Hi,
I've noticed that Ubuntu's boot speed seems to have taken a fall in
Hardy. Anecdotally I believe that Gutsy was the fastest but from a
viewable stats perspective the fall can be seen in Feisty versus Hardy
on
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BootCharting#head-dca0372aa8fd490a9717ad0c72c9b400c236a581
.
On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 17:34 +0200, Markus Hitter wrote:
> Am 10.05.2008 um 11:58 schrieb Sitsofe Wheeler:
> > I've noticed that Ubuntu's boot speed seems to have taken a fall in
> > Hardy.
>
> How would one notice? Is Hardys hibernating/standby still so flaky
&
On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 09:48 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> Issues with slow-loading GNOME popped up in Gutsy. There's been a lot
> of discussion on that bug. It seems the gnome-panel just hangs for a
> while opening and closing something.
Do you have a link to the discussion? Were things supos
On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 12:53 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> It's curious Fedora 9 showed such poor results compared with Ubuntu (and
> compared with Fedora 8), given that they are listing fast Xorg boot as a
> feature. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OneSecondX
I wouldn't say it is surpri
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 03:37 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 08:28 +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> > Do you have a link to the discussion? Were things suposed to be any
> > better in Hardy?
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bu
(``-_-´´) -- Fernando wrote:
> Olá Mackenzie e a todos.
>
> On Wednesday 14 May 2008 05:14:51 Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
>> The results of using Bootchart to map the GNOME startup process, for the
>> many users that did it, consistently showed gnome-panel as the culprit.
>
> How does one use boot
This is a quick heads up about a w3m bug that was reported many years ago and
has not seen any responses. As w3m is installed by default and the bug has easy
steps to reproduce the problem I'm making a last ditch effort to raise the bugs
visibility:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/w3m/+b
Martin Olsson minimum.se> writes:
>
> For the first bug I recommend that you upstream it. There is not a lot
That's an extremely useful reply and is the sort of information I could have
done with a few years ago. I won't follow that suggestion at the moment though
as prior to my original post I
Hi,
Has there been a change to which preemption patches are included in the
default Ubuntu kernel used in Feisty? I ask because I seem to have
noticed far more stutters (both when sound is played and when moving
things like the mouse pointer in X) and periods of up to half a second
where interacti
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 04:28 -0500, Daniel T. Chen wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 08:37 +0000, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> > Has there been a change to which preemption patches are included in the
> > default Ubuntu kernel used in Feisty? I ask because I seem to have
> > noti
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 16:37 -0500, Daniel T. Chen wrote:
> Are all of your detected audio devices capable of hardware muxing?
Perhaps not the microphone but all output devices are, yes (just the one
SBLive sound card).
--
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu can have serious problem when installed on machines whose BIOSes
cannot read files past the 1023rd cylinder. This is a well known problem
and there have been a fair few reports of this problem listed on the
forums as well as within launchpad. One of the more recent version of
these reports w
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 00:27 -0500, Michael R. Head wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 16:09 +1100, David Dean wrote:
> > From memory the "old" way to deal with this was to create a tiny slice
> > at the start of the disk, and install boot there - whether the user
>
> This was the so called "/boot" par
Matt, your reply is the best so far - it has addressed every point.
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 15:08 -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Most GRUB failure modes only provide a numeric error code, and so it's
> difficult to determine the cause of the issue. You may see many similar
> reports, but it isn't n
Hello,
After reading yet another series of threads regarding the NVIDIA binary
drivers I would like to ask: "What the Ubuntu position is towards binary
driver bugs?". Does Ubuntu take a similar stance to Red Hat whereupon
the moment you taint your kernel your bug will be closed and you will be
dir
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 12:44 +0100, Michael wrote:
> Which prompts the question: why isn't ndiswrapper included in the Feisty CD?
Well it's not all that supportable (you are at the mercy of whoever
wrote the Windows driver) and doesn't it need the user the extract the
Windows driver before it can b
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 17:55 +0200, Daniele wrote:
> I had a problem with my cups daemon.
You might be better off posting your bug report on
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ ...
--
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify se
Hi,
The "SATA disk is in PATA mode with kernel 2.6.20-16-generic (piix
claiming SATA controller on ICH4/ICH5 Intel chipsets)" aka "the great
renaming"
(
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/117314
) has been around for a week and it appears that the patch that led
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 09:37 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 11:43 +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
>
> > Are people that relabeled their partitions with /dev/h??? syntax (rather
> > than UUIDs) going to get notice that things are going back the other
&
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 09:37 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> Could you point out where this was advocated as a fix? The only
> supported configuration for /etc/fstab is using UUID= and LABEL= for all
> devices.
OK, here's a bug where the reporter advocated a rename to /dev/h??? -
https://bugs.
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 01:49 -0400, Daniel T. Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 15:15 +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> > pulseaudio instead. As far as I can see, esd is still used in Feisty
> > and I wonder if someone still cares about it. Moreover pulseaudio
>
> esd will still be used i
I've just stumbled across this page
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_talk:Ubuntu_Logo.svg on Wikipedia
which is debating whether the Ubuntu SVG logo should be pulled. It would
be good if someone from Ubuntu could weigh in on this one.
Additionally I just made this SVG Brief Logo Guide detailing
Over in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/3222 there is
a bug concerning gvim and it's hidden by default menu icon. I feel this
change is unnecessary because gvim is not installed by default and so
long as its desktop item is only installed when gvim is there is no
harm. Additional
I've been sitting on some power results for a while because I haven't
had time to tidy them up but by posting them perhaps they will turn out
to be useful to someone. This email is quite long and the results are
somewhat raw and in no particular order. Rough conclusions are at the
end.
On Linux I
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 09:46 +0200, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
> I once reported a bug about this, but Justin Wray suggested that I
> discuss this on a mailing list, first.
Curious. I filed a bug about disabling periodic fscks (as most other
operating system like Windows 95 and above along with OSX
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 20:13 +0200, Thilo Six wrote:
> There are two parts of computer users.
> The first one do backups, and second ones never had a harddisc
> failure.
Here's a variation on your theme. There are three types of people in the
world:
Those who don't do backups.
Those who do backups.
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 11:11 +0100, Szilveszter Farkas wrote:
> I've just discovered an old blueprint on Launchpad[0] and the
> corresponding wiki page[1], that Ubuntu was planning to consolidate
I also filed a bug alluding to this a few years ago:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffi
Many bugs reported turn out to be "hit and run" reports where something
is filed and never followed up. As such it is good that bugs are
aggressively closed where possibly to prevent launchpad cluttering up.
Unfortunately there are scenarios where this becomes problematic.
These days I see people
28 matches
Mail list logo
