On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Vernon Cole vernondc...@gmail.com wrote:
I manage many Ubuntu systems, and I often forget which ones are running 64
bit version of Ubuntu, and which are 32 bit.
It would be really nice if there were a quick way to tell. The System tab
on System Monitor would
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 4:21 AM, rosea.grammostola
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
1) Fedora, OpenSuse and Debian etc. aren't building their distro especially
for this group.
Not being involved with Fedora or openSUSE closely, I can't comment on
them, but Debian doesn't ship a desktop
Hi,
On Jun 24, 2011 7:10 AM, rosea.grammostola rosea.grammost...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
A group of (professional) Linuxaudio users prefer to have a system without
Pulseaudio. How nice Pulseaudio can be for 'consumer audio', it can be a
pain on a professional audio system. That's why some people
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Peng Yu pengyu...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm wondering if anybody can get JAGS updated on lucid. Thanks.
Please see
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports#How%20to%20request%20new%20packages
-Dan
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Francis Bolduc fbol...@gmail.com wrote:
... I'm a software developer and I like to have
updated development tools every 6 months ...
I'm left with this dilemma. Neither Unity nor GNOME Shell fits my
needs. What am I going to do in 6 months?
A false dichotomy.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Tony Atkinson
tatkinson...@googlemail.com wrote:
Tomorrow, I'm going to be compiling a vanilla .38 kernel, to try and
narrow down exactly where the issue with the natty kernel is, but
thought I'd post here first, prior to filing a bug, just to make sure
this
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 2:55 PM, pere lengo perele...@hotmail.com wrote:
I've tried to make a rule for udev, but it doesn't work because in version
10.0.4 the OPTION ignore_device has been removed.
Rationale given in the release notes for udev 148, see
http://lwn.net/Articles/364728/
Would
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Fergal Daly fer...@esatclear.ie wrote:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pymtp/+bug/575091
is 4 months old, has 2 patches to fix this library (which is
completely broken in lucid) but no one on the Ubuntu side has
responded,
Alas, I'm sure this is due
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Fergal Daly fer...@esatclear.ie wrote:
The first attachment is a patch (not a new version of the file) and
has no extraneous whitespace.
I see only one attachment for that bug report,
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Yaniv Aknin ya...@aknin.name wrote:
(2) Due to unknown reasons, removing the blacklist is insufficient to return
PC speaker functionality, as can be seen at #398161 and especially #486154.
pcspkr doesn't drive all hardware, and the emergence of HDA (and
Daniel Chen writes:
Fortunately, one can reenable the beep driver at
runtime via a sysfs echo.
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Akkana Peck akk...@shallowsky.com wrote:
Could you elaborate on that? I'm not having much luck googling,
just a few people saying they couldn't find a command
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Fergal Daly fer...@esatclear.ie wrote:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sawfish/+bug/433358
Thanks for bringing this bug to our attention. I have taken ownership
of this report, have isolated a git changeset, and will be working
through a
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Danny Piccirillo
danny.picciri...@ubuntu.com wrote:
* This would require supporting the linux libre kernel (it doesn't have to
be by default, but the option should be available.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
No. It
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Volovikov Taras wizard160...@mail.ru wrote:
Which version of the kernel you plan to include in Ubuntu 10.10?
I believe that if you want to use btrfs, the better it will be 2.6.35 or
later.
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2010-May/030764.html
--
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:53 PM, I.E.G. kopci...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for the rambling , non technical dissertation but I felt we the
users(if I dare speak for more than myself) needed to be heard .
For a long time I have felt that there is an artificial disconnect
between users and
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:03 AM, sam tygier samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
The solution to bugs like this is to make apport upload the equalizer
settings (i think it already does with the volume settings).
It uploads the *alsa* mixer perspective, which may be desynced from
pulse's idea of those
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:36 AM, sam tygier samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
is it technically possible/easy to upload pulse's state as well?
Sure, pacmd list-sinks.
