Re: Updating QtWebKit to 5.2

(cc’ing David and Alex who may want to comment) On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Olivier Tilloy olivier.til...@canonical.com wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Dmitry Shachnev mity...@ubuntu.com wrote: Hi all, I would very much like to update qtwebkit-opensource-src to version

Re: Firefox ESR package is really needed

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Nrbrtx wrote: > Dear all! > > Do you have any news about packaging Firefox ESR in supported Ubuntu? This has been discussed this week in New York, and the desktop team doesn't have the resources to commit to packaging and maintaining Firefox

Re: New Ubuntu Core Developer - Simon Quigley

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 10:27 PM Simon Quigley wrote: > > Today, I was voted to be an Ubuntu Core Developer by the Ubuntu > Developer Membership Board (a board which I already sit on, so I'm > taking care of myself here). I now have upload rights to the entire > Ubuntu archive. Congrats Simon!

Re: New Ubuntu Core Developer - Andreas Hasenack

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 7:54 PM Lukasz Zemczak wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Please congratulate Andreas on his today's successful Ubuntu Core > Developer application! Great to have you on the team. Congrats Andreas! -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings

Re: New Ubuntu Core Developer - Tiago Stürmer Daitx

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 5:43 AM Simon Quigley wrote: > > Yesterday (Monday) Tiago was approved as an Ubuntu Core Developer by the > Ubuntu Developer Membership Board. He now has upload rights to the > entire Ubuntu archive. Congratulations Tiago! -- ubuntu-devel mailing list

Re: chromium-browser epoch bump for transitional package?

On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 2:47 AM Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 01:31:54PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > > In doing SRU reviews today, I came across LP: #1889106 which is a > > request for a no-change rebuild to bump the version so it beats the > > versions presented in previous

Re: Running autopkgtests from PPA on real infrastructure

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 1:07 PM Lukas Märdian wrote: > > Hello all, > > I'm currently working on a problem where an autopkgtest works fine in local > autopkgtest testrunners (QEMU based), but it fails in different ways on the > real Ubuntu autopkgtest infrastructure [0] (networking related

Re: Running autopkgtests from PPA on real infrastructure

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 5:13 PM Iain Lane wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 03:53:01PM +0200, Lukas Märdian wrote: > > * Upload your package (incl. debian/tests/*) to your PPA > > * Get a core-dev/MOTU to trigger the test for you, via this URL scheme: > >

Re: +1 maintenance status − June 18-19

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 7:59 PM Brian Murray wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 08:03:56PM +0200, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > I was on +1 maintenance shift this Thursday and Friday. > > This is what I managed to get through: > > &

+1 maintenance status − July 09-10

Hello everyone, I was on +1 maintenance shift last Thursday and Friday. I focused solely on node-* test failures that are blocking the migration of nodejs 12.18.1. I got side-tracked quite a bit, so I didn't manage to do as much as I intended, but I'm going to continue poking at it throughout the

+1 maintenance status − June 4-5

Hello everyone, I was on +1 maintenance shift this Thursday and Friday. This was my first time doing this, so a part of my shift was spent reading documentation, and getting familiar with the tools and processes. Many thanks to seb128 for mentoring me through it. Following is a summary of what I

Re: New Ubuntu Core Developer - Lukas Märdian

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 6:17 PM Lukasz Zemczak wrote: > > Hello everyone! > > We are pleased to announce that at today's DMB meeting slyon has been > accepted into the Ubuntu Core Developer family! Welcome aboard! Congratulations Lukas, and welcome aboard! -- ubuntu-devel mailing list

+1 maintenance report

Hello everyone, I was scheduled for two full days of +1 maintenance duty this week (Wednesday and Thursday), but other urgent tasks meant I only did it part-time and spread over 3 days. Here are some notes of what I looked into and the actions I took (also including notes from a partial shift I

+1 maintenance report

Hello everyone, This week I focused my 2-day shift on ruby-rugged, which is the last blocker preventing libgit2 from migrating. I had no prior experience with ruby so I learnt a few things along the way. I uploaded https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-rugged/1.1.0+ds-3ubuntu2, which fixed

Re: +1 maintenance report

On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:00 PM Olivier Tilloy wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > This week I focused my 2-day shift on ruby-rugged, which is the last > blocker preventing libgit2 from migrating. > I had no prior experience with ruby so I learnt a few things along the way.

