Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

On 02/14/2018 04:22 PM, Will Cooke wrote: > Dear all, > > We want to be able to focus our engineering efforts on the things that > matter most to our users, and in order to do that we need to get some > more data about sort of setups our users have and which software they > are running on it. >

Re: merge-o-matic: Filtering for status pages

Thanks Julian! This is great. :) -- David Britton -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Re: RFC: Ubuntu Seeded Snaps

IMHO, Snap Store is more like an app store (like Google Play Store), than a regular package repository (archive.ubuntu.com, a PPA or a third party repository). I think some ground rules and some policies are necessary, but we must avoid burocracy and give freedom to developer, so he/she can create

Re: RFC: Ubuntu Seeded Snaps

On 02/09/2018 11:48 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > For better or worse, the snap store doesn't have teams. Should this be > rephrased in terms of collaboration or something? Well, I'd rather we set the expectation that the snap store learn to use LP teams. Mark -- ubuntu-devel mailing list

Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

Hi Will, On 14 February 2018 at 15:22, Will Cooke wrote: > We want to be able to focus our engineering efforts on the things that > matter most to our users, and in order to do that we need to get some more > data about sort of setups our users have and which software

Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

This makes sense from Ubuntu's perspective, and it will certainly be interesting to see the resulting data. I have a few concerns, but nothing insurmountable: How will this affect downstreams? Downstreams/non-official-flavors may want to disable or remove any diagnostics. Keep them in mind when

Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

Hi, "Send diagnostics information to help improve Ubuntu" sounds like you're continuously reporting things, but your proposal looks more like a single "installation ping" or something. I guess the apport and popcon reports would be continuous though? If you do this you should really make sure

Re: autopkgtest-build-lxd failing with bionic

Hello Timo, Timo Aaltonen [2018-02-15 16:50 +0200]: > On 14.02.2018 22:03, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am on bionic and managed to build bionic container for testing using: > > > > $ autopkgtest-build-lxd ubuntu-daily:bionic/amd64 > > > > Note this uses Ubuntu Foundations

Re: autopkgtest-build-lxd failing with bionic

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 04:10:01PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hello Timo, > > Timo Aaltonen [2018-02-15 16:50 +0200]: > > On 14.02.2018 22:03, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am on bionic and managed to build bionic container for testing using: > > > > > > $

Re: autopkgtest-build-lxd failing with bionic

On 14.02.2018 22:03, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Hi, > > I am on bionic and managed to build bionic container for testing using: > > $ autopkgtest-build-lxd ubuntu-daily:bionic/amd64 > > Note this uses Ubuntu Foundations provided container as the base, > rather than the third-party image that

Re: autopkgtest-build-lxd failing with bionic

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 04:10:01PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hello Timo, > > Timo Aaltonen [2018-02-15 16:50 +0200]: > > On 14.02.2018 22:03, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am on bionic and managed to build bionic container for testing using: > > > > > > $

Re: autopkgtest-build-lxd failing with bionic

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 06:48:31PM +, Iain Lane wrote: > [ autopkgtest-devel, this is > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2018-February/040138.html > and thread FYI - Reply-To / Mail-Followup-To set to exclude > ubuntu-devel from this subthread so reviews go to the right

Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 4:16 AM, Ernst Sjöstrand wrote: > Hi, > > "Send diagnostics information to help improve Ubuntu" sounds like > you're continuously reporting things, but your proposal looks more > like a single "installation ping" or something. > I guess the apport and

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Artsy testing

There have been long-standing complaints about Linux systems in general becoming unresponsive when waiting on the hard drive for something. Pretty sure this can't be fixed at the distro level. On 2/14/2018 at 10:34 PM, "Helios Martinez Dominguez" wrote: >

Re: Ubuntu-devel-discuss Digest, Vol 135, Issue 13

I hope you reconsider, maybe you like me find irc not the best place to get or give support anymore. However that doesn't mean they're aren't other avenues. On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 7:00 AM, < ubuntu-devel-discuss-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com> wrote: > Send Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list

Re: autopkgtest-build-lxd failing with bionic

[ autopkgtest-devel, this is https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2018-February/040138.html and thread FYI - Reply-To / Mail-Followup-To set to exclude ubuntu-devel from this subthread so reviews go to the right place ] On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:28:05AM -0500, Stéphane Graber

Re: Installation help (libindicator7)

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:44:23AM -0500, Jerome Wiley Segovia wrote: > Hi, Hi Jerome! > > I'm having trouble installing *libindicator7*. > > I'm running Ubuntu 16.04 on my local development box and need to install > Chrome. However, I'm getting a message saying that I have an unmet >

Artsy testing

Greetings. After trying Artsy system, everything seems alright with the exception of long standing hard disk activity which drops responsive behavior when web browsing, even just closing the web browser, mouse and keyboard drop functionality for long standing terms while there should be no

Installation help (libindicator7)

Hi, I'm having trouble installing *libindicator7*. I'm running Ubuntu 16.04 on my local development box and need to install Chrome. However, I'm getting a message saying that I have an unmet dependency on libappindicator1, which in turn requires libindicator7. I found your page at