Best,
-Dan
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Chandru chandru...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been
using https://code.launchpad.net/~psyke83/+junk/pulseaudio-equalizer with
Lucid and found it sufficiently capable. It will be really nice if this can
be included in universe for Maverick and gradually made
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Chandru chandru...@gmail.com wrote:
My suggestion was to just get the app into the official repos initially.
Based on Daniel's reply I've sent a mail to the developer suggesting him to
submit the application.
It would be even more useful to work alongside him
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Conn O'Griofa connogri...@gmail.com wrote:
[1] This branch may be obsolete now that the equalizer is included
upstream by default - I haven't followed developments recently. Here
it is: http://gitorious.org/pulseaudio-equalizer
Right, which is now in the master
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Ryan Oram r...@infinityos.net wrote:
Until the implementation of OSS4 is ready and tested, infinityOS will
continue to use pure ALSA.
How will you determine that the implementation of OSS4 is ready and tested?
Best,
-Dan
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
On May 6, 2010 8:11 PM, Chris Jones chrisjo...@comcen.com.au wrote:
Since upgrading to Lucid, I can no longer use Pulse audio with VLC as it
skips beyond use. I have to configure VLC to putput to ALSA as an
alternative which works perfectly.
Up until Lucid's release, I've had no real big issues
(Grr, Android mail clients)
Have you filed a bug report against the alsa-driver source (or alsa-base
binary) package?
On May 6, 2010 8:11 PM, Chris Jones chrisjo...@comcen.com.au wrote:
Since upgrading to Lucid, I can no longer use Pulse audio with VLC as it
skips beyond use. I have to
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Ryan Oram r...@infinityos.net wrote:
It is 2 years old, but the facts in the article above are still
completely true. PulseAudio has made essentially zero progress in the
last 2 years, which is why it should be abandoned.
I feel I am at least somewhat qualified
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Ryan Oram r...@infinityos.net wrote:
I apologize if I was frank, but problem with PulseAudio is that it
does not always work with existing code.
Such is the pain of new code. We face this continually in ALSA and
PulseAudio alike, and I don't see how any new
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Rene Veerman rene7...@gmail.com wrote:
- soundblaster doesn't work. volume levels are good, card reports no
error (in gui at least), yet no sound leaves the speakers...
The above description is much too vague. Would you please file a bug
report against
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Rene Veerman rene7...@gmail.com wrote:
can i assume 'ubuntu-bug alsa-driver' will include the specs of both
my sound cards?
It will include the necessary information provided that there is not
something more nefarious occurring.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:07 PM, schoappied schoapp...@gmail.com wrote:
We all remembered the failure of Hardy as LTS.
Firstly, I am going to warn you up front that this response will seem
largely defensive, because I have not seen any contributions from you
in Lucid's sound stack integration.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Ralf Eleven ral...@gmx.net wrote:
The voip-function in idjc doesn't work.
It should work like this:
http://www.onlymeok.nildram.co.uk/voip.html
This approach will fail because j-a-c-k has not been repromoted to
main yet, and thus alsa-plugins cannot be compiled
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Larry D'Anna la...@elder-gods.org wrote:
Where can i find the upstream for acl? The package says it's at the xfs
project, but I can't find any source for getfacl/setfacl there. Thanks.
See /usr/share/doc/acl/copyright:
It can be downloaded from
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Larry D'Anna la...@elder-gods.org wrote:
thanks, but I guess what i should have said is, I want to find the maintainer.
I found a bug in it and i want to give him a patch.
Either Nathan Scott nathans at debian dot org or Anibal Monsalve
Salazar anibal at debian
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Larry D'Anna la...@elder-gods.org wrote:
so there's no upstream beyond the debian maintainers?
Please note that one of the maintainers, Nathan, appears to (have)
work(ed) for SGI.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Richard Didd
richard.d...@ttplabtech.com wrote:
Regarding the next release of Ubuntu (Lucid), I was wondering if the most
recent version of Pulse Audio will be included.
