On 3 October 2014 14:42, Colin Watson cjwat...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Hi,
We've always built Architecture: all packages as part of our i386
builds. This is beginning to look a bit outdated. A few packages have
had difficulty building their architecture-independent components on
amd64 (usually
Would now also be a good time to look through the archive and assess the
various arch:all packages that do not explicitly declare themselves as
Multi-Arch:foreign (and thus not installable as dependencies of foreign
architecture packages?) Is there a reason for any such arch:all package to
not
On Oct 05, 2014, at 04:28 PM, Scott Ritchie wrote:
Would now also be a good time to look through the archive and assess the
various arch:all packages that do not explicitly declare themselves as
Multi-Arch:foreign (and thus not installable as dependencies of foreign
architecture packages?) Is
