Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2024-05-31 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:35 PM Benjamin Drung wrote: > rust-axum-core > == > > update_excuse claims that rust-axum-core has no binaries on any arch, > but https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-axum-core/0.3.4-1 shows > that librust-axum-core-dev was build on all archs. I asked

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2024-05-30 Thread Brian Murray
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 07:04:11PM +, Graham Inggs wrote: > I was on +1 maintenance from 2024-05-23 until 2024-25-29. Below are > the things I worked on. > > > The autopkgtest queues were completely empty following the Mardid > sprint. I noticed the update_excuses report [1] still showed

Re: +1 maintenance report

2024-02-28 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Tuesday, February 27 2024, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 06:31:39PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> * celery >> - Spent a long time investigating the Python 3.12 segfault that >> happens when running dh_auto_test. I was able to obtain a usable >> stacktrace.

Re: +1 maintenance report

2024-02-27 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 06:31:39PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > * celery > - Spent a long time investigating the Python 3.12 segfault that > happens when running dh_auto_test. I was able to obtain a usable > stacktrace. > - I'll file an upstream bug. I don't know if you ever

Re: +1 maintenance report

2024-02-12 Thread Bryce Harrington
Heya Benjamin, Just wanted to followup in sharing the spreadsheet as it is so far. Thanks again for all the suggestions! https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wLOIM-mkN02O-n84YXAOMC6MjEetCyID5JMonEAZSIU Definitely let me know if you stumble across other useful things, or even just have

Re: +1 maintenance report

2024-02-08 Thread Matthias Klose
On 07.02.24 09:17, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 6:17 AM Pushkar Kulkarni wrote: === freedombox/bootstrapform === The freedombox package depends on bootstrapform. Autopkgtests of the former fail because the latter imports distutils. I did a Debian MR [15] to replace

Re: +1 maintenance report

2024-02-07 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi, On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 10:42 AM Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 9:47 PM Pushkar Kulkarni > wrote: > > > > === freedombox/bootstrapform === > > The freedombox package depends on bootstrapform. Autopkgtests of the > > former fail because the latter imports

Re: +1 maintenance report

2024-02-07 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Pushkar, On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 6:17 AM Pushkar Kulkarni wrote: > I was on my first +1 maintenance shift last week. I began the week > with some reading of +1 report of the past shifts, to get a basic idea > of what to do and how to do it. Nice, thanks for your good work and excellent

Re: +1 maintenance report

2024-02-07 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi, On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 9:47 PM Pushkar Kulkarni wrote: > > === freedombox/bootstrapform === > The freedombox package depends on bootstrapform. Autopkgtests of the > former fail because the latter imports distutils. I did a Debian MR > [15] to replace distutils.StrictVersion with

Re: +1 maintenance report

2024-01-28 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Sergio, On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 06:31:39PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > * r-bioc-savr > - There's an RM bug against the package on Debian. I didn't touch the > FTBFS. However, Debian package removal requests take an indeterminate amount of time to be acted on by the ftp team,

Re: +1 maintenance report

2024-01-03 Thread Benjamin Drung
Hi Bryce, On Fri, 2023-12-15 at 15:54 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote: > Heya Benjamin, > > Quick question for you. I'm collecting a list of tools people are > finding useful or interesting for doing +1 maintenance. Can you mention > any such scripts you used on your rotation this week? I'm in

Re: +1 maintenance report

2023-12-15 Thread Bryce Harrington
Heya Benjamin, Quick question for you. I'm collecting a list of tools people are finding useful or interesting for doing +1 maintenance. Can you mention any such scripts you used on your rotation this week? I'm in particular looking for weird/random/unusual stuff, personal or one-off codes,

Re: +1 maintenance report

2023-10-06 Thread Vladimir Petko
I was on +1 maintenance this week and worked on the following: - stdgpu: requested to move libthrust-dev to the universe to resolve dependency-wait. Package migrated. LP: 2037908 - atop: investigated the autopkgtest failure on armhf. The root cause was the atopacctd service not starting in the

Re: +1 maintenance report

2023-09-12 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Friday, September 01 2023, Benjamin Drung wrote: > * **gsl**: Retried failing ruby-gsl/2.1.0.3+dfsg1-5build2 on ppc64el. > It is still failing and needs to be investigated. I did a little investigative work and found that the problem can be workarounded by compiling with -O2 instead of -O3.

