I would have to agree on not hearing many Ubuntu (even other distros)
sounds. I would suggest forwarding this to the Ubuntu-ART ML or getting in
contact with someone from Artwork Team. Though I am unsure if audio artwork
is their realm.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behal
M G wrote:
> There are basically two types of x86 Ubuntu offered at present - 32
> bit and 64 bit. Most new CPUs sold today are 64 bit, so that is where
> the future of Ubuntu ought to be. 32 bit is for older (legacy)
> hardware or for specialised uses such as low power or embedded
> applications.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 01:49:27AM -0400, M G wrote:
> Subject: Intrepid compatibility with C3 CPUs #5212
Are you referring to a particular bug here?
https://launchpad.net/bugs/5212 is something quite different.
> The C3 is still listed as a current product on the Via web site.
> However, if Wiki
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Luke L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't concern me much, since I disable those sounds first thing!
>
> Remember that people use their laptops and take them to public places. I
> think the sound Cory attached is more 'mellow' for a logon sound than the
> current
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Luke L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since Firefox auto-updates, getting 3.1 in wouldn't be an issue anyway.
Everything auto-updates. And that depends on whether it gets in or
not. Firefox's built-in auto-update does not work on Ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mai
Vishal, you can see all packages for intrepid by searching them in
packages.ubuntu.com. Eclipse is at 3.2, and Wine is at 1.0.
As for OOo 3, I would like to see it ready for Intrepid, but I can
understand if it isn't. the beta 1 didn't give me any trouble in Windows
several months ago, which is th
Doesn't concern me much, since I disable those sounds first thing!
Remember that people use their laptops and take them to public places. I
think the sound Cory attached is more 'mellow' for a logon sound than the
current attention grabber. In short, I like it.
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Co
2008/8/31 Alexander Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> A lot of people seem to misunderstand why Fx 3.0 was included in 8.04
> when it wasn't final. The reason was that we had to support it for 3
> years, so Fx 2 was not an option. As Intrepid is not LTS, we only need
> to keep supporting 3.0 for 18 mont
2008/8/31 Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> FF 3.1 won't be final in time for intrepid (not even close)
Just like Firefox 3.0 was not final in time for Hardy? Not a troll,
but an honest question regarding the 'not ready' status of upstream
software.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
ht
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (cant tell anything about ooo)
>
> I didnt know that FF 3.1 by default was actually perceived as an
> option by anyone until this mail reached my inbox.
>
> FF 3.1 won't be final in time for intrepid (not even close), and
A lot of people seem to misunderstand why Fx 3.0 was included in 8.04
when it wasn't final. The reason was that we had to support it for 3
years, so Fx 2 was not an option. As Intrepid is not LTS, we only need
to keep supporting 3.0 for 18 months, which is fine.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing li
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 11:30:23AM +0530, Vishal Rao wrote:
> What is the latest status of the possibility of including OOo 3 and FF
> 3.1 by default in Intrepid?
>
(cant tell anything about ooo)
I didnt know that FF 3.1 by default was actually perceived as an
option by anyone until this mail re
12 matches
Mail list logo
