Re: why not scim 1.4.9?

2009-06-29 Thread AWASHIRO Ikuya
Hi, On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:59:08 +0200 Siegfried-Angel wrote: > I don't really care about SCIM. I may do the merge, but if anyone else > is interested in it feel free to take it. I will take care and file the LP. Please wait. -- AWASHIRO Ikuya ik...@fruitsbasket.info / ik...@oooug.jp GPG finge

Re: why not scim 1.4.9?

2009-06-26 Thread Siegfried-Angel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 2009/6/26 Colin Watson : > No particular reason; it's on the to-be-merged list > (https://merges.ubuntu.com/main.html), it's just that nobody's got round > to it yet. Siegfried-Angel? I don't really care about SCIM. I may do the merge, but if anyone

Re: why not scim 1.4.9?

2009-06-25 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:05:54AM +0700, Lê Quốc Tuấn wrote: > scim 1.4.9 has released in 2009/4/19 but why ubuntu not include it? No particular reason; it's on the to-be-merged list (https://merges.ubuntu.com/main.html), it's just that nobody's got round to it yet. Siegfried-Angel? -- Colin Wa

why not scim 1.4.9?

2009-06-17 Thread Lê Quốc Tuấn
scim 1.4.9 has released in 2009/4/19 but why ubuntu not include it? debian has include (i don't know why it no info in homepage, it only have info in forum and project page) download: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=108454 it also have new scim-bridge, scim-m17n, ... i thin