On 2010-07-10 08:15:22 +0100, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
When looking at the maverick package lists at
http://packages.ubuntu.com/maverick/ , we get an error, also searching
for packages in the maverick repos returns nothing, and has done for a
while now.
Known problem and it's being worked on.
On 2010-07-04 17:11:27 +0100, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
At present in maverick, there is an inconsistent upload of the
mercurial-common (1.54-1) and mercurial (1.52-1) packages on amd64,
leading to inability to install it - see
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/m/mercurial/ .
On 2010-06-12 00:10:57 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
Debian aptitude is at 0.6.2.1-2, while ubuntu's aptitude is at
0.4.11.11-1ubuntu10
I don't know why there is such a large version difference though and
how much work needs to be done to merge these two together.
Lucid synced preferrably
On 2010-05-06 21:42:40 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
Debian is not using public gpg servers. Instead they maintain their
own keyring shipped in the debian-keyring package. You cannot add
signatures to that from non-dd's. And DD's are only keeping real
signatures on their keys from key signing
On 2010-03-25 13:10:32 +0100, Rene Veerman wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Michael Bienia mich...@bienia.de wrote:
On 2010-03-24 09:22:45 +0200, Rene Veerman wrote:
- i'm against moving the window buttons to the left. it'll be annoying
AS HELL, having to change a habit that's used
On 2010-03-24 09:22:45 +0200, Rene Veerman wrote:
- had my compiz set to put my 2 screens in a left/right, shared
desktop config. i had a desktop of 3360x1050 on which i put
single-file backgrounds that span both screens.
under lucid, my backgrounds (same file) are zoomed in and what's on
the
On 2010-01-06 11:36:09 +0100, Patrick Freundt wrote:
We dont talk about an unpleasant background color or desired or
unwanted functionality. We talk about a default configuration of a
browser that goes online to download data without my consent. And the
very least to expect is that its
On 2009-11-21 17:37:46 +0100, Markus Hitter wrote:
http://gparted.sourceforge.net/screens/gparted_1_big.jpg
Oh, perhaps you prefer command line disk partitioning over gparted as
well. It's doable and much more flexible :-)
gparted is probably a good GUI (hadn't have to repartition my disk
On 2009-11-15 19:22:16 +0100, Remco wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 23:37 +0800, Christopher Lees wrote:
My favourite method of saving a document was in RiscOS; when you opened
the 'save' dialog, it was just a small window with the document icon, a
filepath and an OK button. When you were
On 2009-08-18 10:18:56 +0200, David MENTRE wrote:
Hi,
For transition to OCaml 3.11.1 in Ubuntu Karmic, the only remaining
package having an issue is why. It fails to build because its
dependency libfloat-coq is not installable:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
On 2009-08-04 13:14:25 -0500, C de-Avillez wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 17:56 +0200, Michael Bienia wrote:
On 2009-08-01 19:49:33 +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote:
When you add a repository to your computer, then remove that repository,
it's not obvious how to downgrade packages
On 2009-08-04 18:28:17 +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote:
You make a good point about breakage when packages are downgraded. But
it seems a little disingenuous for us to bend over backwards to make
unsupported upgrades possible (adding a software sources menu item,
putting PPAs in Launchpad,
On 2009-08-01 19:49:33 +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote:
When you add a repository to your computer, then remove that repository,
it's not obvious how to downgrade packages that are no longer available.
Downgrades are not supported, while in practise they work in most cases.
Offering such a
On 2009-06-12 22:06:20 +0200, David MENTRE wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 20:07, Sylvain Le Gallgil...@debian.org wrote:
I think we are too tigh regarding time. I prefer that Ubuntu ship a good
3.11.0 release than to have to fight for months to get a 3.11.1.
I need to think a bit more
On 2009-06-11 01:25:58 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
When will it happen, by the way? According to [1]:
The syncs are done automatically on daily basis until DIF date.
However, pycaml has been uploaded more that 48 hours ago in sid, and it
has still not been updated in karmic... or maybe
On 2008-07-21 13:36:18 +0100, (``-_-´´) -- Fernando wrote:
If everything else fails, you may ask LP admin if you can have it
initially on a PPA (i dont know the quota limit on PPAs, sorry), and
if it can handle safely, then ask Ubuntu reps to store it.
The initial limit for PPAs is 1 GB but
On 2008-01-20 23:19:58 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I'm not 100% sure it's a good idea, but what about doing the same for
packages which aren't a new upstream release? If the Debian maintainer
uploaded a new debian-specific version, it's likely to be a bug-fixing
upload. It might be harder to
On 2008-01-06 02:15:18 -0500, Paul Dufresne wrote:
One of my new year resolution is to become a not too bad Haskell
programmer in 2008.
That said, I would like to have latest development version of ghc6
(Glasgow Haskell Compiler) which is the most well known Haskell
compiler in Haskell
On 2007-08-31 00:12:41 -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
On this note, I got completely confused by the deadline. I read that
the upstream version freeze deadline was August 30th, so I planned to
upload my packages on the 30th.
I guess you mixed up UpstreamVersionFreeze and NewPackage for Universe
On 2007-07-23 21:15:17 +0530, shirish wrote:
Now obviously this is for debian, do we have something like that for
ubuntu. There are packages which don't have binaries. For instance
these games :-
Why do you have the impression that this package won't work on Ubuntu?
20 matches
Mail list logo