Lucid already ships the most current stable-queue branch of PA (which
does not contain the
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Jonathon Fernyhough
j.fernyho...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd second this. I've done some (admittedly unscientific) testing
running two VirtualBox VMs concurrently off the same NTFS disk*
(Karmic and Windows 7 on a Lucid host). With 2009.4.4 there was
significant lag;
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Forest Mars for...@mnn.org wrote:
Taking a look at http://packages.ubunut.com/lucid/graphics/vlc it indicates
the version there is 1.0.4.
Generally, don't rely on packages.uc to be the canonical listing. Use
LP instead:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Shentino shent...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, it recently got the wave-off as now it no longer builds under
Lucid and I'm being asked to test a new upstream version, when I know that
I uploaded 3:4.7.0-1ubuntu1 last night, so if you're willing to respin
your
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Patrick Freundt
patrick.freu...@googlemail.com wrote:
You should not only rant at people like Richard Stallman you also need
to provide patches like him.
I'll ask because the phrasing is ambiguous, and I can't tell whether
my cynicism radar is errant.
Are you
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Ben Okopnik b...@linuxgazette.net wrote:
I tried reporting this bug in Launchpad more about a week back, and
never got any response. Since it's a pretty big one (zip file contents
not showing up), I figured I'd send it here; hopefully, someone finds it
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Dmitry Unruh dmitryun...@googlemail.com wrote:
Why in the repositories of Ubuntu Qt Creator is still version 1.2 and not 1.3?
$ rmadison qtcreator
qtcreator | 1.2.1-3ubuntu1 | karmic/universe | source, amd64, i386
qtcreator | 1.3.0-0ubuntu2 | lucid/universe |
Hi, folks,
[a more complete version of my announcement in #ubuntu-devel on Freenode]
Based on the abysmal feedback that we received for Karmic/9.10
regarding powering down HDA controllers after ten idle seconds[0],
I've reverted the change in the most recent upload of alsa-driver
1.0.22.1 to
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Benedikt Ahrens
benedikt.ahr...@gmx.net wrote:
installation of libghc6-src-exts-dev fails because of unmet dependencies.
Correponding bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-src-exts/+bug/496274
As I commented, for Karmic you need a
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Alain Kalker m...@dds.nl wrote:
The trouble is: IPv6 is coming, whether anyone cares or not. IPv4 is
rapidly running out of addresses, so sooner or later we're going to have
to switch. Gently coaxing users to get acquainted with IPv6 is IMO a
much better idea
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Harry Strongburg lolwut...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone else in favour of adding miredo to the default Ubuntu install?
Why or why not?
Despite using miredo for some time, I propose postponing inclusion of
this package in the default desktop seeds until after
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Tim Hawkins tim.hawk...@me.com wrote:
Given the amount of discussion relating to problems with the nVidia drivers
in Karmic, could this be a factor in this review.?
Given the number of bugs filed incorrectly against the Ubuntu
PulseAudio source package involving
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Christian Schugitsch i...@schugy.de wrote:
Maybe someone has noticed this one:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icewm/+bug/458100
Yes, and I've requested additional information.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Kyle Amadio kyle.ama...@itvss.com.au wrote:
Has anyone else got this problem? - none of my PulseAudio applets work -
none of them
A bit more detail -- e.g., bug reports -- would be useful.
-Dan
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
(Sorry for top-posting; bad MTA)
Have you filed any bugs WRT PA and mpd? AFAICT, those issues are integration
ones, not anything at fault in PA, and there are several workarounds
allowing a user to output to PA through mpd.
As for Adobe Flash, there is anecdotal evidence that nspluginwrapper is
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Paul Smith p...@mad-scientist.us wrote:
time, but this change looks like a dud to me.
Clearly the right way to debug this is to comment out the patch in
debian/series and see why pa_streq() is being passed crap. Anyone with
bt hardware and valgrind up for it?
(MTA constraints)
What do you mean by disabled?
