Kudos for you Matthew. Fonts are a package category which need a GUI
to show some preview images.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:01 AM, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> Colin Law wrote on 26/08/17 18:21:
>>…
>> OK, I see where you are coming from. It never occurred to me that
>>
Colin Law wrote on 26/08/17 18:21:
>…
> OK, I see where you are coming from. It never occurred to me that
> anyone wanting to install libgtk2.0-dev, or similar, would want to use
> a GUI. I assumed everyone used apt for that. Obviously I am wrong.
>…
Fonts are a clear example of packages that
Very helpful (and eye-opening) discussion of installation issues - thanks.
Since it hasn't been mentioned yet, I'll note my favorite, the first install I
make on new systems:
wajig (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wajig) for command-line installs.
It combines the confusing array of apt-* commands
On Sun, 27 Aug 2017 08:47:13 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>Regarding
>https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1551273
>it might be, that by design it only shows apps with a GUI :p.
My apologies, this bug seems to be about another software installer GUI.
It seems to be an
On Sat, 2017-08-26 at 23:10 +0300, Коля Гурьев wrote:
> 26.08.2017 19:16, Nrbrtx пишет:
> > Let's assume that we need to install libgtk2.0-dev from gnome-software.
> > How to do it? Simple search of libgtk2.0-dev produces no results (note:
> > software-center finds and installs this package). Any
On Sun, 27 Aug 2017 01:04:56 +0300, Nrbrtx wrote:
>I have never used auto-apt.
Neither have I. I installed it just in case it should be useful some
day.
>In Debian Stretch it works very stable. It is pre-installed as
>recommendation for Xfce, Cinnamon, MATE, LXQT, LXDE and other desktops
In my
On Sat, 26 Aug 2017, 18:21 Colin Law wrote:
> OK, I see where you are coming from. It never occurred to me that
> anyone wanting to install libgtk2.0-dev, or similar, would want to use
> a GUI. I assumed everyone used apt for that. Obviously I am wrong.
>
I'd add to this
Thank you, Ralf!
> To see into what packages software from upstream is
>split https://tracker.debian.org/ is helpful. Helpful
>is https://packages.ubuntu.com/ in combination with Google.
I'm very familiar with this sites and console utilities - apt-get,
apt-cache, aptitude, dpkg, apt-file
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Nrbrtx wrote:
> I discovered another great tool - Muon Package Manager. It really rocks.
> I'll try to use it as Synaptic replacement.
Please also try gnome-packagekit. (It installs an app named Packages).
One more issue with Synaptic is that
26.08.2017 19:16, Nrbrtx пишет:
Let's assume that we need to install libgtk2.0-dev from gnome-software.
How to do it? Simple search of libgtk2.0-dev produces no results (note:
software-center finds and installs this package). Any other ideas?
gnome-software is a toy for installing nice games
PS:
"auto-apt search Xlib.h" -
http://wiki.linuxquestions.org/wiki/Auto-apt
"sudo auto-apt run ./configure" -
https://www.howtogeek.com/106526/how-to-resolve-dependencies-while-compiling-software-on-ubuntu/
FWIW I only run
tool update
or
tool upd
to upgrade everything, since I wrote a
On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 21:36:36 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>http://www.debiananwenderhandbuch.de/auto-apt.html
The text I found is in English, on the left there is a selection box
were you could chose the language, seemingly the original link is in
German.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 20:32:34 +0300, Nrbrtx wrote:
>>OK, I see where you are coming from. It never occurred to me that
>>anyone wanting to install libgtk2.0-dev, or similar, would want to use
>>a GUI. I assumed everyone used apt for that. Obviously I am wrong.
>lol :)
>
>In other words
>OK, I see where you are coming from. It never occurred to me that
>anyone wanting to install libgtk2.0-dev, or similar, would want to use
>a GUI. I assumed everyone used apt for that. Obviously I am wrong.
lol :)
In other words gnome-software is not a good alternative for
software-center. It's
On 26 August 2017 at 17:16, Nrbrtx wrote:
> IMHO gnome-software is too simplified and stupid as all modern GNOME.
> No options (except of shortcut to software-properties-gtk), no advanced
> search.
> I will not use it. 63% of 88 reviews are negative.
>
>> It has exactly the same
IMHO gnome-software is too simplified and stupid as all modern GNOME.
No options (except of shortcut to software-properties-gtk), no advanced
search.
I will not use it. 63% of 88 reviews are negative.
> It has exactly the same set of s/w available as Synaptic does.
False.
Let's assume that we
On 24 August 2017 at 01:33, Nrbrtx wrote:
> Dear Ubuntu developers!
>
> I'm using Debian since 3.1 and using Ubuntu since 6.06.
> So let me write about installing programs.
>
> As far I can understand here were two methods of software installation:
> 1. apt (apt-get), dpkg,
Thank you for reply, Matthew!
I discovered another great tool - Muon Package Manager. It really rocks.
I'll try to use it as Synaptic replacement.
But please take care about aforementioned bugs. I list them again:
bug 1612948: axi-cache conversion to python3 broke the script (12 users
affected)
Nrbrtx wrote on 24/08/17 01:33:
>…
> As far I can understand here were two methods of software
> installation:
> 1. apt (apt-get), dpkg, aptitude - for advanced users
> 2. synaptic and Ubuntu software-center - for newbies.
Synaptic is fine for what it is, but it is not even close to being “for
Dear Ubuntu developers!
I'm using Debian since 3.1 and using Ubuntu since 6.06.
So let me write about installing programs.
As far I can understand here were two methods of software installation:
1. apt (apt-get), dpkg, aptitude - for advanced users
2. synaptic and Ubuntu software-center - for
20 matches
Mail list logo