Re: Application for Core Developer (gunnarhj)

On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 5:36 PM Robie Basak wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:19:48PM +0100, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: > > I hereby apply to become a Core Developer. > > The DMB voted today to approve Gunnar's application. Congratulations, > Gunnar! Congratulations Gunnar! -- ubuntu-devel

Re: Why is LibreOffice Startcenter hidden from Gnome?

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:45 PM Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: > > On 2021-03-11 20:17, Coburn Ingram wrote: > > I looked at the issue you referenced. > > > > It seems to me this is a simple confusion of terms. > > I don't think so. Both Jeremy and Olivier know how it works. The > discussion they had

+1 maintenance report

Hello everyone, This week I did a 2-day shift, following is a report of what I accomplished. libsndfile was FTBFS on riscv64, I filed https://launchpad.net/bugs/1917650 and uploaded https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsndfile/1.0.31-1ubuntu1, which built and migrated successfully. gjs

Re: Should we remove chromium-browser from the archive?

On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 7:33 PM Olivier Tilloy wrote: > > The chromium-browser package has been a "transitional" package that > installs the chromium snap since Ubuntu 19.10. Full-fledged deb > packages are still being built for 18.04. > > The question of whether

Re: Ubuntu bug reporting for snaps (was: Should we remove chromium-browser from the archive?)

On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 11:21 PM Brian Murray wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 09:18:41PM +0100, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 8:57 PM Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > > > > > Hey Olivier, thanks for raising the topic! > > > > > &g

Should we remove chromium-browser from the archive?

The chromium-browser package has been a "transitional" package that installs the chromium snap since Ubuntu 19.10. Full-fledged deb packages are still being built for 18.04. The question of whether to remove this transitional package from the archive altogether has come up, so I'm sharing it here

Re: Should we remove chromium-browser from the archive?

(>= 78) | firefox (>= 78) | chromium | chromium-browser | epiphany-browser At this point it looks like the benefits of keeping the package in the archive largely outweigh those of removing it anyway. > On 2/8/22 14:29, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: > > Hi Olivier! > > On 2022-02

Re: Should we remove chromium-browser from the archive?

On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 7:45 PM Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > On 2/8/22 19:33, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > > The chromium-browser package has been a "transitional" package that > > installs the chromium snap since Ubuntu 19.10. Full-fledged deb > > packag

Re: Should we remove chromium-browser from the archive?

On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 8:30 PM Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: > > Hi Olivier! > > On 2022-02-08 19:33, Olivier Tilloy wrote: > > The chromium-browser package has been a "transitional" package that > > installs the chromium snap since Ubuntu 19.10. Full-fledged deb

Re: Should we remove chromium-browser from the archive?

On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 10:44 AM Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 4:13 AM Olivier Tilloy > wrote: > > > 18.04 users upgrading to 22.04 will expect that their profile > > > (bookmarks, cookies, passwords, settings) from the full chromium pa

Re: Ubuntu bug reporting for snaps (was: Should we remove chromium-browser from the archive?)

On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 8:57 PM Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > Hey Olivier, thanks for raising the topic! > > Le 08/02/2022 à 19:33, Olivier Tilloy a écrit : > > - a custom apport hook that collects additional information about the > > snap and its dependencies > > I

Re: systemd-oomd issues on desktop

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 1:49 AM Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 01:00:45PM -0400, Nick Rosbrook wrote: > > In the reports I refer to above, applications are being killed due to > > (1). In practice, the SwapUsedLimit might be too easy to reach on > > Ubuntu, largely because