You completely misunderstand the point of my message it seems. And then
go and say that I don't understand stuff.
And providing such standard (wikipedia) links is just very
condescending, you know.
If the halt-on-fstab-problem is Ubuntu related, then it is clear my
message should have been
Colin Law schreef op 28-03-2016 18:38:
Are these not issues for upstream Nautilus developers to consider
rather than Ubuntu?
The point is really that if people "downstream" *care* their voice
becomes stronger 'upstream'.
If a number of people downstream say "hey, yes this is a great idea"
Are these not issues for upstream Nautilus developers to consider
rather than Ubuntu?
Colin
On 28 March 2016 at 04:11, Dale Amon wrote:
> I like the way NeXTstep did it. If you drag an icon
> from the Workspace Manager to a shell or into Emacs,
> it 'drops' as the full path name
I like the way NeXTstep did it. If you drag an icon
from the Workspace Manager to a shell or into Emacs,
it 'drops' as the full path name of the item you
dragged.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
Bart, you're confusing Ubuntu defaults with Linux.
Ubuntu is a Linux distro, but it's not Linux.
1. Ubuntu isn't the only distro, some distros have different defaults,
e.g. boot not necessarily hangs, if something in fstab isn't available.
2. FHS compliance is a good thing and you seemingly
Not sure if this list is getting read much but:
- in a default install (now Talking Kubuntu 15.10) everything works but
a small thing has to go wrong for the system to fail entirely
- this is not a resilient thing and it should get changed if the system
is to be anything that allows people
I just want to say that such a thing can make a great difference if it
is included by default.
Everything or anything that needs a customary script to be installed
kinda increases the investment required to use the feature by 8000%.
And if you have a 100 such things you want to change, it