Re: Why is package libpam-smbpass removed?
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Linus Eklöfwrote: > > This breaks the easy set up for folder sharing in nautilus since only the > guest access will work unless setting up samba manually. > > Is this intended or should this feature be present and filed as a bug? It was removed upstream (pam_smbpass): https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-cvs/2015-October/111473.html -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Why is package libpam-smbpass removed?
If it is planned to have libpam-smbpass removed from 16.04, shouldn't there be a change in nautilus-share as well so only guest access authentication is possible? Right now it might be rather confusing to share a folder and it just won't work unless you configure samba manually, and if you are comfortable with that then maybe nautilus-share isn't even necessary. Cheers, Linus 2016-03-08 17:02 GMT+01:00 Nish Aravamudan: > On 08.03.2016 [14:12:46 +0100], Linus Eklöf wrote: > > This breaks the easy set up for folder sharing in nautilus since only the > > guest access will work unless setting up samba manually. > > > > Is this intended or should this feature be present and filed as a bug? > > Looking at the src:samba package: > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba, it's still published for > Xenial. > > Investigating the binary packages generated, though, you're right > libpam-smbpass is no longer generated. > > Ah, the changelog > (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+changelog) says: > > 2:4.1.20+dfsg-1ubuntu4 > Superseded in xenial-proposed on 2015-12-16 > samba (2:4.1.20+dfsg-1ubuntu4) xenial; urgency=medium > > * Backport Debian change to remove libpam-smbpasswd, it segfaults > leading to non working session (lp: #1515207) > > -- Sebastien Bacher <...> Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:47:44 +0100 > > That bug is: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1515207 and c#1 > there indicates Debian has also removed this package. > > -Nish > > > -- > Nishanth Aravamudan > Ubuntu Server > Canonical Ltd > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Why is package libpam-smbpass removed?
On 08.03.2016 [17:29:11 +0100], Linus Eklöf wrote: > If it is planned to have libpam-smbpass removed from 16.04, shouldn't there > be a change in nautilus-share as well so only guest access authentication > is possible? Possibly, I have no idea :) I was just trying to provide you an answer to your original question. > Right now it might be rather confusing to share a folder and it just won't > work unless you configure samba manually, and if you are comfortable with > that then maybe nautilus-share isn't even necessary. I think this would be worth a bug if there isn't already one filed about it. -Nish > 2016-03-08 17:02 GMT+01:00 Nish Aravamudan: > > > On 08.03.2016 [14:12:46 +0100], Linus Eklöf wrote: > > > This breaks the easy set up for folder sharing in nautilus since only the > > > guest access will work unless setting up samba manually. > > > > > > Is this intended or should this feature be present and filed as a bug? > > > > Looking at the src:samba package: > > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba, it's still published for > > Xenial. > > > > Investigating the binary packages generated, though, you're right > > libpam-smbpass is no longer generated. > > > > Ah, the changelog > > (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+changelog) says: > > > > 2:4.1.20+dfsg-1ubuntu4 > > Superseded in xenial-proposed on 2015-12-16 > > samba (2:4.1.20+dfsg-1ubuntu4) xenial; urgency=medium > > > > * Backport Debian change to remove libpam-smbpasswd, it segfaults > > leading to non working session (lp: #1515207) > > > > -- Sebastien Bacher <...> Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:47:44 +0100 > > > > That bug is: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1515207 and c#1 > > there indicates Debian has also removed this package. > > > > -Nish > > > > > > -- > > Nishanth Aravamudan > > Ubuntu Server > > Canonical Ltd > > -- Nishanth Aravamudan Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Re: Why is package libpam-smbpass removed?
On 08.03.2016 [14:12:46 +0100], Linus Eklöf wrote: > This breaks the easy set up for folder sharing in nautilus since only the > guest access will work unless setting up samba manually. > > Is this intended or should this feature be present and filed as a bug? Looking at the src:samba package: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba, it's still published for Xenial. Investigating the binary packages generated, though, you're right libpam-smbpass is no longer generated. Ah, the changelog (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+changelog) says: 2:4.1.20+dfsg-1ubuntu4 Superseded in xenial-proposed on 2015-12-16 samba (2:4.1.20+dfsg-1ubuntu4) xenial; urgency=medium * Backport Debian change to remove libpam-smbpasswd, it segfaults leading to non working session (lp: #1515207) -- Sebastien Bacher <...> Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:47:44 +0100 That bug is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1515207 and c#1 there indicates Debian has also removed this package. -Nish -- Nishanth Aravamudan Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Why is package libpam-smbpass removed?
This breaks the easy set up for folder sharing in nautilus since only the guest access will work unless setting up samba manually. Is this intended or should this feature be present and filed as a bug? Cheers, Linus -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss