Re: dip: unused group but still available.

2013-09-12 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:35:16PM +0200, Daniel Curtis wrote:
> It's very interesting, because on mentioned Wiki page we could
> read, that 'dip' group is unused in Ubuntu.
> 
> * dip: Unused in Ubuntu, should just go away completely.

Groups in the "global static" range (0-99) are permanently allocated and
can never be removed, although of course we can stop using them.

-- 
Colin Watson   [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


dip: unused group but still available.

2013-09-12 Thread Daniel Curtis
Hi

By reading Ubuntu Wiki[1] about Device Permissions we can
find something interesting in 'Implementation' subheading
and notes about various default groups. My question is about
a 'dip' group, which is available in e.g. Xubuntu 12.04 LTS.

It's very interesting, because on mentioned Wiki page we could
read, that 'dip' group is unused in Ubuntu.

* dip: Unused in Ubuntu, should just go away completely.

But this group is still in '/etc/group' file. Also default user is already
in 'dip' group. So what should I do? Remove, leave as is or delete
user from this group? Generally: why it's available when Wiki page
contains different information?

Best regards.
__
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/Intrepid/DevicePermissions
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: dip: unused group but still available.

2013-09-12 Thread Marc Deslauriers
On 13-09-12 10:35 AM, Daniel Curtis wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> By reading Ubuntu Wiki[1] about Device Permissions we can
> find something interesting in 'Implementation' subheading
> and notes about various default groups. My question is about
> a 'dip' group, which is available in e.g. Xubuntu 12.04 LTS.
> 
> It's very interesting, because on mentioned Wiki page we could
> read, that 'dip' group is unused in Ubuntu.
> 
> * dip: Unused in Ubuntu, should just go away completely.
> 

The 'dip' group is used to control access to pppd.


> But this group is still in '/etc/group' file. Also default user is already
> in 'dip' group. So what should I do? Remove, leave as is or delete
> user from this group? Generally: why it's available when Wiki page
> contains different information?

Why not just leave it as-is?

The wiki page you linked is about 'Intrepid', which is an old release, and not
the release you are currently using.

Marc.


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss