Re: Why is package libpam-smbpass removed?

2016-03-09 Thread Tom H
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Linus Eklöf  wrote:
>
> This breaks the easy set up for folder sharing in nautilus since only the
> guest access will work unless setting up samba manually.
>
> Is this intended or should this feature be present and filed as a bug?

It was removed upstream (pam_smbpass):

https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-cvs/2015-October/111473.html

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Why is package libpam-smbpass removed?

2016-03-08 Thread Linus Eklöf
If it is planned to have libpam-smbpass removed from 16.04, shouldn't there
be a change in nautilus-share as well so only guest access authentication
is possible?
Right now it might be rather confusing to share a folder and it just won't
work unless you configure samba manually, and if you are comfortable with
that then maybe nautilus-share isn't even necessary.

Cheers,
Linus

2016-03-08 17:02 GMT+01:00 Nish Aravamudan :

> On 08.03.2016 [14:12:46 +0100], Linus Eklöf wrote:
> > This breaks the easy set up for folder sharing in nautilus since only the
> > guest access will work unless setting up samba manually.
> >
> > Is this intended or should this feature be present and filed as a bug?
>
> Looking at the src:samba package:
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba, it's still published for
> Xenial.
>
> Investigating the binary packages generated, though, you're right
> libpam-smbpass is no longer generated.
>
> Ah, the changelog
> (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+changelog) says:
>
> 2:4.1.20+dfsg-1ubuntu4
> Superseded in xenial-proposed on 2015-12-16
> samba (2:4.1.20+dfsg-1ubuntu4) xenial; urgency=medium
>
>   * Backport Debian change to remove libpam-smbpasswd, it segfaults
> leading to non working session (lp: #1515207)
>
>  -- Sebastien Bacher <...>  Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:47:44 +0100
>
> That bug is:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1515207 and c#1
> there indicates Debian has also removed this package.
>
> -Nish
>
>
> --
> Nishanth Aravamudan
> Ubuntu Server
> Canonical Ltd
>
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Why is package libpam-smbpass removed?

2016-03-08 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On 08.03.2016 [17:29:11 +0100], Linus Eklöf wrote:
> If it is planned to have libpam-smbpass removed from 16.04, shouldn't there
> be a change in nautilus-share as well so only guest access authentication
> is possible?

Possibly, I have no idea :) I was just trying to provide you an answer
to your original question.

> Right now it might be rather confusing to share a folder and it just won't
> work unless you configure samba manually, and if you are comfortable with
> that then maybe nautilus-share isn't even necessary.

I think this would be worth a bug if there isn't already one filed about
it.

-Nish

> 2016-03-08 17:02 GMT+01:00 Nish Aravamudan :
> 
> > On 08.03.2016 [14:12:46 +0100], Linus Eklöf wrote:
> > > This breaks the easy set up for folder sharing in nautilus since only the
> > > guest access will work unless setting up samba manually.
> > >
> > > Is this intended or should this feature be present and filed as a bug?
> >
> > Looking at the src:samba package:
> > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba, it's still published for
> > Xenial.
> >
> > Investigating the binary packages generated, though, you're right
> > libpam-smbpass is no longer generated.
> >
> > Ah, the changelog
> > (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+changelog) says:
> >
> > 2:4.1.20+dfsg-1ubuntu4
> > Superseded in xenial-proposed on 2015-12-16
> > samba (2:4.1.20+dfsg-1ubuntu4) xenial; urgency=medium
> >
> >   * Backport Debian change to remove libpam-smbpasswd, it segfaults
> > leading to non working session (lp: #1515207)
> >
> >  -- Sebastien Bacher <...>  Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:47:44 +0100
> >
> > That bug is:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1515207 and c#1
> > there indicates Debian has also removed this package.
> >
> > -Nish
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nishanth Aravamudan
> > Ubuntu Server
> > Canonical Ltd
> >

-- 
Nishanth Aravamudan
Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: Why is package libpam-smbpass removed?

2016-03-08 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On 08.03.2016 [14:12:46 +0100], Linus Eklöf wrote:
> This breaks the easy set up for folder sharing in nautilus since only the
> guest access will work unless setting up samba manually.
> 
> Is this intended or should this feature be present and filed as a bug?

Looking at the src:samba package:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba, it's still published for
Xenial.

Investigating the binary packages generated, though, you're right
libpam-smbpass is no longer generated.

Ah, the changelog
(https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+changelog) says:

2:4.1.20+dfsg-1ubuntu4
Superseded in xenial-proposed on 2015-12-16
samba (2:4.1.20+dfsg-1ubuntu4) xenial; urgency=medium

  * Backport Debian change to remove libpam-smbpasswd, it segfaults
leading to non working session (lp: #1515207)

 -- Sebastien Bacher <...>  Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:47:44 +0100

That bug is:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1515207 and c#1
there indicates Debian has also removed this package.

-Nish


-- 
Nishanth Aravamudan
Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Why is package libpam-smbpass removed?

2016-03-08 Thread Linus Eklöf
This breaks the easy set up for folder sharing in nautilus since only the
guest access will work unless setting up samba manually.

Is this intended or should this feature be present and filed as a bug?

Cheers,
Linus
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss