The following may be of interest to some folks here. Since Ubuntu (by way
of Debian) relies on the FHS to ensure consistent policy of how our
filesystem is put together, a healthy FHS spec is important to us. If
you're interested, please subscribe to the mailing list to help make sure
Ubuntu's
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Evan Dandrea e...@ubuntu.com wrote:
While we have a set of unit tests and a continuous integration system doing
system testing of the installer, we ultimately have no idea what the failure
rate is in the real world.
Without this information, we have no means
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 11:44 +0100, Evan Dandrea wrote:
While we have a set of unit tests and a continuous integration system doing
system testing of the installer, we ultimately have no idea what the failure
rate is in the real world.
Without this information, we have no means of actually
On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 06:44:26 AM Evan Dandrea wrote:
While we have a set of unit tests and a continuous integration system doing
system testing of the installer, we ultimately have no idea what the
failure rate is in the real world.
Without this information, we have no means of actually
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Jussi Schultink juss...@ubuntu.com wrote:
The information gathered could also give us an idea of how many
installations we are doing as well, which is useful. Do you plan to
implement this only for ubiquity or for the alternate install as well?
I don't want to
On Tuesday, May 17, 2011 11:43:25 AM Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 09:31:59AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
While I believe you are trying to solve an important problem, I don't
think this is the right way to go about it. I do not think a design the
phones home by default is
It seems like a great thing to try to measure.
1- I wonder if it would be possible to have just one single checkbox
contribute anonymous non-personal technical information to help
improve Ubuntu that covers both the installer and the later use of
other programs. If there's only one box for all
I got your point and I agree with you now :-) but I think we should
take a look on it later and define default gestures for the main
applications.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Harald Sitter apachelog...@ubuntu.com wrote:
2011/5/17 Rodrigo Belém rclbe...@gmail.com:
Would't it work on
2011/5/17 Rodrigo Belém rclbe...@gmail.com:
I got your point and I agree with you now :-) but I think we should
take a look on it later and define default gestures for the main
applications.
Good point, I'll add a todo item for that.
regards,
Harald
--
kubuntu-devel mailing list
Hi Scott,
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 09:31:59AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
You knew you'd get this response eventually ...
:-)
While I believe you are trying to solve an important problem, I don't think
this is the right way to go about it. I do not think a design the phones
home
by
Without commenting on the privacy / merit of the proposal etc...
I don't think you need a guid.
Just two counters:
- started an install
- first login after an install where this machine successfully
register the 'started an install' counter.
divide the two and you have (with some noise) the
Bryce Harrington schreef op di 17-05-2011 om 10:16 [-0700]:
Would you be open to including one more uuid return, following the
first login attempt? I know it probably doesn't matter for a ubiquity
perspective, but there are several classes of issues that result in a
bootable but unusable
LinkedIn
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- Paulo
Paulo Silva
Independent Graphic Design Professional
Portugal
Confirm that you know Paulo Silva
https://www.linkedin.com/e/-31usie-gnsl6sei-4p/isd/2905091139/gHE-3MgB/
--
(c) 2011, LinkedIn
13 matches
Mail list logo
