[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-22 Thread James Hunt
Re #27, removing -nographic still causes the same lockup for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208455 Title: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-16 Thread James Hunt
Latest kernel panic (from 2nd-level guest) using following kernel versions: host: 3.11.0-1-generic (-2 causes problems for my graphics hardware atm) 1st-level guest: 3.11.0-2-generic 2nd-level guest: 3.11.0-2-generic ** Attachment added: kvm.log

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-16 Thread James Hunt
Latest kernel panic (from 2nd-level guest) using following kernel versions: host: 3.11.0-1-generic (-2 causes problems for my graphics hardware atm) 1st-level guest: 3.11.0-2-generic 2nd-level guest: 3.11.0-2-generic ** Attachment added: kvm.log

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-15 Thread James Hunt
Now that 3.11 is out of proposed, we're seeing a different kernel failure, starting with run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-update-grub 3.11.0-2-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.11.0-2-generic Generating grub.cfg ... Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.11.0-2-generic Found initrd image:

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-15 Thread James Hunt
The kernel BUG: above happens when running bin/prepare-testbed -r saucy -d i386 from lp:auto-package-testing in canonistack: the kvm instance spins at ~200% CPU again. I modified bin/prepare-testbed slightly to log the output of the vm and disable byoubu. See attached. ** Patch added:

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-15 Thread James Hunt
To recreate: 1) Follow instructions on internal wiki (page InformationInfrastructure/IS/CanonicalOpenstack) to create a keypair. 2) Create an guest instance: $ keyname=${USER}_lcy01 $ image=$(euca-describe-images|grep saucy|head -1|awk '{print $2}') $ euca-run-instances -k $keyname -t m1.medium

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-15 Thread James Hunt
Now that 3.11 is out of proposed, we're seeing a different kernel failure, starting with run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-update-grub 3.11.0-2-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.11.0-2-generic Generating grub.cfg ... Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.11.0-2-generic Found initrd image:

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-15 Thread James Hunt
The kernel BUG: above happens when running bin/prepare-testbed -r saucy -d i386 from lp:auto-package-testing in canonistack: the kvm instance spins at ~200% CPU again. I modified bin/prepare-testbed slightly to log the output of the vm and disable byoubu. See attached. ** Patch added:

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-15 Thread James Hunt
To recreate: 1) Follow instructions on internal wiki (page InformationInfrastructure/IS/CanonicalOpenstack) to create a keypair. 2) Create an guest instance: $ keyname=${USER}_lcy01 $ image=$(euca-describe-images|grep saucy|head -1|awk '{print $2}') $ euca-run-instances -k $keyname -t m1.medium

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-09 Thread James Hunt
I got the panic again last night. This was running a 3.11 kernel for the host, but of course the 1st and 2nd level guests were still running 3.10 as 3.11 is still in -proposed. So, although it's possible to get a test run with (3.11, 3.10, 3.10) I really need to try running with (3.11, 3.11, 3.11)

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-09 Thread James Hunt
I got the panic again last night. This was running a 3.11 kernel for the host, but of course the 1st and 2nd level guests were still running 3.10 as 3.11 is still in -proposed. So, although it's possible to get a test run with (3.11, 3.10, 3.10) I really need to try running with (3.11, 3.11, 3.11)

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-08 Thread James Hunt
Testing with linux-image-3.11.0-0-generic from -proposed with nested=Y in all 3 environments does appear to solve this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208455

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-08 Thread James Hunt
Testing with linux-image-3.11.0-0-generic from -proposed with nested=Y in all 3 environments does appear to solve this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208455 Title: general

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM

2013-08-07 Thread James Hunt
What we know so far: - the issue is not related to cloud-init. - the very high CPU load was atleast partly caused by byobu bug 1208853. To disable byobu... === modified file 'bin/prepare-testbed' --- bin/prepare-testbed 2013-08-06 08:05:16 + +++ bin/prepare-testbed 2013-08-06 14:01:42 +

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-07 Thread James Hunt
Fresh kernel panic from 2nd-level nested VM running with host, 1st level and 2nd level all running with nested=1. ** Attachment added: kvm.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1208455/+attachment/3763650/+files/kvm.log -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM

