On 18 February 2011 17:27, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Martin Pool m...@canonical.com wrote:
On 18 February 2011 16:27, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
What about 3 - have no owner at all: there is a unique path for each
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Thursday, February 17, 2011 05:20:07 pm John Arbash Meinel wrote:
On 2/14/2011 11:34 PM, Martin Pool wrote:
We have a question in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516709 about
what the permissions on official
On Tuesday, February 15, 2011 12:34:28 am Martin Pool wrote:
We have a question in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516709 about
what the permissions on official package branches ought to be, and how
they should be explained to the user.
The basic thing is that Launchpad knows who is allowed
On 18 February 2011 12:07, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Tuesday, February 15, 2011 12:34:28 am Martin Pool wrote:
There are a few options here and we'd appreciate hearing from Ubuntu
people how they think it should work:
0- No change: the nominal owner keeps write access.
