I would relly like the dscussion to go on widely as it is now.
Otherwise I would probably not follow this interesting discussion.
best regards
keld
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:02:09PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> russell, good to hear from you.
>
> can i recommend, that although t
russell, good to hear from you.
can i recommend, that although this is a really wide set of
cross-posting on a discussion that underpins pretty much everything
(except gnu/hurd and minix) because it's linux kernel, that, just as
steve kindly advised, we keep this to e.g.
cross-dis...@lists.linaro.
Russell:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:11:41AM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote:
>> As such refactoring consolidated larger and larger chunks of kernel
>> code, new designs would gravitate towards those consolidated
>> implementations beca
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:11:41AM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> As such refactoring consolidated larger and larger chunks of kernel
> code, new designs would gravitate towards those consolidated
> implementations because they would be the dominant references.
Don't bet on it. That's not how it wo
David:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:55 PM, wrote:
> ARM is currently in worse shape than the PC market ever was in this aspect,
> but in this case it's less a matter of getting the hardware guys to change
> what they do than it is to get better documentation of what the hardware is
> really doing a
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Bill Gatliff wrote:
I have observed all the hand-wringing regarding the state of ARM
Linux, and it's obvious to everyone that there is still work to be
done. ARM isn't like PCs, and that's obviously inconvenient for Linus
but it's an essential part of ARM's success.
I thi
Luke:
Step back from the keyboard just a bit. :)
It's true that the glass isn't completely full--- but it's pretty
darned full! And we wouldn't be discussing the various GPL and other
violations that you cite were it not for the overwhelming successes of
Free Software, ARM, Linux, and Android.
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:00:43 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
[ok i'm going to do another cross-post in a bit which will give some
background and also perhaps some other topics for discussion, but i
wanted to cover this first. apologies for people for whom this is
just noise]
On Tue,
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:15:34PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>Following on from the founding of the cross-distro ARM mailing list,
>I'd like to propose an ARM summit at this year's Linux Plumbers
>conference [1]. I'm hoping for a slot on Thursday evening, but this
>remains to be con
[ok i'm going to do another cross-post in a bit which will give some
background and also perhaps some other topics for discussion, but i
wanted to cover this first. apologies for people for whom this is
just noise]
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 7:01 PM, wrote:
>> the xilinx zynq-7000 or similar (du
On 08/23/2011 07:01 PM, omall...@msu.edu wrote:
Quoting Gordan Bobic :
Unfortunately there is no way I could make it, but on the subject of 3D
support on ARM, Luke recently mentioned something that initially seemed
outlandish but upon closer examination doesn't seem like a bad idea. As
we all kn
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:11:34 +0100, Steve McIntyre
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:15:34PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hi folks,
Following on from the founding of the cross-distro ARM mailing list,
I'd like to propose an ARM summit at this year's Linux Plumbers
conference [1]. I'm hoping fo
Quoting Gordan Bobic :
Unfortunately there is no way I could make it, but on the subject of 3D
support on ARM, Luke recently mentioned something that initially seemed
outlandish but upon closer examination doesn't seem like a bad idea. As
we all know, the state of openness of specifications o
13 matches
Mail list logo