Re: +1 maintenance report (14/Aug - 18/Aug)

2023-08-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 02:28:50PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > The armhf lxd containers do not have hard partitioning of memory > > allocations, so *generally* tests on armhf will have more memory available > > than on other architectures. But that memory is also shared across tests, > >

Re: +1 maintenance report (14/Aug - 18/Aug)

2023-08-21 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 09:47:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:16:31AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > + golang-github-protonmail-go-crypto > > The error message says "out of memory". I can reproduce this on a VM with > > 500M memory. > > It's because the

Re: +1 maintenance report (14/Aug - 18/Aug)

2023-08-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:16:31AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > + golang-github-protonmail-go-crypto > The error message says "out of memory". I can reproduce this on a VM with > 500M memory. > It's because the testdata in TestSymmetricDecryptionArgon2 uses a large > memory exponent

Re: +1 maintenance report

2023-07-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 05:43:36PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > # rust-block-padding > I didn't really make sense of this. How is a build of > rust-block-buffer-0.9 resulting in a binary > librust-block-buffer-0.9+block-padding-dev that has a versioned binary > dependency on

Re: +1 maintenance report

2023-07-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 03:18:04PM -0400, Nick Rosbrook wrote: > # lua-resty-core (LP 2025072) [needs AA] > This package is uninstallable due to a dependency on > libnginx-mod-http-lua, which is not in the Ubuntu archive due to an > intentional removal (LP: #1986853). > lua-resty-core has no

Re: +1 maintenance report

2023-06-09 Thread Brian Murray
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 06:20:55PM +0100, Danilo Egea Gondolfo wrote: > I had a shorter week with some Netplan distractions but here we go: > > 1. delve > > FTBFS due to the installed bpftool not matching the running kernel version. > I tried to workaround this by calling bpftool directly from >

Re: +1 maintenance report

2023-06-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 10:43:41PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > 3. librnd + camv-rnd + pcb-rnd > camv-rnd and pcb-rnd are in dep-wait status, it needs librnd > 4. > It's a small library transition. So I just ask @ginggs to kick off the > transition. > Also ask for revoking the

Re: +1 maintenance report

2023-05-26 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 09:40:02AM -0700, Simon Chopin wrote: > See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-gio/+bug/2020880 > See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-graphene-sys/+bug/2020902 Thanks for tagging these update-excuse! -- Steve Langasek Give me

Re: +1 maintenance report

2023-05-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 05:53:54PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: > * Follow-up on Lukas Märdian +1 shift: matplotlib 3.6.3-1 was not > synced. My sync was rejected: "same version already has published > binaries in the destination archive". I did a fake sync by uploading > 3.6.3-1fakesync1

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2023-04-12 Thread Zixing Liu
> Overall, it seems that you looked at a large number of packages in > -proposed, but that for most of them you stopped at analysis (which is > useful) without preparing and submitting fixes for the issues identified. > In the future, please focus more on the latter, as that's what's actually >

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2023-04-11 Thread Steve Langasek
Congratulations on your first +1 maintenance rotation! On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:45:49AM -0600, Zixing Liu wrote: > rust-criterion (0.3.6-3 to 0.4.0-2) > Due to the `rustc` version discrepancy between Ubuntu and Debian, > `rust-criterion` failed to compile in Ubuntu. > I have backported an

Re: +1 maintenance report

2023-04-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 05:59:46PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > This week is shorter than usual because of the holiday tomorrow, so I am > sending my report today: > ruby-mocha > == > > It is blocked by ruby-bourne for more than 3 months. ruby-bourne does not > support ruby 3.1 and it

Re: +1 maintenance report

2023-02-21 Thread Adrien Nader
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 03:51:50PM +0100, Adrien Nader wrote: > > Due to the size of the queues, I decided to start with the oldest > > issues. > > Out of interest, how did you identify these "oldest issues"? I happened to > spend some time on

Re: +1 maintenance report

2023-02-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 03:51:50PM +0100, Adrien Nader wrote: > Due to the size of the queues, I decided to start with the oldest > issues. Out of interest, how did you identify these "oldest issues"? I happened to spend some time on proposed-migration on Thursday, and all of the packages I