2013-08-07 Thread James Hunt
What we know so far: - the issue is not related to cloud-init. - the very high CPU load was atleast partly caused by byobu bug 1208853. To disable byobu... === modified file 'bin/prepare-testbed' --- bin/prepare-testbed 2013-08-06 08:05:16 + +++ bin/prepare-testbed 2013-08-06 14:01:42 +

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-07 Thread James Hunt
Fresh kernel panic from 2nd-level nested VM running with host, 1st level and 2nd level all running with nested=1. ** Attachment added: kvm.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1208455/+attachment/3763650/+files/kvm.log -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM

2013-08-06 Thread James Hunt
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208455 Title: general protection fault running apt-get inside

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM

2013-08-06 Thread James Hunt
High CPU may be cloud-init. Using todays server image, running 'prepare- testbed' spins the CPU at 200%. The end of the log shows: Aug 6 10:13:15 autopkgtest [CLOUDINIT] helpers.py[DEBUG]: Running config-package-update-upgrade-install using lock (FileLock using file

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM

2013-08-06 Thread James Hunt
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208455 Title: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM To

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM

2013-08-06 Thread James Hunt
High CPU may be cloud-init. Using todays server image, running 'prepare- testbed' spins the CPU at 200%. The end of the log shows: Aug 6 10:13:15 autopkgtest [CLOUDINIT] helpers.py[DEBUG]: Running config-package-update-upgrade-install using lock (FileLock using file

[Bug 1208853] [NEW] dozens of byobu-status processes running on ubuntu server

2013-08-06 Thread James Hunt
Public bug reported: Using recent server images (today, yesterday), byobu is spawning dozens of byobu-status instances. In an OpenStack environment, this caused the nested kvm instance to consume 200% CPU and makes the system almost unusable. Killing all byobu, byobu-status and tmux processes

[Bug 1208891] [NEW] lightdm locks all ttys in kvm

2013-08-06 Thread James Hunt
Public bug reported: Booting saucy under kvm and switching to tty1 results in the screen going black once lightdm starts and this seems to also stop the user switching vt's using ctrl-alt-fX. ** Affects: lightdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added:

[Bug 1208455] [NEW] general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM on OpenStack

2013-08-05 Thread James Hunt
Public bug reported: Attempting to run apt-get in a nested vm hosted in OpenStack results in a general protection fault in the kernel in the nested VM. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM on OpenStack

2013-08-05 Thread James Hunt
Attempting to repeat the dep8 test run in the same environment has so far resulted in the qemu-kvm binary consuming 200% CPU (recreated on multiple nodes). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM on OpenStack

2013-08-05 Thread James Hunt
I'm suspecting an issue with nested=1... the nested VM does eventually boot but it takes many minutes to do so. At this point, the cpu usage of qemu-kvm drops to reasonable values. But if you ssh into the vm, the usage jumps up to ~200% again. To recreate: $ sudo apt-get install -y genisoimage

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM on OpenStack

2013-08-05 Thread James Hunt
** Attachment added: Another general protection fault panic https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/1208455/+attachment/3761555/+files/kvm.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM on OpenStack

2013-08-05 Thread James Hunt
Kernel logs can be found on bug 1208509. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208455 Title: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM on OpenStack

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM

2013-08-05 Thread James Hunt
Note that #4 was taken from a local nested kvm environment (not OpenStack). ** Summary changed: - general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM on OpenStack + general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1207848] Re: Shutdown takes an unusual amount of time

2013-08-05 Thread James Hunt
Hi Jan, Thanks for reporting this issue. I think you are correct - nm looks like the culprit. Re-assigning... ** Package changed: upstart (Ubuntu) = network-manager (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1208455] [NEW] general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM on OpenStack

2013-08-05 Thread James Hunt
Public bug reported: Attempting to run apt-get in a nested vm hosted in OpenStack results in a general protection fault in the kernel in the nested VM. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM on OpenStack

2013-08-05 Thread James Hunt
Attempting to repeat the dep8 test run in the same environment has so far resulted in the qemu-kvm binary consuming 200% CPU (recreated on multiple nodes). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM on OpenStack

