However, it seems to me that nobody is getting the point about fake
login screens: if I am an *user* of somebody else's network, how can I
protect myself from another *user* faking a login screen, used as the
only running X application, and stealing my password?
You have evidence that such
On Sunday 15 February 2009 3:12:32 am Dotan Cohen wrote:
No, Jaunty simply won't have C-A-B feature enabled by default. Simple
as that. Release notes doesn't have such speculation as OMG, visual
interface have changed, someone could use it to steal information from
people.
This is a
Dane,
Please see my bug-report on launchpad filed as
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329644
Additionally,
Could someone please explain to me what REISUB is? I have never heard
this term before, and as I said before, I am a programmer by trade, with
better than just basic knowledge
2009/2/15 Mike Jones eternal...@gmail.com:
Could someone please explain to me what REISUB is? I have never heard
this term before, and as I said before, I am a programmer by trade, with
better than just basic knowledge about operating systems and such, so I am a
bit thrown off.
It's the
This is a basic system event that has changed, a system event that has
security and usability implications. Furthermore, this deviates from
the behaviour of every other major Linux distro, and from the
behaviour of Ubuntu itself in previous versions.
False. This is an upstream change.
2009/2/15 Alex Cockell alcock...@eclipse.co.uk:
Umm -please forgive me, but you mention that removing the
Ctrl-Alt-Backspace three-key-salute was proposed for removal two years
ago... Has this been made absolutely clear to preinstall manufacturers
in time for them to print new manuals?
This
On 14/02/2009 Thomas Jaeger wrote:
C-A-B offers no protection against this attack, as users can easily
remap keys. If you don't believe me, run
xmodmap -e 'keycode 22 = '
Therefore, I was completely wrong along the last 10 years (and fancy how
many passwords I gave as a gift to my
On 15/02/2009 Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
the kernel *does* intercept
Alt+SysRq+K as pointed out a billion times already. Seriously, we
have a
userspace and a kernelspace way around this one.
This is obviously not working from X11, so it seems like we don't have a
secure access key under the
Mike Jones wrote:
Additionally,
Could someone please explain to me what REISUB is? I have never
heard this term before, and as I said before, I am a programmer by
trade, with better than just basic knowledge about operating systems and
such, so I am a bit thrown off.
Each letter
Olá Alexander e a todos.
On Friday 13 February 2009 11:16:39 Alexander Sack wrote:
Some repos will want to replace system packages (eg medibuntu)...this
seems incompatible with these requirements.
I am not sure what medibuntu does. Is that a derivate?
Its a 3rd party repo with license
Olá John e a todos.
On Friday 13 February 2009 02:08:35 John Moser wrote:
(read: Firefox RELOADS the tab it was in, it doesn't come back up into the
exact same state it shut down in! This sucks!)
Give TabMix Plus (session saver feature) Firefox addon a try.
it restores everything to me,
Olá Matthew e a todos.
On Friday 13 February 2009 18:27:06 Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
I have no doubt that it could be solved if people put their minds to
it. System Monitor (or a process-specific buset) could reduce the
priority of your other programs whenever it is running, be special-cased
hi,
On Do, 2009-02-12 at 14:48 +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
I'd do something like:
- iterate /sys, looking for the devices
- track to their drivers (either by looking at what's loaded, or
comparing modalias to MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE)
isnt that what MODULES=dep in /etc/initramfs.conf
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
Arguing that something's a security feature without checking that it's
actually a security feature isn't a good plan.
Obviously. But I do think this is a security issue that needs to be
solved. Let's forget the whole
-Original Message-
hi,
On Do, 2009-02-12 at 14:48 +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
I'd do something like:
- iterate /sys, looking for the devices
- track to their drivers (either by looking at what's loaded, or
comparing modalias to MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE)
isnt that what
Re: SysRQ not working. Try it in a virtual terminal and see if that
works (something harmless, like Alt SysRQ M).
For starters, the SysRQ / Print Screen key becomes SysRQ when Alt is
being pressed.
If you change the GNOME keyboard settings you could find different
results. Is it possible that
From: Mike Jones eternal...@gmail.com
Subject: Alt-SysReq-K in some cases nonfunctional.
To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com, dmutt...@gmail.com
Message-ID:
e0512b330902150051l41d272cek3400369c29ba6...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Dane,
Olá Stefan e a todos.
On Sunday 15 February 2009 15:56:32 Stefan Hamminga wrote:
Here is what I've got so far:
for mod in `((lspci -v | grep -i Kernel driver in use: | cut -b 24-)
(lspci -v | grep -i Kernel modules: | cut -b 18-)) | sort -u` ; do
echo `grep $mod $(find -name
-Original Message-
Olá Stefan e a todos.
On Sunday 15 February 2009 15:56:32 Stefan Hamminga wrote:
Here is what I've got so far:
for mod in `((lspci -v | grep -i Kernel driver in use: | cut -b 24-)
(lspci -v | grep -i Kernel modules: | cut -b 18-)) | sort -u` ; do
On Sunday 15 February 2009 12:24:32 pm Dylan McCall wrote:
Re: SysRQ not working. Try it in a virtual terminal and see if that
works (something harmless, like Alt SysRQ M).
For starters, the SysRQ / Print Screen key becomes SysRQ when Alt is
being pressed.
Don't you mean when Fn is being
On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 15:50 -0500, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Sunday 15 February 2009 12:24:32 pm Dylan McCall wrote:
Re: SysRQ not working. Try it in a virtual terminal and see if that
works (something harmless, like Alt SysRQ M).
For starters, the SysRQ / Print Screen key becomes SysRQ
Hi all,
This morning's upload of PulseAudio to jaunty makes two notable changes for the
desktop user:
Firstly, autospawn is now enabled, which means that if the daemon is not
running when the first client attempts to connect, it will be executed
automatically. This step tests a workaround for
22 matches
Mail list logo