Re: +1 maintenance report

2023-02-17 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Thursday, February 16 2023, I wrote: > On Monday, February 13 2023, Steve Langasek wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 01:58:56PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >>> * gatb-core >>> - Debian dropped s390x from the list of supported architectures. >>> - Pinged ubuntu-archive and asked

Re: +1 maintenance report

2023-02-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 02:35:51PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > >> * bcbio & mosdepth & nim-{unicodeplus,regex} > >> - In -proposed for 95 days. > >> - bcbio is FTBFSing because it B-D on mosdepth. > >> - mosdepth is FTBFSing because it B-D on nim-regex. > >> - nim-regex and its

Re: +1 maintenance report

2023-02-16 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Monday, February 13 2023, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 01:58:56PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> * gatb-core >> - Debian dropped s390x from the list of supported architectures. >> - Pinged ubuntu-archive and asked them to reflect this decision so >> that

Re: +1 maintenance report

2023-02-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 01:58:56PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > * gatb-core > - Debian dropped s390x from the list of supported architectures. > - Pinged ubuntu-archive and asked them to reflect this decision so > that britney lets the package migrate. Missed in backlog while I

Re: +1 maintenance report

2023-02-12 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Nick, On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 4:18 AM Nick Rosbrook wrote: > ### openlibm FTBFS on armhf > > LP: #2006501 > > Debian already has a fix committed, but has not released for a few > months now. I verified the fix works for us, and proposed uploading > the fix with a `maysync` version to allow

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-12-08 Thread Robie Basak
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 05:06:30PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > However, sometimes you might find --apt-pocket=proposed=... *not* used, > > even when triggers appear to exist. I didn't get to the bottom of this. > > Maybe it's something to do with magic fallback behaviour I've heard > >

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-12-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 05:06:30PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Second, even though the above should already pick up more packages from > -proposed that we need, I've also added --all-proposed, saying to grab all > packages from -proposed. Two reasons for this: FYI, although this is correct in

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-12-05 Thread Steve Langasek
Sorry to hear that you had a frustrating time with +1 maintenance last week. Large transitions can definitely be frustrating because many times, it's so unclear how to make progress on them. Some notes: - The request.cgi API endpoint does deduplication of test requests on the backend. So

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-12-05 Thread Robie Basak
Hi Seb, On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 09:01:32PM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Hey Robie, your email was interesting to read, I've one question bellow > > Le 05/12/2022 à 18:04, Robie Basak a écrit : > > I thought I recalled a > >colleague mentioning something about this in ubuntu-helpers > >

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-12-05 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Hey Robie, your email was interesting to read, I've one question bellow Le 05/12/2022 à 18:04, Robie Basak a écrit : I thought I recalled a colleague mentioning something about this in ubuntu-helpers Could you share a reference to ubuntu-helpers? I don't know about that project and neither

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-10-21 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Hi, Em sex., 21 de out. de 2022 19:47, Sergio Durigan Junior < sergio.duri...@canonical.com> escreveu: > * golang-github-containerd-stargz-snapshotter > - FTBFSing on Ubuntu, but not on Debian, which is strange. > - I've started investigating it but couldn't progress much further >

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-10-21 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Friday, October 21 2022, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Sergio, Hello, > On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 06:47:09PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> * cryfs >> - FTBFS on ppc64el due to RLIMIT_MEMLOCK being too low. >> - After spending some time playing with setrlimit et al, it's clear to >>

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-10-21 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Sergio, On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 06:47:09PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > * cryfs > - FTBFS on ppc64el due to RLIMIT_MEMLOCK being too low. > - After spending some time playing with setrlimit et al, it's clear to > me that the problem cannot be easily fixed in the source code.

don't ignore SIGBUS failures [Was, Re: +1 Maintenance Report]

2022-10-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Bryce, On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 06:37:06PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > ### scikit-learn ### > This package hits a 'bus error' on armhf. This issue seems not to have > a bug report in Debian, however bus errors are mentioned on both Deb: > #1008369 and #1003165. Both bugs have extensive

