On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:52 PM, John Johansen
wrote:
> On 04/06/2016 02:32 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> On 6 April 2016 at 22:25, Xen wrote:
>>> Bryan Quigley schreef op 06-04-16 22:35:
Hi all,
The naming scheme of just
> I am not sure what problem you are trying to fix.
I want the version of Ubuntu to actually mean what version of
essential software I should expect.
I want "14.04.4 LTS" to mean the exact same thing on the download page
as it does in /etc/lsb-release.
> First of all point releases are only
On 04/06/2016 02:32 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 6 April 2016 at 22:25, Xen wrote:
>> Bryan Quigley schreef op 06-04-16 22:35:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The naming scheme of just "Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS" is no longer
>>> meaningful when it comes to determining what
On 6 April 2016 at 22:25, Xen wrote:
> Bryan Quigley schreef op 06-04-16 22:35:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The naming scheme of just "Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS" is no longer
>> meaningful when it comes to determining what kernel/mesa/xorg you are
>> on. It's also confusing to many users
On 6 April 2016 at 21:35, Bryan Quigley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The naming scheme of just "Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS" is no longer
> meaningful when it comes to determining what kernel/mesa/xorg you are
> on. It's also confusing to many users what 14.04.4 actually means
>
Bryan Quigley schreef op 06-04-16 22:35:
> Hi all,
>
> The naming scheme of just "Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS" is no longer
> meaningful when it comes to determining what kernel/mesa/xorg you are
> on. It's also confusing to many users what 14.04.4 actually means
> and it makes determining if you are
Hi all,
The naming scheme of just "Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS" is no longer
meaningful when it comes to determining what kernel/mesa/xorg you are
on. It's also confusing to many users what 14.04.4 actually means
and it makes determining if you are supported more difficult [1].
I propose for 16.04 we