2013-08-05 Thread James Hunt
I'm suspecting an issue with nested=1... the nested VM does eventually boot but it takes many minutes to do so. At this point, the cpu usage of qemu-kvm drops to reasonable values. But if you ssh into the vm, the usage jumps up to ~200% again. To recreate: $ sudo apt-get install -y genisoimage

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM on OpenStack

2013-08-05 Thread James Hunt
** Attachment added: Another general protection fault panic https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/1208455/+attachment/3761555/+files/kvm.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM on OpenStack

2013-08-05 Thread James Hunt
Kernel logs can be found on bug 1208509. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208455 Title: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM on OpenStack To manage

[Bug 1208509] [NEW] general protection fault running nested qemu-kvm

2013-08-05 Thread James Hunt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1208455 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208455 Public bug reported: Fighting with apport (bug 1208508). The attachments should really be added to bug 1208455. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: linux-image-3.10.0-6-generic

[Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM

2013-08-05 Thread James Hunt
Note that #4 was taken from a local nested kvm environment (not OpenStack). ** Summary changed: - general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM on OpenStack + general protection fault running apt-get inside nested kvm VM -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1205443] Re: init crashed with SIGSEGV in conf_select_job()

2013-08-01 Thread James Hunt
** Information type changed from Private to Public ** Branch linked: lp:~jamesodhunt/upstart/quiesce-cleanup-fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1205443 Title: init crashed with

[Bug 1202287] Re: init crashed with SIGSEGV in nih_main_loop()

2013-08-01 Thread James Hunt
** Information type changed from Private to Public ** Branch linked: lp:~jamesodhunt/upstart/quiesce-cleanup-fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202287 Title: init crashed with

[Bug 1121874] Re: MySQL launch fails silently if 4MB of disk space is available

2013-08-01 Thread James Hunt
Untested, but looks reasonable. However, note that you can now use the Upstart apparmor profile rather than using the pre-start for that: apparmor load /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld pre-start script # ... end script -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1203754] Re: nvidia 304.88-0ubuntu6 breaks X: EVO Push buffer channel allocation failed

2013-07-30 Thread James Hunt
Version 304_304.88-0ubuntu6 seemed to have introduced the problem, but version 304.88-0ubuntu7 fixes the issue. ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-304 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 788519] Re: behaviour regression due to apt-listchanges

2013-07-30 Thread James Hunt
APT_LISTCHANGES_FRONTEND only works I'm guessing if apt-listchanges is installed. I have now removed this package, but the behaviour is still the same since apt now calls sensible-pager automatically. A work-around for this issue is to set PAGER=cat to make changelog viewing non-interactive

[Bug 1203754] Re: nvidia 304.88-0ubuntu6 breaks X: EVO Push buffer channel allocation failed

2013-07-24 Thread James Hunt
This looks like a recurrence of bug 525958 however, I have this issue on cold boot - no suspend/resume involved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203754 Title: nvidia 304.88-0ubuntu6

[Bug 1163103] Re: upstart file bridge: unable to write pid file

2013-07-24 Thread James Hunt
** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1163103 Title: upstart file bridge: unable to write pid file To manage

[Bug 1203323] Re: init: upstart-dbus-bridge main process terminated with status 1

2013-07-23 Thread James Hunt
@Sworddragon - Thanks for reporting. This is in fact an innocuous message: the upstart-dbus-bridge should not run at the system level. The next update will remove the .conf file to make this message go away. @r0tter77: this problem has nothing to do with the behaviour you describe. Please raise a

[Bug 1203323] Re: init: upstart-dbus-bridge main process terminated with status 1

2013-07-23 Thread James Hunt
xnox - could you take a look at establishing why upstart.maintscript isn't doing what it should? ** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dmitrijs Ledkovs (xnox) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1203660] [NEW] lightdm crashed with SIGSEGV in g_list_last()

2013-07-22 Thread James Hunt
Public bug reported: Latest update to lightdm broke boot for me as ligthdm crashes on startup. dmesg shows: [ 38.108529] lightdm[1621]: segfault at 3f7 ip b74ada42 sp bff82ccc error 4 in libglib-2.0.so.0.3703.0[b746b000+102000] [ 39.364988] init: lightdm main process (1621) killed by SEGV

[Bug 1203660] Re: lightdm crashed with SIGSEGV in g_list_last()