On Oct 15, 2009 8:27 AM, John Vivirito gnomefr...@gmail.com wrote:
I have seen in last few releases that PA gets disabled when i
reboot. This is not due to updates or reboot i dont think
since it happens all the time after updates than reboot.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Thomas Doyle t...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
Today an update of Karmic Usplash causes my Ctrl+Alt+F1-F6 to show
garbled symbols that look like blue Chinese letters and no Login Prompt.
I narrowed it down to usplash by installing updates one at a time and
then
2009/10/10 Lukas Hejtmanek xhejt...@ics.muni.cz:
not so fast. gnome-settings-daemon tries to connect to pulse. multimedia keys
work no more without pulse. gnome-volume-control does nothing without pulse.
I can't reproduce any of these symptoms with PA completely disabled
(no autospawn, PA
2009/10/10 Lukas Hejtmanek xhejt...@ics.muni.cz:
hmm, let me see. ALSA is broken. OK. How do we fix it? Insert new layer
between ALSA and Apps. (PA). Oh no, PA is also broken. (as you stated that PA
sooner or later solves its problems). So I should ask, why should we fix PA
rather
than fix
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Vincenzo Ciancia cian...@di.unipi.it wrote:
The real problem that nobody seemed ever to be getting is that when you
introduce huge regressions, then you probably should 1) either not
distribute the software yet 2) or put more energy into bug fixing for
the
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Martin Olsson mn...@minimum.se wrote:
Sound was broken for me in all releases before hardy and then
in hardy it worked _perfectly_ with Skype, Flash etc. Sound
Again, just because it worked for you does not mean that it wasn't
broken. If you care to look outside
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Remco remc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 14:40, Daniel Chen seven.st...@gmail.com wrote:
The sad thing is that we could have shipped a two-line
change to /etc/pulse/default.pa that would have alleviated nearly all
of the (users') showstoppers
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Remco remc...@gmail.com wrote:
Why has it not been changed in Hardy? Did it break other stuff?
Firstly, it was too late to make the change. Secondly, it breaks with
upstream's (PA's) adamant policy that (ALSA) hw: be used by default,
not dmix: or dsnoop:.
--
2009/10/7 Lukas Hejtmanek xhejt...@ics.muni.cz:
why there is now hard-coded pulse audio in Ubuntu/Karmic?
Simply, this approach is upstream's, and it makes sense resource-wise
to follow upstream.
More bluntly, if you'd like to contribute a novel audio framework to
Linux, particularly Ubuntu,
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Null Ack null...@gmail.com wrote:
I dont think the ordinary user cares about PulseAudio or other
internal components to their desktops. They just want audio to work.
Definitely agreed.
1. Not delivering reliable audio experiences in production releases of
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Patrick Goetz pgo...@mail.utexas.edu wrote:
7668 pgoetz 20 0 160m 17m 12m S 1 0.5 42:56.50 pulseaudio
Note that you can disable PA's mempool implementation. We also cache
/usr/share/sounds/ubuntu/stereo/* . Of course, from your top (not
really a
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:04 PM, LoonyPhoenixloonyphoe...@gmail.com wrote:
all I liked. Then PCM disappeared and only master volume and per-application
volumes remained, and I had to be careful not to go above 85% when setting
master volume and I was all right. However, now I have to make sure
[Adding ubuntu-devel@, apologies for resulting cross-posts]
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Eric Hedekaraftertheb...@gmail.com wrote:
In Bug #416778 ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416778 ) Loïc Minier has
requested further public discussion on the subject of Jack Audio Server
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:20 AM, George Farrisfarr...@cc.mala.bc.ca wrote:
I'm sure you are aware of this but one never knows. Any comment about
whether this is fixed in Karmic?