Re: +1 Maintenance report

2022-09-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 12:17:34PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > *vectorscan* > > vectorscan does not build on amd64 > This seems to be due to warnings for the implementation of vectors in > libboost. > We have not updated libboost since 2 years. We should have a look at it > after the

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2022-09-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 08:51:51AM -0700, eeickme...@ubuntu.com wrote: > On Fri, 2022-09-16 at 18:12 -0600, Dan Bungert wrote: > > # qtav / matrix-mirage (LP: #1989613) # > > "QtAV is no longer maintained" per > > https://github.com/wang-bin/QtAV/blob/master/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE#L19 >

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2022-09-18 Thread eeickmeyer
On Fri, 2022-09-16 at 18:12 -0600, Dan Bungert wrote: > # qtav / matrix-mirage (LP: #1989613) # > > "QtAV is no longer maintained" per > https://github.com/wang-bin/QtAV/blob/master/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE#L19 > > It does have a reverse dependency from matrix-mirage, which itself >

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-09-12 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 8:20 PM Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > # rails > > It is stuck in -proposed because the new version contains a fix for > CVE-2022-32224 which introduced a behavior change in the way > hashes are serialized. I filed LP: #1988782 and tagged it as > update-excuse. Utkarsh as

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-08-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 07:30:47PM +0200, Olivier Gayot wrote: > opencolorio: > --- > The package had also been updated recently with a new upstream version ahead > of Debian. Unfortunately, the SONAME was bumped but the binary library > package was not renamed. > To fix it, I decided to

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-08-17 Thread Nick Rosbrook
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 7:13 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:29:34AM -0400, Nick Rosbrook wrote: > > > ## libxsmm FTBFS (https://pad.lv/1984111) > > > This FTBFS with an undefined reference to pthread_yield. Upstream > > already has fixes for this, so I cherry-picked

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-08-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:29:34AM -0400, Nick Rosbrook wrote: > ## libxsmm FTBFS (https://pad.lv/1984111) > This FTBFS with an undefined reference to pthread_yield. Upstream > already has fixes for this, so I cherry-picked those. > I am still looking for a sponsor for this patch. Thanks,

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-08-03 Thread Brian Murray
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 09:21:04PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > > On Friday, July 22 2022, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Hi Sergio, > > Hello, > > Sorry for the delay. I was travelling and then on medical leave. > > > I notice in this report that most of the items you worked on

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-08-03 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Friday, July 22 2022, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Sergio, Hello, Sorry for the delay. I was travelling and then on medical leave. > I notice in this report that most of the items you worked on requiring > source changes have Debian bugs or MPs as references, but there is no > mention of

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-07-31 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 at 11:51, Michael Hudson-Doyle < michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 at 11:06, Steve Langasek > wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 05:48:25PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: >> > On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 4:02 PM Steve Langasek >> > wrote: >> > > On Fri,

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-07-31 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 at 11:06, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 05:48:25PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 4:02 PM Steve Langasek > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 03:36:32PM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > > > There is some stuff on NBS due to

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-07-31 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 7:06 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > It is my understanding that ldc is not broken but that gir-to-d is not > compatible with the current version. There are 6 source packages in the > archive that have successfully rebuilt against the new version of > libphobos2-ldc-shared,

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-07-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 05:48:25PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 4:02 PM Steve Langasek > wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 03:36:32PM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > > There is some stuff on NBS due to a ldc transition: r-to-d, > > > appstream-generator, tilix,

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-07-31 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 4:02 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 03:36:32PM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > There is some stuff on NBS due to a ldc transition: r-to-d, > > appstream-generator, tilix, etc. AFAICT all of these packages have been > > removed from Debian testing

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-07-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 07:02:02PM -0600, Dan Bungert wrote: > # unpaper (LP: #1982594) # > A newer version of unpaper is in the deferred queue currently and does build > for Kinetic and Sid. I suggest we sync that, when available. Will be synced automatically since the package in

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-07-31 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Michael, On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 03:36:32PM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > autofdo (last package depending on libgoogle-glog0v5) ftbfs, probably > because our llvm is too new. Upstream /may/ have this fixed in git, > unfortunately in an omnibus commit with the message "Update to the