2013-07-22 Thread James Hunt
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203660 Title: lightdm crashed with SIGSEGV in g_list_last() To manage notifications

[Bug 1203744] [NEW] apport typo means disks not synced on upstart crashes

2013-07-22 Thread James Hunt
Public bug reported: Patch attached. NB: Also noticed that the bzr branch is showing as OUT-OF-DATE. ** Affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Committed ** Attachment added: apport-upstart-bug.diff

[Bug 1203660] Re: lightdm crashed with SIGSEGV in g_list_last()

2013-07-22 Thread James Hunt
Manually downloading the old revision and rebooting does resolve the problem for me: $ wget http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/lightdm/lightdm_1.7.4-0ubuntu1_i386.deb $ wget http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/lightdm/liblightdm-gobject-1-0_1.7.4-0ubuntu1_i386.deb $

[Bug 1203751] [NEW] ibm fan control broken and iwlwifi no longer accepts 11n_disable option

2013-07-22 Thread James Hunt
Public bug reported: The 3.10.0-4-generic update broke a few things for me: 1) IBM thinkpad acpi fan-control no longer works: $ sudo modprobe thinkpad_acpi fan_control=1 ERROR: could not insert 'thinkpad_acpi': Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg) $ dmesg|grep -i

[Bug 1203754] [NEW] nvidia 304.88-0ubuntu6 breaks X: EVO Push buffer channel allocation failed

2013-07-22 Thread James Hunt
Public bug reported: The latest nvidia update breaks X on my system: [ 108.858] (II) Open ACPI successful (/var/run/acpid.socket) [ 108.858] (II) APM registered successfully [ 108.870] (EE) NVIDIA(GPU-0): EVO Push buffer channel allocation failed [ 108.870] (EE) *** Aborting *** [

[Bug 1203751] Re: ibm fan control broken and iwlwifi no longer accepts 11n_disable option

2013-07-22 Thread James Hunt
Looks like this issue may in fact be bug 1203211. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203751 Title: ibm fan control broken and iwlwifi no longer accepts 11n_disable option To manage

[Bug 1203660] Re: lightdm crashed with SIGSEGV in g_list_last()

2013-07-22 Thread James Hunt
The default behaviour of the boot with this bug is that the greeter never appears; you just see the Ubuntu pulsing plymouth theme. However, the system has booted so you can switch to a text console (control+alt+f1 for example), login and take remedial action as shown in #6. -- You received this

[Bug 1202023] Re: Upstart ignores .override files that are symlinks

2013-07-19 Thread James Hunt
This is by design: - http://upstart.ubuntu.com/cookbook/#symbolic-links-don-t-work-in-etc-init - init(5) under RESTRICTIONS. ** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1201865] Re: upstart on nexus4 is frequently writing :sys:power_supply-device-changed event messages

2013-07-19 Thread James Hunt
** Also affects: upstart Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201865 Title: upstart on nexus4 is frequently writing :sys:power_supply-device-

[Bug 1201865] Re: upstart on nexus4 is frequently writing :sys:power_supply-device-changed event messages

2013-07-19 Thread James Hunt
This is rather an interesting one: we first added support for running upstart as a non-priv user, we forced it to run in debug mode (since debugging was the main reason for running init as a non-priv user). As such, when you run init --user, you are automatically in debug mode ('initctl

[Bug 1201865] Re: upstart on nexus4 is frequently writing :sys:power_supply-device-changed event messages

2013-07-19 Thread James Hunt
** Changed in: upstart Assignee: (unassigned) = James Hunt (jamesodhunt) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201865 Title: upstart on nexus4 is frequently writing :sys:power_supply

[Bug 1201865] Re: upstart on nexus4 is frequently writing :sys:power_supply-device-changed event messages

2013-07-19 Thread James Hunt
** Changed in: upstart Status: New = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201865 Title: upstart on nexus4 is frequently writing :sys:power_supply-device- changed

[Bug 1199778] Re: upstart crashes if re-exec'ed with active chroot sessions

2013-07-11 Thread James Hunt
Correction to the process above: a session only gets created when a job is queried so a maintainer script is probably invoking status/start/stop/restart. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1199778] Re: upstart crashes if re-exec'ed with active chroot sessions

