The wiki page in the paragraph regarding SRU testing might indeed not
be entirely realistic, but it is the *recommended* way of going
forward. With my SRU hat on, I personally would never reject someone's
SRU verification just because the person performing it was the
uploader. Sure, bonus points
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:26:15PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:05:15PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > - I've uploaded quite a few SRUs by now, and maybe a handful have been
> > (partially)
> > verified by someone else. Partially because these people only test
Nope, that's not the standard, expected procedure. It is always better to
have someone else verify a fix, it's sometimes not feasible though.
"While not ideal it is also possible for the uploader of the fix to perform
the verification of the package in *-proposed"
-
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 09:34:07AM -0700, Bryan Quigley wrote:
> Nope, that's not the standard, expected procedure. It is always better to
> have someone else verify a fix, it's sometimes not feasible though.
>
> "While not ideal it is also possible for the uploader of the fix to perform
> the
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:07:18PM +0200, Andreas Ronnquist wrote:
> Forwarding to Ubuntu-devel, and posting as a reminder to the SciTE
> mailinglist.
>
> It would still be nice to have this in 18.04, but I cannot review my
> own work.
Why not? Verifying your own SRU is the standard, expected
Forwarding to Ubuntu-devel, and posting as a reminder to the SciTE
mailinglist.
It would still be nice to have this in 18.04, but I cannot review my
own work.
Thanks in advance.
---
Start av vidarebefordrat meddelande:
Datum:Wed, 8 May 2019 00:57:18 +0200
