Re: Should we change the behaviour of -P for lsblk in util-linux for Jammy?

2022-02-17 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 01:00:07PM +1300, Matthew Ruffell wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for a bit of advice about landing a new feature in util-linux, as > things have gotten a little complicated, and with feature freeze looming, a > second opinion would be much appreciated. > > e.g. lsblk -P

Re: /boot disk partition size

2022-02-17 Thread Ian Bruntlett
Hi, Quick question. I'm using an install of Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS x86_64 with one partition for / and another partition for swap. All my /boot files are in a subdirectory of my / partition. My drive is 1TB in size. Am I doing something wrong? TIA, Ian -- -- ACCU - Professionalism in

Re: /boot disk partition size

2022-02-17 Thread Michael Mikowski
Hi Everyone: Aaron: On an encrypted Ubuntu system, the EFI partition mounted on /boot/efi is 512M too. But here we are talking about the /boot partition which is distinct. It is typically 705M and formatted with ext4, although subsequent released will likely be larger. The question here is by how

Should we change the behaviour of -P for lsblk in util-linux for Jammy?

2022-02-17 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi all, I'm looking for a bit of advice about landing a new feature in util-linux, as things have gotten a little complicated, and with feature freeze looming, a second opinion would be much appreciated. util-linux 2.37.2 in Jammy has introduced some new behaviour for lsblk and similar tools

Re: Ubuntu bug reporting for snaps (was: Should we remove chromium-browser from the archive?)

2022-02-17 Thread Olivier Tilloy
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 11:21 PM Brian Murray wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 09:18:41PM +0100, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 8:57 PM Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > > > > > Hey Olivier, thanks for raising the topic! > > > > > > Le 08/02/2022 à 19:33, Olivier Tilloy a écrit : >

Re: /boot disk partition size

2022-02-17 Thread eeickmeyer
Hi Everyone, Just forwarding this since it's still getting moderated. I talked to Mike and he didn't mean for it to sound snarky in any way in the 3rd paragraph with the reference to car safety belts, and he wanted to apologize. I'd very much like to encourage participation in this thread,