2013-07-11 Thread James Hunt
** Branch linked: lp:~jamesodhunt/upstart/bug-1199778 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199778 Title: upstart crashes if re-exec'ed with active chroot sessions To manage notifications

[Bug 1199778] Re: upstart crashes if re-exec'ed with active chroot sessions

2013-07-11 Thread James Hunt
Failure message, for reference: conf.c:1510: Assertion failed in conf_source_deserialise_all: NIH_LIST_EMPTY (conf_sources) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199778 Title: upstart

Making Android system properties available to Upstart

2013-07-10 Thread James Hunt
of a better way to solve this problem, please jump in. Kind regards, James. -- James Hunt (*) - just like 'watchprop' does in the Android environment. #upstart on freenode http://upstart.ubuntu.com/cookbook https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/upstart

[Bug 1199778] [NEW] upstart crashes if re-exec'ed with active chroot sessions

2013-07-10 Thread James Hunt
Public bug reported: Problem affects both 1.9 and 1.9.1. ** Affects: upstart Importance: High Assignee: James Hunt (jamesodhunt) Status: New ** Affects: upstart (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: upstart Importance: Undecided = High

[Bug 1199778] Re: upstart crashes if re-exec'ed with active chroot sessions

2013-07-10 Thread James Hunt
** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199778 Title: upstart crashes if re-exec'ed with active chroot sessions To manage

[Bug 1199499] Re: upstart file bridge sets FILE to glob pattern instead of specific file

2013-07-10 Thread James Hunt
Hi Brian, If you use a glob pattern in FILE, the way to determine the name of the matching file in the job is via the MATCH variable: start on file FILE=/var/crash/*.crash EVENT=create exec echo matching file was $MATCH ** Changed in: upstart Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in:

[Bug 1199499] Re: upstart file bridge sets FILE to glob pattern instead of specific file

2013-07-10 Thread James Hunt
Forgot to mention that this is documented in file-event(7). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199499 Title: upstart file bridge sets FILE to glob pattern instead of specific file To

[Bug 1199778] Re: upstart crashes if re-exec'ed with active chroot sessions

2013-07-10 Thread James Hunt
This problem affects those systems hosting chroots but also affects those with sbuild/pbuilder installed. The failure process is as follows: - user builds a package in the sbuild/pbuilder env. - upstart gets updated within the sbuild/pbuilder chroot as part of the package build. - as part of the

[Bug 1188642] Re: Init aborts with the message: init: log.c:813: Assertion failed in log_clear_unflushed: ! log-io

2013-07-08 Thread James Hunt
** Changed in: upstart Status: In Progress = Fix Released ** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1188642 Title:

[Bug 1198649] Re: Update to 1.8-0ubuntu1.2 in raring causes system hang at configure

2013-07-08 Thread James Hunt
** Summary changed: - Update to 1.9.1 causes system hang at configure + Update to 1.8-0ubuntu1.2 in raring causes system hang at configure -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1198649

[Bug 1197529] Re: upstart in saucy needs a build-depends on automake = 1.12

2013-07-08 Thread James Hunt
** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = James Hunt (jamesodhunt) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1197529 Title: upstart in saucy needs a build-depends

[Bug 1197789] Re: Upstart upgrades are creating problematic processes

2013-07-08 Thread James Hunt
@Sworddragon - Thanks for reporting. Is this on a single system? Do you just have a single instance of the /proc/self/fd/9 process? Please can you run 'apport-collect 1197789' on an affected system and follow the prompts to help debug this. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1198180] Re: possible leak in upstart 1.5

2013-07-08 Thread James Hunt
Approximately how many running jobs do you have after you've created 40k containers? If you stop all those network interfaces, is the memory reclaimed? Please provide further details so we can investigate more fully. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1197225] Re: upstart-file-bridge assert failure: string.c:396: Assertion failed in nih_str_split: str != NULL

2013-07-05 Thread James Hunt
** Changed in: upstart Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1197225 Title: upstart-file-bridge assert failure: string.c:396: Assertion failed in

[Bug 1197225] Re: upstart-file-bridge assert failure: string.c:396: Assertion failed in nih_str_split: str != NULL

