Re: Suggestion: App names not fully visible in GUI
My suggestion is that app names should be fully visible and not truncated. Full Ack. I think there's also been one or two bugs about it. -- Chris On 2021/10/06 4:28, Henrik Rosenø wrote: Hi! This mailing list is supposed to be the place to post suggestions for enhancement of Ubuntu. I am talking about the Ubuntu 20.04 Desktop. My suggestion is that app names should be fully visible and not truncated. On the following screen shot you can see, that all LibreOffice apps are shown having the same name, so you have to guess what is what based on the icon. That is not very user friendly: Love, Henrik Rosenø -- Henrik Rosenø, M.Sc (civilingeniør) Website:www.Transformation.DK Spiritual, psychological, ethical, and political subjects. English: The path to eternal life is spiritual and sexual transformation.dk Dansk: Vejen til evigt liv er åndelig og seksuel transformation.dk -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Can someone please publish `gist` package fixes?
It looks like a fix to bug 1940907 was created on 17 September but hasn't yet reached the repositories so that `apt update; apt upgrade` gets the new changes on Ubuntu 20.04. Can someone please publish the changes to the proper repository? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gist/+bug/1940907 -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Building kernel metapackages
I have built a modified kernel following the BuildYourOwnKernel guide and would like to distribute it in a private apt repo. (I’m using Bionic now, but will move to Focal in the near future.) It works to ask apt to install one of my packages by its hyper-specific name, like, linux-image-unsigned-4.15.0-159-generic, but I’d like to also produce the linux-image-generic and linux-headers-generic metapackages. I can see that these are produced by the linux-meta project but I could not find any documentation on it. If that’s the right way to proceed, how can I use it to produce metapackages that reference the custom packages I built? Or is it easier to create my own metapackages from scratch? Thanks, Ryan -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
