I wish Edubuntu to be continued.
I am happy to join with Ali/amjjawad to help on release process.
Though I am new to ubuntu contributions, as a GNU/Linux admin for ten
years, can learn things quickly and jump on actions soon.
Please guide me on where to start on edubuntu release works.
Thanks.
Hello all,
If you have ever done a library or other transition that required
landing a set of packages in lockstep, you probably know
http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output.txt
However, this page only shows the uninstallability that a proposed
package
Le 19/05/2016 14:54, Martin Pitt a écrit :
> I'd say that cases like this at least require prodding some SRU team
> member with some good reason -- I wouldn't expect these uploads to get
> accepted as part of the regular workflow.
Thanks for the feedback Martin!
I think what you wrote makes
Sebastien Bacher [2016-05-19 10:24 +0200]:
> Libreoffice (to stay on that example) tends to exercice new compiler
> versions/toolchain in challenging ways and it's not uncommon that
> getting it to build on a new serie takes some time. Also it's often the
> case that we aim at landing a new
Le 19/05/2016 09:55, Martin Pitt a écrit :
> It appears to me that the same happened for wily: The wily SRU was
> uploaded on Oct 28, but the xenial package only on Nov 11. So back
> then the SRU wasn't accepted because of "devel first", and then it
> probably feel into the mental category of
Sebastien Bacher [2016-05-18 18:08 +0200]:
> We had a libreoffice bugfix SRU in the week after the 15.10 release to
> address some of the user feedback we received from the iso version,
> that's still waiting in the queue unreviewed as far as we can tell (the
> bugs references didn't get updates,
