Re: [ubuntu/bionic-proposed] update-manager 1:18.04.11 (Accepted)

2018-04-16 Thread Iain Lane
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 09:21:19PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > What I feel like should happen is to automatically generate compulsory > metadata in appstream generator from task fields or something. That could be done, but not from Task fields in isolation IMO. For ubuntu-desktop we have m

Re: [ubuntu/bionic-proposed] update-manager 1:18.04.11 (Accepted)

2018-04-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 09:21:19PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > I am concerned about the model here by which individual packages need to add > > blobs of metadata on the filesystem to declare themselves "not for removal". > > This is completely disconnected from the existing logic for man

Re: [ubuntu/bionic-proposed] update-manager 1:18.04.11 (Accepted)

2018-04-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:17:16PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 02:53:13PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Brian Murray wrote: > > > Why is it necessary to modify individual packages so that GNOME > > > Software won't uninstall them? > > >

Re: [ubuntu/bionic-proposed] update-manager 1:18.04.11 (Accepted)

2018-04-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 02:53:13PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Brian Murray wrote: > > Why is it necessary to modify individual packages so that GNOME > > Software won't uninstall them? > > Is update-manager being a dependency of ubuntu-desktop not enough to > >

Re: [ubuntu/bionic-proposed] update-manager 1:18.04.11 (Accepted)

2018-04-13 Thread Brian Murray
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 02:53:13PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Brian Murray wrote: > > Why is it necessary to modify individual packages so that GNOME > > Software won't uninstall them? > > > > Is update-manager being a dependency of ubuntu-desktop not enough to >

Re: [ubuntu/bionic-proposed] update-manager 1:18.04.11 (Accepted)

2018-04-13 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Brian Murray wrote: > Why is it necessary to modify individual packages so that GNOME > Software won't uninstall them? > > Is update-manager being a dependency of ubuntu-desktop not enough to > prevent it from being uninstalled? Thank you for asking. GNOME Softwa

[ubuntu/bionic-proposed] update-manager 1:18.04.11 (Accepted)

2018-04-13 Thread Brian Murray
I saw this upload to bionic today and a similar one for a different package yesterday and had some questions about it. Why is it necessary to modify individual packages so that GNOME Software won't uninstall them? Is update-manager being a dependency of ubuntu-desktop not enough to prevent it fro