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-07-29 Thread Rik Mills
On 29/07/2022 05:08, eeickme...@ubuntu.com wrote: > Moreover, I cannot find any sign of the source code for 8.x, but > they've somehow released some pre-alpha appimages (???!). master branch on invent.kde.org is 8.0.0 development https://www.digikam.org/download/git/ The project version in the

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-07-28 Thread eeickmeyer
Hi Michael! On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 15:36 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Thanks to sickness and leave and other interruptions I didn't get a > whole lot done in my shift, and I didn't do a very good job of > recording the things I did do I'm afraid. My condolances, I hope you feel better

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-07-22 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Sergio, I notice in this report that most of the items you worked on requiring source changes have Debian bugs or MPs as references, but there is no mention of what is done to get them resolved in Ubuntu. We want to push fixes upstream to Debian and minimize unnecessary delta, but the purpose

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-07-19 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Hi, On 18/07/2022 12:02, Nick Rosbrook wrote: ### ruby-certificate-authority FTBFS (https://pad.lv/1981458) There was a print format change for the x509 v3 authority key identifer field in openssl 3.0, and this test suite appears to depend on that format. Changing the expected test string to

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-07-13 Thread Brian Murray
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 05:05:15PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > I've been on +1 maintenance shift from Monday to Wednesday. I'm also > working on my DebConf presentation & debuginfod in parallel. > > Retriggers that worked > == > > sqlite> SELECT DISTINCT

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-07-13 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
On Wednesday, July 13 2022, I wrote: > * sbcl > - As Athos mentioned > (https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2022-July/042200.html), > we're starting to work on bootstrapping sbcl on ppc64el. > - Unfortunately we've hit some bumps... The build is mysteriously >

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2022-07-05 Thread Brian Murray
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 05:39:38PM -0700, Brian Murray wrote: > On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:25:39PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > As William Wilson and Graham Inggs mentioned, there seems to be a higher > > than usual amount of FTBFS compared with autopkgtest failures. There > > doesn't seem

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2022-07-01 Thread Brian Murray
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:25:39PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > As William Wilson and Graham Inggs mentioned, there seems to be a higher > than usual amount of FTBFS compared with autopkgtest failures. There > doesn't seem to be a common pattern going on, just a lot of package > ecosystems in

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2022-07-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:25:39PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > As William Wilson and Graham Inggs mentioned, there seems to be a higher > than usual amount of FTBFS compared with autopkgtest failures. There > doesn't seem to be a common pattern going on, just a lot of package > ecosystems in

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2022-07-01 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 11:54:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 01:40:53PM -0500, William Wilson wrote: > > Steve, > > > Thank you for your work on this. I apologize for the lack of detail in my > > earlier email. In order to get g-g-j-pgtype to build in my PPA with > >

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2022-07-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 01:40:53PM -0500, William Wilson wrote: > Steve, > Thank you for your work on this. I apologize for the lack of detail in my > earlier email. In order to get g-g-j-pgtype to build in my PPA with > g-g-j-pgx version 3.x, I had to change a line in d/control. I changed the >

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2022-07-01 Thread William Wilson
Steve, Thank you for your work on this. I apologize for the lack of detail in my earlier email. In order to get g-g-j-pgtype to build in my PPA with g-g-j-pgx version 3.x, I had to change a line in d/control. I changed the dependency "golang-github-jackc-pgx-v4-dev" to

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2022-07-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 11:28:25AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > So, I think the bootstrap solution might be: > > 1. Verify that g-g-j-pgtype (1.10.0-3) actually does build > > successfully against g-g-j-pgx-dev (3.6.2-2). (This is probably > > best to verify in a PPA.) If so,

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2022-07-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 10:08:26AM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > Are there any methods for dealing with this type of circular dependency? > > In Debian I can see they did a binary-only upload to fix this, but as > > far as I know there is no such thing in Ubuntu. > Right, that's not

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2022-07-01 Thread William Wilson
Bryce, Thanks for replying here and in IRC. it does appear g-g-j-pgtype does successfully build with g-g-j-pgx 3.6.2-2. I'm about to EOW but will contact an AA next week about the next steps. Thanks again! William On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 12:08 PM Bryce Harrington <

