Re: LibreOffice bug - cannot run office because of 'missing file' in 5.1.4.2 28 June, 2017
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 08:17:00 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 12:49:06 -0700, paulwhee...@cox.net wrote: >>Frustrated, and falling behind in my work, because of your bug. > >No, because you are ignoring the messages you get by synaptic PS: If you would use an Ubuntu flavour, you could expect help by the Ubuntu users mailing list, https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users. "Users of Ubuntu and officially supported derivatives (Kubuntu, Edubuntu, Xubuntu, Lubuntu) can get support here. Users of derivatives (such as Backtrack and Linux Mint) are not officially supported." - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuUsersListFAQ#FAQ1 The list of Ubuntu flavours is outdated, anyway, Mint still isn't an Ubuntu flavour, https://www.ubuntu.com/download/ubuntu-flavours , https://www.ubuntu.com/about/about-ubuntu/flavours . Consider to migrate to an Ubuntu flavour or ask for help by Mint support. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: LibreOffice bug - cannot run office because of 'missing file' in 5.1.4.2 28 June, 2017
Hi, On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 12:49:06 -0700, paulwhee...@cox.net wrote: >Frustrated, and falling behind in my work, because of your bug. No, because you are ignoring the messages you get by synaptic, as well as sending tons of requests, instead of just one smart request and apart from this you are sending it to a mailing list of the wrong distro. It's all your fault. Take a look at http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html . On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 12:28:23 -0700, paulwhee...@cox.net wrote: >Also, if the program was installed by synaptic, and all entries >looked good during that installation, then how can there be a problem >resolving dependencies? This could happen if you are e.g. using official Ubuntu repositories with a third party repository, maybe a Mint repository. However, in your case it might be an user error, related to held packages, at least the messages complain about a possible hold package. On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 11:35:32 -0700, paulwhee...@cox.net wrote: >I would appreciate not getting any excuses for why your team is not >responsible for this package, because the attached photo says you are! >I doubt that hardware or OS has anything to do with this bug, > > >Bug Report: > >I created a new linuxmint installation. Mint isn't an Ubuntu flavour, IOW you sent your request to a mailing list of another distro. Regards, Ralf -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
LibreOffice bug - cannot run office because of 'missing file' in 5.1.4.2 28 June, 2017
LibreOffice bug - cannot run office because of 'missing file' in 5.1.4.228 June, 2017 You are getting this bug report, because you are listed as the 'maintainer' for this package. See: 'Maintainer of LibreOffice package.png' If you are not at fault, then send the information to libreoffice. I would appreciate not getting any excuses for why your team is not responsible for this package, because the attached photo says you are! I doubt that hardware or OS has anything to do with this bug, Bug Report: I created a new linuxmint installation. I reinstalled libreOffice (for 3rd time) after the removal problems listed in my prior emails. I tried clicking on a calc file I needed, and which I have opened dozens of times. Libreoffice barfed the same error message it had already complanied about. See: LibreOffice broken package - cannot load calc.png I then checked to see if the file was 'missing'. No, it is exactly where LO thinks it shoud be!! See: LibreOffice file is where it should be! See: LibreOffice file is where it should be.png REALLY? This sounds like a programming or compiler or packaging bug! Whatever it is, needs to be fixed, so I can do my work of entry billable hours. I have run linuxmint on this hardware for quite a while. Now your package cannot not include a needed library? How is this possible? That section has worked for years! Now what do I do, besides cry? Frustrated, and falling behind in my work, because of your bug. paul -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
