being “for new

Software installation on modern Ubuntu

2017-08-23 Thread Nrbrtx
Dear Ubuntu developers! I'm using Debian since 3.1 and using Ubuntu since 6.06. So let me write about installing programs. As far I can understand here were two methods of software installation: 1. apt (apt-get), dpkg, aptitude - for advanced users 2. synaptic and Ubuntu software-center - for new