Unfortunately, I have not tested this use case (I don't use that
application). Hopefully you will report whether
Hi folks,
Today I updated the PulseAudio snapshot for Karmic in the
ubuntu-audio-dev PPA[0] to 0.9.16-test5[1]. This staged update should
be considered a poll for deciding whether flat volumes[2] should be
shipped enabled by default (in /etc/pulse/daemon.conf). Please respond
to the
Hi Matthew,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Matthew Garrettmj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
I know that this is a very pedantic point, but when distributing kernel
builds (or, indeed, any other GPLed code) it's helpful to include the
source (or a pointer to the source) alongside it
Right, an
Hi all,
Some time ago, I asked[0] for bugs to be reported against Karmic's
sound drivers as we move toward improved power savings. Those of you
running Karmic on HDA hardware should notice improvements in a test
kernel[1]. If you have already filed a bug using the instructions in
[0], please
My experiences in Karmic match Max's.
On Jul 3, 2009 8:36 PM, Max Bowsher m...@f2s.com wrote:
Alexander Sack wrote: On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 03:35:10PM -0700, Dean Loros
wrote: Greetings.
Alexander,
I experienced what you describe above when upgrading from old gdm to new
gdm, *but* when I
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Davyd McColldav...@gmail.com wrote:
Oddly enough, pre-PA, I've never seen any kind of lockup on the SBLive. And
You're lucky. Some revisions of the EMU10k did awful, racy things.
must point out that the latency issue, whilst more pressing for audio
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Danny
Piccirillodanny.picciri...@ubuntu.com wrote:
PulseAudio is actually a very bad choice in the long term due to horrible
latency and lower sound quality, and that we should work to use OSS v4. It's
a long read but seems to be worth it. What do others think
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Davyd McColldav...@gmail.com wrote:
I've had an SB Live for ages. One of the most redeeming features of this
card is hardware mixing. Meaning that I didn't care about OSS lockups or
ALSA's dmix.
Too bad that hardware multiopen support comes at a price: all
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Martin Owensdocto...@gmail.com wrote:
Although getting the script updated to download the correct version
depending on your arch would probably be a better bet, I bet it's also
set to be i386 only too. A more clever script would prevent confusion I
think.
The
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Danny
Piccirillodanny.picciri...@ubuntu.com wrote:
No exception can be made there? How have exceptions been made before? Is
there some way to work around that?
Exceptions to the redistribution terms must be granted by Adobe.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Danny
Piccirillodanny.picciri...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Ah, how unfortunate. Would it be impossible to get Adobe to allow this in
time? If we could take the file straight from their website, would that be
allowed?
Regarding whether Adobe will adjust its stance: I
What two libraries? Also, note that flashplugin-installer depends on
ia32-libs, which is unnecessary for the native 64-bit plugin.
On Jun 17, 2009 2:41 PM, Bruce Miller subscr...@brmiller.ca wrote:
I am puzzled by this thread; but then again, I am a user who lurks on this
list, not a developer.
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:18 PM, I wrote:
We expect there will be regressions in the form of audible pops when
the AMPs power down (and/or up). If you experience this symptom in
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Alexandre Strube su...@surak.eti.br wrote:
Continually lowering the volume for,
Hi all,
Luke and I have just pushed a one-line change to 9.10's
/etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base.conf that enables HDA controllers to power
down their amps after ten idle seconds. This change anticipates the
larger power-savings objectives for 9.10.
We expect there will be regressions in the form of
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Markus Hitter m...@jump-ing.de wrote:
In my opinion, this is disappointing. Very disappointing. What is
wrong with Ubuntu's release/fix/backport strategy for such a thing to
happen?
Downstreams should feel free to adopt whatever policies suit them.
(Think
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Vincenzo Ciancia cian...@di.unipi.it wrote:
I hope this will not sound like a complaint.
It does.
The problem
is there, and it's grave.
Grave for whom? For you? For what common use cases? These are things
that are factors to consider when affecting an entire
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Dotan Cohen dotanco...@gmail.com wrote:
I am an end-user with no development experience. Would my input in
testing still be valuable? If so, then how can I start? Simply
pointing me to the relevant documentation for enabling the kernel you
mentioned would be a
78 matches
Mail list logo
