On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 23:06 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
Since the two are not compatible with one another, its entirely possible
that people have built and deployed applications on CouchDB 0.10 and
Ubuntu 10.04, and would be extremely upset if we shoved an update into
the archive that broke
]] Rodney Dawes
(I've trimmed the Cc list, I expect people to read either -devel or
u1-users-)
Hi,
| The problem with shipping couchdb 1.0 as a separate binary package (or
| set thereof), means that it's no longer a simple SRU to 10.04. We would
| also need to provide an SRU for desktopcouch
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 12:10 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
Also, why would 10.10 need to be updated in any way if it already
supports the newer protocol?
In 10.10 and 11.04, we already ship CouchDB 1.0. Why should users
continue to have two versions installed after an upgrade to either of
those
On 11/27/2010 09:55 PM, Rodney Dawes wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 12:10 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
Also, why would 10.10 need to be updated in any way if it already
supports the newer protocol?
In 10.10 and 11.04, we already ship CouchDB 1.0. Why should users
continue to have two versions
Rodney Dawes rodney.da...@canonical.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 12:10 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
Also, why would 10.10 need to be updated in any way if it already
supports the newer protocol?
In 10.10 and 11.04, we already ship CouchDB 1.0. Why should users
continue to have two versions