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2022-07-01 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 11:34:13AM -0500, William Wilson wrote: > Greetings ubuntu-devel, > > This week I was on +1 maintenance and I noticed an odd circular dependency > between two packages. > >- Package golang-github-jackc-pgtype is in NEW and is dependency wait on >

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-06-13 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Hi, On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 7:29 AM Simon Chopin wrote: > ruby-gitlab-fog-azure-rm: > The test suite fails due to Ruby 3.0 incompatibilities. > I patched out the Proc.new.call invocations into explicit block.call ones, > submitted both to upstream and Debian. The upstream MR has been merged >

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-05-30 Thread Brian Murray
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 09:38:33AM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Hi, > > Last week was my +1 maintenance shift, this time I decided to try to unblock > packages stuck in -proposed for too long (bottom of the excuses page). Below > you can find a summary of what I did: > > # debos > > Revisit

Re: +1 Maintenance report 23-27 May 2022

2022-05-30 Thread Alexandre Ghiti
And I forgot to mention: astroquery I added a patch to fix the permission denied on accessing files here : https://launchpad.net/~alexghiti/+archive/ubuntu/riscv/+sourcepub/13638113/+listing-archive-extra But then autopkgtest fails on armhf

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-05-16 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Robie On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 23:04, Robie Basak wrote: > octave is in dep-wait on riscv64 for libpetsc-real3.16-dev > Produced by src:petsc which FTBFS on riscv64 > FTBFS is because of missing symbol SCOTCH_ParMETIS_V3_NodeND > On amd64 this is shipped in libptscotchparmetisv3-7.0.1.so in >

Right place to distribute general-purpose dev tools [Re: +1 maintenance report]

2022-04-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 11:36:20AM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 10:35:36PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > I unfortunately do not have a good place to publish it at the moment so that > > it's more visible to developers. Suggestions welcome. > On the server team, as an

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-04-05 Thread Robie Basak
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 10:35:36PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > I unfortunately do not have a good place to publish it at the moment so that > it's more visible to developers. Suggestions welcome. On the server team, as an experiment we started a git repository to share this kind of "I wrote a

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-04-04 Thread Steve Langasek
Thanks for your work on +1 maintenance! One bit I want to call attention to: On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 10:17:44PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > ## NBS ## > I uploaded no-change rebuilds of the 11 NBS packages to a PPA; 4 of > these build successfully, so I uploaded the no-change rebuilds to

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-02-18 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 05:14:46PM +, Robie Basak wrote: > I was on +1 maintenance this week. > > It's been a long time (years) since I last did this. I'm not sure I had > a good feel for what would be useful to work on, so rather than spending > time changing my mind constantly I just

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-02-14 Thread Brian Murray
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 03:16:56PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > Hi, > > I was on +1 maintenance last week and I focused on python3-defaults > regressions: > > libapache2-mod-python > --- > > This package must be adapted to support python 3.10, patches can be >

Re: +1 maintenance report

2022-01-31 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hiya, On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 9:51 PM Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > ## node-pbkdf2 (LP: #191828) > > The tests have been failing on s390x because of it > being big-endian but I've been in touch with people > on the Debian side (we're all part of the JS team) > and we're trying to fix this. The upstream

Re: +1 maintenance report

2021-12-17 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:18 PM Simon Chopin wrote: > I picked up a short +1 shift for the last two days of the week. I > focused on -proposed migrations. > > # ruby-gnome > > Fix the autopkgtests for ruby-gnome, which were missing a dependency on > ruby-webrick after the ruby 3.0 transition,

Re: +1 maintenance report

2021-11-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 05:59:49PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > segyio: > Tries to use MINSIGSTKSZ as part of a constant expression, but in glibc 2.34 > this now expands to a call to sysconf(). Needs a bit more C++ surgery than > I was prepared to do at the end of my shift. Filed LP: #1951658.

Re: +1 maintenance report

2021-11-19 Thread Athos Ribeiro
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 05:03:10PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: Hi all, This is the summary of my +1 maintenance shift: # consul The package in Debian is FTBFS [1], this was reported by me in Ubuntu as well [2]. I added a commit to salsa backporting an upstream patch which fixes the FTBFS,

Re: +1 maintenance report

2021-10-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:22:03AM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 6:34 PM Steve Langasek > wrote: > > +1 Maintenance, Sep 27-Oct 1 > > > ... > > xrdp: > > a warning about unknown archs has been promoted to an error, causing build > > failures on ppc64el and s390x.

