Re: k3b for kde4 in kubuntu jaunty?

2009-03-21 Thread Luka Renko
On Friday 20 March 2009 16:18:25 Vishal Rao wrote: Any chance of k3b-for-kde4 getting into jaunty before the release as part of kubuntu's move to eliminate kde3 deps? Or is it no point waiting for it since it might not be done by April? Or is it too late already with feature freeze past? See

Re: k3b for kde4 in kubuntu jaunty?

2009-03-21 Thread Vishal Rao
(resending since it bounced because i wasnt subscribed to kubuntu-devel, apologies for the spam) On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Vishal Rao vishal...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Luka Renko l...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Friday 20 March 2009 16:18:25 Vishal Rao wrote: Any

Re: k3b for kde4 in kubuntu jaunty?

2009-03-21 Thread Vishal Rao
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Luka Renko l...@ubuntu.com wrote: On Friday 20 March 2009 16:18:25 Vishal Rao wrote: Any chance of k3b-for-kde4 getting into jaunty before the release as part of kubuntu's move to eliminate kde3 deps? Or is it no point waiting for it since it might not be done

Re: Replacing network-offline (old version 2xmonitor) with NM wlan 0% signal strength icon

2009-03-21 Thread Peteris Krisjanis
By the way, as innocent bystander of all this disscussion, I wanted to check out that icon which was replacement of new NM zero signal strength icon (as I understood, design team overlook decision of using it and provided better alternative), but I really can't find it. It doesn't appear in

Re: aufs based upgrade tests

2009-03-21 Thread John McCabe-Dansted
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Alan Pope a...@popey.com wrote: That would fail for users who make one-time changes to their data. For example users who download their mail via pop. If they upgrade using aufs and then proceed to test the new features of their mail client, it might be

Re: Call for Jaunty testers (PulseAudio stability-related)

2009-03-21 Thread Daniel T Chen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Vishal Rao wrote: The install failed with newer version already installed because I earlier updated and got 2.6.28-11 from main. I doubt the hw_ptr fixes are in main, if not, will you build new packages with updated version?

Re: Replacing network-offline (old version 2xmonitor) with NM wlan 0% signal strength icon

2009-03-21 Thread Jan Claeys
Op vrijdag 20-03-2009 om 17:48 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Matthew Paul Thomas: Yep. We're very pleased that there are OEMs selling computers with Ubuntu pre-installed, so that millions more people are using Free Software. And we're happy to accept feedback from those OEMs on problems their

Re: Call for Jaunty testers (PulseAudio stability-related)

2009-03-21 Thread Jan Claeys
Op vrijdag 20-03-2009 om 05:07 uur [tijdzone -0400], schreef Daniel T Chen: We're all aware that the migration to PulseAudio has been less than smooth. I don't need to explain that several glaring audio aberration and stability symptoms remain in current Jaunty. The good news is that there's

Large files under ubuntu do not appear to work

2009-03-21 Thread don fisher
I am running ubuntu 8.10 on a Tyan workstation with 16 cores, 32GB of ram and a 3Ware 8.9TB raid 5 array. Under Fedora, when I run fsck, the output is: Disk /dev/sda: 8999.9 GB, 834099456 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1094179 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Re: Large files under ubuntu do not appear to work

2009-03-21 Thread Surfaz Gemon Meme
2009/3/22 don fisher h...@comcast.net I never got to make one under ubuntu. I could not make a partition above 200GB. parted yielded same small size. I was using xfs under Fedora. sudo mkfs.xfs -b size=4k -d su=64k,sw=7 -i size=2k -l version=2 -f -s size=4k -L raid8 /dev/sda1 don --

Re: Large files under ubuntu do not appear to work

2009-03-21 Thread John McCabe-Dansted
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 12:17 PM, don fisher h...@comcast.net wrote: Disk /dev/sda: 8999.9 GB, 834099456 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1094179 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Rebooting under ubuntu the output is reported as: Disk /dev/sda1: 203.8 GB,