Re: Compile farm for MIPS64/Loongson

2009-07-27 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Kai-Cheung Leungkcle...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Debian is still supporting MIPS64, which the Chinese Loongson chips are compartible with.  And Ubuntu codes are lifted from Debian. I would like to have an unofficial repository for MIPS64/Loongson, at least

Re: The google custom search - perhaps it went there by itself?

2009-07-27 Thread Sebastien Bacher
On sam., 2009-07-25 at 16:45 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote: 1) on this list, nobody knows the answer. I think this is likely. Then, the custom search should be removed from firefox. Nobody knows why it is there. You seem to jump to a weird conclusion, because busy maintainers don't read

Re: The google custom search - perhaps it went there by itself?

2009-07-27 Thread Alan Pope
2009/7/27 Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com: Wouldn't it make sense to rather try contacting the maintainer or the ubuntu mozilla team about the issue or to open a bug on launchpad so you can get a reply from the people doing the changes? ..or read his blog post about it :)

Re: The google custom search - perhaps it went there by itself?

2009-07-27 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il 27/07/2009 10:52, Alan Pope ha scritto: ..or read his blog post about it:) http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/162-What-is-this-Multisearch-thing-in-my-Firefox-about.html (which I can see Vincenzo already has, and has indeed commented on it [assuming that's Vincenzo]). When someone

Re: The google custom search - perhaps it went there by itself?

2009-07-27 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il 27/07/2009 10:46, Sebastien Bacher ha scritto: On sam., 2009-07-25 at 16:45 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote: 1) on this list, nobody knows the answer. I think this is likely. Then, the custom search should be removed from firefox. Nobody knows why it is there. You seem to jump to a weird

Re: The google custom search - perhaps it went there by itself?

2009-07-27 Thread Sebastien Bacher
(could you stop private copying me and reply on the list?) On lun., 2009-07-27 at 12:16 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote: Sebastian: did you notice another message that has been there for one year? How does that change the fact that the people you want to reach might not be reading the list you

Re: The google custom search - perhaps it went there by itself?

2009-07-27 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il 27/07/2009 12:26, Sebastien Bacher ha scritto: (could you stop private copying me and reply on the list?) On lun., 2009-07-27 at 12:16 +0200, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote: Sebastian: did you notice another message that has been there for one year? How does that change the fact that the people

Re: The google custom search - perhaps it went there by itself?

2009-07-27 Thread Remco
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Vincenzo Cianciacian...@di.unipi.it wrote: That's the most universal place that I know where users and developers may meet. Certainly ubuntu-devel is not the right place (maybe it's even moderated?). How can you be sure ubuntu-mozilla developers and maybe M.S.

Re: The google custom search - perhaps it went there by itself?

2009-07-27 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Are you not part of this community? No, I am not a developer. I am part of the broader community of ubuntu users (I do lots of bug reporting). If I write to ubuntu-devel-discuss maybe there is some developer on it, and maybe they can even communicate between each other. But let us stop

Re: The google custom search - perhaps it went there by itself?

2009-07-27 Thread Andrew Sayers
Vincenzo Ciancia wrote: The fact that there is nobody willing to reply (I posted a similar message one year ago, so this is certainly not a matter of time) can mean only two things: 1) on this list, nobody knows the answer. I think this is likely. Then, the custom search should be

Re: The google custom search - perhaps it went there by itself?

2009-07-27 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
I understand that you're annoyed because you feel an issue that's important to you has been ignored for a long time, but venting your feelings to the list is never productive. You are more likely to get useful responses if you focus on constructive areas of debate, and ignore irrelevant

The google custom search

2009-07-27 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
[Please notice the cross-post and use the reply button accordingly] As there were many bugs related to the subject in launchpad, I did not consider the possibility that a separate bug on the phylosophical issue could be filed. I was convinced to do that on IRC. Communication is good. Here I

Re: Call for Testers: Karmic kernel with sound controller powerdown fixes

2009-07-27 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 01:56:46PM -0400, Daniel Chen wrote: [0] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2009-May/008239.html [1] http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~dtchen/test-kernels/powerdown/ I know that this is a very pedantic point, but when distributing kernel builds (or,

Re: The google custom search

2009-07-27 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il 27/07/2009 17:42, Vincenzo Ciancia ha scritto: the forms submitted to ubuntu.com The forms are not submitted to ubuntu.com so that is a non-issue. Changed the bug accordingly. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Missing build dependencies in libdrizzle package

2009-07-27 Thread C.J. Adams-Collier
Hey Monty, etc., $ wget http://launchpad.net/drizzle/trunk/aloha/+download/drizzle-2009.07.1098.tar.gz \ tar xfvz drizzle-2009.07.1098.tar.gz \ cd drizzle-2009.07.1098 \ sudo apt-get build-dep libdrizzle0 \ sudo apt-get install gperf libprotobuf-dev protobuf-compiler uuid-dev

Re: Call for Testers: Karmic kernel with sound controller powerdown fixes

2009-07-27 Thread Daniel Chen
Hi Matthew, On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Matthew Garrettmj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote: I know that this is a very pedantic point, but when distributing kernel builds (or, indeed, any other GPLed code) it's helpful to include the source (or a pointer to the source) alongside it Right, an

Error in Launchpad for signing the Code of Conduct

2009-07-27 Thread David MENTRE
Hello, I'm trying to sign the Code of Conduct[1] (in order to use PPA). I have downloaded UbuntuCodeofConduct-1.0.1.txt and signed it. $ gpg --clearsign UbuntuCodeofConduct-1.0.1.txt The signature seems correct: $ LANG=C gpg --verify UbuntuCodeofConduct-1.0.1.txt.asc gpg: Signature made Mon

Re: Migrating OCaml to 3.11.1 in Karmic?

2009-07-27 Thread David MENTRE
Hello, David MENTRE dmen...@linux-france.org writes: Do following operations in 6 rounds. Start round /n/ once round /n+1/ is finished. In the following: * synchronize: synchronize source package from Debian unstable to Ubuntu karmic; * recompile: recompile the source package in Karmic;