Am 24.02.2010 15:59, schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
2010/2/24 Scott James Remnantsc...@ubuntu.com:
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 16:16 +0200, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
Any objections or observations for a MIR (main inclusion request) of
usb-modeswitch and inclusion on the default installation of Ubuntu
10.04
Hello Josua,
Josua Dietze [2010-09-02 19:22 +0200]:
In the meantime, things have happened.
Indeed! usb-modeswitch is in Maverick by default, replacing
modem-modeswitch. :-)
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian
Am 02.09.2010 19:28, schrieb Martin Pitt:
Hello Josua,
Josua Dietze [2010-09-02 19:22 +0200]:
In the meantime, things have happened.
Indeed! usb-modeswitch is in Maverick by default, replacing
modem-modeswitch. :-)
Oops! Sorry for the noise, should have checked ...
Thanks,
Josua
--
A little bit *bump* - so, what we do with this one? Is there enough
reason for freeze exception for this one?
Cheers,
Peter.
So far response from hotplug mailing list is been very positive so far[1]:
1) Some attention should be taken what is supported by kernel itself
and usb-modeswitch and
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 12:17 +0200, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
A little bit *bump* - so, what we do with this one? Is there enough
reason for freeze exception for this one?
A freeze exception wouldn't just be add usb-modeswitch, we also need
to remove modem-modeswitch from udev, make sure that
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:51 +0200, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
2010/3/1 Scott James Remnant sc...@ubuntu.com:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 12:17 +0200, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
A little bit *bump* - so, what we do with this one? Is there enough
reason for freeze exception for this one?
A
Hi Scott,
I agree with your proposal below. It's quite late in the release cycle
for such a major change with potential of breakage.
Thanks,
Marjo
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 13:49 +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 12:17 +0200, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
A little bit *bump*
If it wasn't after Feature Freeze already, I'd be quite supportive -
usb-modeswitch totally seems the way to go; I just think it's too late
to make the change for an LTS, and I certainly don't think it's a good
idea to introduce overlapping pieces this late.
It seems more prudent to me to
2010/2/25 Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com:
2010/2/25 Timo Jyrinki timo.jyri...@gmail.com:
2010/2/25 Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com:
By the way, reading all materials, I just thought - usb-modeswitch now
has nice udev wrapper - why not ship it by default? Why it isn't in
main? Is there
2010/2/25 Timo Jyrinki timo.jyri...@gmail.com:
2010/2/24 Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com:
I fully agree with you Scott, however I am not sure which one of us
should start discussion there. Would be nice for you Ubuntu guys to
start pushing this idea, because you have some backing.
Anyway,
2010/2/25 Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com:
By the way, reading all materials, I just thought - usb-modeswitch now
has nice udev wrapper - why not ship it by default? Why it isn't in
main? Is there any objections to this? Patents, legal issues (I can't
think of any, but still)?
I think this
2010/2/25 Timo Jyrinki timo.jyri...@gmail.com:
2010/2/25 Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com:
By the way, reading all materials, I just thought - usb-modeswitch now
has nice udev wrapper - why not ship it by default? Why it isn't in
main? Is there any objections to this? Patents, legal issues
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 16:16 +0200, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
Any objections or observations for a MIR (main inclusion request) of
usb-modeswitch and inclusion on the default installation of Ubuntu
10.04 LTS? Binary package size is 30kB + 10kB (data).
I have an objection on the basis that we
2010/2/24 Scott James Remnant sc...@ubuntu.com:
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 16:16 +0200, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
Any objections or observations for a MIR (main inclusion request) of
usb-modeswitch and inclusion on the default installation of Ubuntu
10.04 LTS? Binary package size is 30kB + 10kB (data).
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 16:59 +0200, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
I fully agree with you Scott, however I am not sure which one of us
should start discussion there. Would be nice for you Ubuntu guys to
start pushing this idea, because you have some backing.
I can't push something I know nothing
2010/2/24 Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com:
I fully agree with you Scott, however I am not sure which one of us
should start discussion there. Would be nice for you Ubuntu guys to
start pushing this idea, because you have some backing.
Anyway, I'm subscribing to that list and if no one will
2010/2/13 Timo Jyrinki timo.jyri...@gmail.com:
I think the main interesting thing would be that what are the
usb-modeswitch developers' motivations and could they with some help
from the kernel guys be directed to contribute more to the kernel.
In addition to previous concerns in this thread
2010/2/20 Timo Jyrinki timo.jyri...@gmail.com:
2010/2/13 Timo Jyrinki timo.jyri...@gmail.com:
I think the main interesting thing would be that what are the
usb-modeswitch developers' motivations and could they with some help
from the kernel guys be directed to contribute more to the kernel.
Peteris Krisjanis schrieb:
Conceptually udev modem-modeswitch is right way to go, but so far it
supports only one vendor and no one has explained how to extend it.
What would be the necessary conceptual changes in
*usb-modeswitch* to make it fit for an inclusion into udev?
Josua Dietze
--
Alan Pope schrieb:
Perhaps if some of the more irritating bugs in usb_modeswitch and
network_manager around 3g connections were fixed, yes. Some
specifics: ...
The bug you point to is related to a change in the SCSI/USB storage
code which exposed a quirk in Huawei devices. This caused a
2010/2/9 Timo Jyrinki timo.jyri...@gmail.com:
If I read those correctly, they work neither with or without
usb-modeswitch, hence adding it would not decrease any usability?
I poked around on IRC and summarized with my non-existent journalistic
skills the situation in my blog:
Hi,
a) Is anyone aware of some earlier discussions on the topic wrt Ubuntu
and b) Would everyone agree that it would make a lot of sense?
3G broadband usage is incredibly popular nowadays at least around
here, and usb-modeswitch is a must have for a majority (?) of new 3G
modems these days. It's
Hi Timo,
On 7 February 2010 14:16, Timo Jyrinki timo.jyri...@gmail.com wrote:
a) Is anyone aware of some earlier discussions on the topic wrt Ubuntu
and b) Would everyone agree that it would make a lot of sense?
Perhaps if some of the more irritating bugs in usb_modeswitch and
network_manager
23 matches
Mail list logo