Re: +1 maintenance report

2021-10-04 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 6:34 PM Steve Langasek wrote: > > +1 Maintenance, Sep 27-Oct 1 > ... > > xrdp: > a warning about unknown archs has been promoted to an error, causing build > failures on ppc64el and s390x. Without further analysis for correctness, > I've added ppc64el and s390x to the list

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2021-10-01 Thread Paride Legovini
Christian Ehrhardt wrote on 01/10/2021: # Help Gladly this week Paride was so kind to help me and pick a few more +1 tasks. That way some more than what I managed to resolve got done. I assume he will reply to this thread with his own content he worked on this week. Thanks @paride! I

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2021-09-29 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Graham, On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 6:14 PM Graham Inggs wrote: > I think I can answer this now. Previously, python-meshio was writing > and reading STL files in native byte order, so the STL test passed on > big-endian systems. However, the data should have been in > little-endian byte order

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2021-09-27 Thread Graham Inggs
On Thu, 23 Sept 2021 at 17:41, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Whilst working through this, do you happen to know "what" exactly > happened? I think I can answer this now. Previously, python-meshio was writing and reading STL files in native byte order, so the STL test passed on big-endian systems.

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2021-09-24 Thread Graham Inggs
On Thu, 23 Sept 2021 at 19:59, Bryce Harrington wrote: > Looking at the commit Graham points to at the upstream bug, there > appears to be a change from using np.uint32() to .astype(" presumably issue is differences in platform datatype assumptions between > these two routines? In NumPy, the '<'

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2021-09-23 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 09:10:31PM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 7:57 PM Graham Inggs wrote: > > python-meshio > > = > > python-meshio's autopkgtest on s390x has been failing since 4.3.11-1. > > I found bryceh had looked at this previously in LP:

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2021-09-23 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hello, On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 7:57 PM Graham Inggs wrote: > python-meshio > = > python-meshio's autopkgtest on s390x has been failing since 4.3.11-1. > I found bryceh had looked at this previously in LP: #1939057. I then > found utkarsh2102 had reported an issue upstream, so I left

Re: +1 maintenance report

2021-07-09 Thread Heather Ellsworth
On 7/7/21 4:30 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: On 7/6/21 5:07 PM, Heather Ellsworth wrote: June 28 - July 2 (with 1.5 days afk to take care of a sick kiddo) Last week I worked on a few packages: * libpam-alreadyloggedin Ubuntu pulls this package from sid and distributes it without modification.

Re: +1 maintenance report

2021-07-07 Thread Matthias Klose
On 7/6/21 5:07 PM, Heather Ellsworth wrote: > June 28 - July 2 (with 1.5 days afk to take care of a sick kiddo) > > Last week I worked on a few packages: > > * libpam-alreadyloggedin > Ubuntu pulls this package from sid and distributes it without modification. > Debian sid ships gcc 10.2.1 and

Re: +1 Maintenance Report

2021-07-07 Thread Matthias Klose
On 7/5/21 8:15 AM, Chris MacNaughton wrote: > Over Thursday and Friday (1 - 1 July). I worked on a few packages, > starting with minor changes: > > - python-monasca-statsd: I updated the autopkgtest configuration with > the actually python package name to enable minimal autopkgtests > - manila: I

Re: +1 maintenance report

2021-06-21 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Hey there, Le 21/06/2021 à 18:29, Brian Murray a écrit : > I had also looked at tiff / pylibtiff and used import-bug-from-debian, > from ubuntu-dev-tools, to create http://launchpad.net/bugs/1932588 which > I tagged 'update-excuse'. However, looking at the proposed migration > report I don't see

Re: +1 maintenance report

2021-06-21 Thread Brian Murray
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 10:57:57AM +1200, Robert Ancell wrote: > The packages I managed to resolve issues for on the week 14-17th June: > > - xscreensaver - merged from Debian. > - v4l-utils - had one test that had timed out, but worked once retried. > - micropython - diagnosed the build failure,

  1   2   >