Re: Change unattended-upgrades from Depends to Recommends on ubuntu-server-minimal

2022-01-12 Thread Dan Streetman
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 6:12 PM Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > So I think we should probably change the server-minimal seed to only > recommend, not depend, on unattended-upgrades. Changing to a hard dependency > was not intended when I wrote that seed and a change like this should > probably

Ongoing autopkgtest-cloud armhf maintenance

2022-01-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Hi all, we discovered some issues we are currently addressing. This is mostly a mental note for me to keep track of where I leave this today, but it might be interesting to read for others. At first, we found that out of 11 lxd armhf workers - 1 corrupted its lxd database after running out of

Re: Change unattended-upgrades from Depends to Recommends on ubuntu-server-minimal

2022-01-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 09:40:32AM -0600, John Chittum wrote: > From Steve: > > > First, I think unattended-upgrades should be directly seeded everywhere; > > its inclusion in the images should not be a side-effect of including > > software-properties. > On one hand, I generally agree with this

Re: Change unattended-upgrades from Depends to Recommends on ubuntu-server-minimal

2022-01-12 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
LXD images called "Ubuntu Server" should behave as similarly as possible to bare metal images called "Ubuntu Server". Unless there is a documented technical reason for the delta, I suspect the difference is a consequence of org boundaries and should be revisited. There is definitely a need