On 8/4/20 10:31 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 12:05:10PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 at 10:54, Michael Hudson-Doyle >> <michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> I noticed golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v2 times out on armhf, filed >>> https://github.com/square/go-jose/issues/326. > >>> Then I looked at the icu transition. > >>> 0ad fails to build due to gcc-10, I found the fix for this upstream and >>> backported it. > >>> I retried some ucto builds which appeared to have run before a build >>> dependency had been built (maybe fallout from the build farm outage). >>> And retried "frog" builds when these completed. > >>> doxygen autopkgtests are failing because the json-c in proposed has >>> moved its Doxyfile. > >>> multipath-tools has britney complaining about impossible depends -- >>> turns out its udebs are still in main but its dependencies are now in >>> universe. Apparently a bunch of udebs turned up on component mismatches >>> and got demoted, but shouldn't have. They got repromoted again and if >>> they appear on mismatches again someone should debug it :) (or mass >>> demote all udebs to universe or stop building or at least publishing >>> udebs or or ...) > >> I'm not sure. > >> kpartx-udeb & multipath-udeb themselves are up for demotion. Unless >> the reports I'm looking at are old. So it shouldn't be a problem.... >> Or as you say repromotion was incomplete. > >> Imho we should just demote all of udebs to the universe en masse. > > In general this is what we're doing, however this is driven by > components-mismatches, and I'm also inspecting cases of source demotions to > see whether these are Ubuntu-specific packages which should be removed as no > longer used, instead of demoted. > > In the case of multipath-tools, the udebs are listed as candidates for > demotion in the release pocket and NOT in the proposed pocket. This is why > it wouldn't be an immediate obvious candidate for demotion. However I don't > see anything that explains why it's being kept in main in -proposed, so I'm > going to demote in both pockets and see if that gives us more information.
I did that on Monday for all udebs in both the proposed and release mismatches reports (comm -12), then reverted that on Tuesday because it broke some image building, requested by Dimitri and Iain. Matthias -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
