On Wed, 8 May 2019 17:46:01 +0200,
Jörg Abel wrote:
>The wallpaper Tramonto_a_Scalea_by_Renatvs88.jpg
>Is found under
>https://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/all/ubuntu-wallpapers-wily/filelist
> But in the Copyright on the Right side there is this Picture not
> named. Is this a mistake or does this
Hi, Gunnar,
Tested editing /etc/profile.d/modules.sh to source /usr/share/modules/init/bash
by default i.e. commented out the line
. /usr/share/modules/init/sh
and put in
. /usr/share/modules/init/bash
but it was not sufficient. Apparently dash comes in at a later stage.
Cheers,
Hi, Gunnar!
No. I doubt that modules.sh is a Debian invention. A file with the exact same
content lives in the subdirectory .../init/ of the installation if done from
Sourceforge sources for the same version 4.1.1. There, however, its name is
profile.sh and it is suggested that a symlink
The wallpaper Tramonto_a_Scalea_by_Renatvs88.jpg
Is found under
https://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/all/ubuntu-wallpapers-wily/filelist
But in the Copyright on the Right side there is this Picture not named. Is
this a mistake or does this Picture not have the same Licence? What is the
Licence
Following up on this, it has been a couple weeks since the EE cycle
started, but there doesn't seem to be any activity on that patch. Could it
have something to do with the package seemingly tracking the GDB git
version directly instead of Debian's packaging of it?
Jonathan
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019
On 2019-05-08 14:07, Gösta Ljungdahl wrote:
Hi, Gunnar,
Tested editing /etc/profile.d/modules.sh to source
/usr/share/modules/init/bash by default i.e. commented out the line
. /usr/share/modules/init/sh
and put in
. /usr/share/modules/init/bash
but it was not sufficient. Apparently dash
