Re: Revisiting default initramfs compression

2022-03-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:24:55PM +, Dave Jones wrote: > Hi Michael (and others), > > Julian's summarised this near perfectly, but I'll try and add a little > detail from the data I've gathered [1] (with others' generous help, in > particular Heinrich for the RISC-V bits): > > On Wed, Mar

Re: Revisiting default initramfs compression

2022-03-10 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 12:10:39PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:24:55PM +, Dave Jones wrote: [snip] Firstly I actually think lz4 -2 is probably the ideal level for that compressor. There's a large difference in compression performance between lz4 -1 and lz4

[ubuntu-studio-devel] LiveFS ubuntustudio/focal/amd64 failed to build on 20220310

2022-03-10 Thread steve . langasek
etc/ca-certificates/update.d... done. RUN: /usr/share/launchpad-buildd/bin/in-target buildlivefs --backend=lxd --series=focal --arch=amd64 LIVEFSBUILD-331931 --project ubuntustudio-dvd --datestamp 20220310 --proposed Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information

[ubuntu-studio-devel] LiveFS ubuntustudio/jammy/amd64 failed to build on 20220310

2022-03-10 Thread steve . langasek
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/jammy/ubuntustudio/+build/331932 RUN: /usr/share/launchpad-buildd/bin/builder-prep Kernel version: Linux ubuntu 5.4.0-104-generic #118-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 2 19:02:41 UTC 2022 x86_64 Buildd toolchain package versions: