Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
...
I see that when bad things about ubuntu are pointed out, typically you
only get defensive answers by users. They all seem not to understand
that, at least in my case, I usually *do* defend ubuntu against too easy
critics, just like you. But if the problem exists,
Il giorno gio, 14/05/2009 alle 02.47 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs ha scritto:
User-defined commands - Tick;
RefTex - bibliography completion - Tick
preview-latex - Why do I need it when I have auto-refresh of Xdvi
But ok =D
Please let us stop this. I know emacs. 10 years ago I was a
Il giorno gio, 14/05/2009 alle 21.26 +0900, Emmet Hikory ha scritto:
Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
(and sometimes different
priorities for the same package: seeking new features until personal use
cases are addressed, and then wanting the package to be stable from that
point forward).
Very good
There was discussion about moving from the previously sysklogd to
syslog-ng/rsyslogd in the last development cycle, but we missed the
window.
On jaunty, I find that rsyslogd eats 1.5MB of memory, versus .5MB for
syslog-ng (which I find better for other reasons) [1]. Note that both
are less than
Regressions occur in Ubuntu releases. As mentioned elsewhere, this is
to be expected, and may be for the best. But if you've spent 6 months
getting Intrepid just how you like it, starting over again with Jaunty
can be a pain.
So how about we offer the user the opportunity to `cp -l /bin /etc
On Thursday 14 May 2009 9:07:25 am Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
I became involved with the developement and then gave up, when I
recognised that ubuntu needed manpower.
More volunteers are needed, so I'll stop volunteering...what?
I may decide to get back to contributing patches at least in the
Il giorno gio, 14/05/2009 alle 09.54 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan ha scritto:
I became involved with the developement and then gave up, when I
recognised that ubuntu needed manpower.
More volunteers are needed, so I'll stop volunteering...what?
Just a badly constructed sentence: I
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:55 AM, John McCabe-Dansted gma...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAICT Amarok didn't just have a couple of annoying bugs, it was never
really ready for widespread use. According to Jeff Mitchel We've
maintained that until 2.1, most users should stick with 1.4.
Unfortunately, just