2013-07-03 Thread James Hunt
** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = James Hunt (jamesodhunt) ** Information type changed from Private to Public ** Also affects: upstart Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: upstart Assignee: (unassigned) = James Hunt (jamesodhunt

[Bug 1197225] Re: upstart-file-bridge assert failure: string.c:396: Assertion failed in nih_str_split: str != NULL

2013-07-03 Thread James Hunt
** Changed in: upstart Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1197225 Title: upstart-file-bridge assert failure: string.c:396: Assertion failed in

[Bug 1197426] [NEW] starpar-upstart-inject causes upstart to consume a lot of cpu

2013-07-03 Thread James Hunt
Public bug reported: My machine was responding sluggishly. Top showed PID 1 consuming almost 70% CPU. The culprit seems to be the startpar-bridge job which had 2 running instances: $ sudo initctl list|grep startpar

[Bug 1197426] Re: starpar-upstart-inject causes upstart to consume a lot of cpu

2013-07-03 Thread James Hunt
get_started is a job that also specifes 'start on started', so upstart was chasing both jobs constantly: only 1 job can reasonably specify such an unspecific start condition. ** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1195687] Re: Init crashes with kernel 3.10.0

2013-07-01 Thread James Hunt
Does your system fail to boot or is it that you are simply unable to login? If it is failing to boot, please remove 'quiet' and 'splash' from your kernel command-line and either attach a log of the console output, or just attach a picture showing crash details. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1195687] Re: Init crashes with kernel 3.10.0 when using radeon.audio=1

2013-07-01 Thread James Hunt
14:41 Trevinho jodh: unfortunately I'm getting a black screen... 14:41 Trevinho jodh: also removing splash and quiet I'm getting a fast log, then the screen gets blank 14:43 Trevinho (and nothing in /var/crash this time) 14:55 Trevinho jodh: I'm using the custom cmd line for

[Bug 1188642] Re: Init aborts with the message: init: log.c:813: Assertion failed in log_clear_unflushed: ! log-io

2013-06-26 Thread James Hunt
@regmka: Thanks very much for both reporting this issue and identifying the issue! :-) ** Changed in: upstart Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: upstart Assignee: (unassigned) = James Hunt (jamesodhunt) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1190526] Re: init crashed with SIGABRT in nih_discard()

2013-06-25 Thread James Hunt
** Changed in: upstart Status: New = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1190526 Title: init crashed with SIGABRT in nih_discard() To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1064357] Re: apport crashed with : struct.error: unpack requires a bytes object of length 4 in problem_report.py, line 75, in write

2013-06-24 Thread James Hunt
Just got this error when manually running apport-bug on 2 crash files generated in a raring - saucy dist upgrade confirming #6. No apport backtrace but apport shows the following in the terminal: ERROR: error('unpack requires a bytes object of length 4',) (apport-gtk:3903): Gtk-CRITICAL **:

[Bug 1190526] Re: init crashed with SIGABRT in nih_discard()

2013-06-20 Thread James Hunt
** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = James Hunt (jamesodhunt) ** Also affects: upstart Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: upstart Assignee: (unassigned) = James Hunt (jamesodhunt) -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1185560] Re: Console - Upstart bridge shows very confusing and unhelpful Starting and Stopping with no descriptions

2013-05-30 Thread James Hunt
Hi Clint - thanks for reporting. This is an issue with the plymouth- upstart-bridge which is part of the plymouth package. ** Package changed: upstart (Ubuntu) = plymouth (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1180270] [NEW] system became unresponsive. dmesg showed BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference

2013-05-15 Thread James Hunt
Public bug reported: Happened soon after a cold boot. I wonder if there is a way to detect these sorts of bugs from userland (some sort of dmesg/syslog sniffer) and prompt the user to reboot. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: linux-image-3.8.0-19-generic 3.8.0-19.30

[Bug 1180270] Re: system became unresponsive. dmesg showed BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference

2013-05-15 Thread James Hunt
Relevant chunk of dmesg attached. ** Attachment added: dmesg-bug.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1180270/+attachment/3677120/+files/dmesg-bug.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Patch Pilot report 2013-05-13

2013-05-13 Thread James Hunt
the momentum going so we can turn [2] into a wall of green^H^H^H^H^H err blue sky and sunshine! :-) Kind regards, James. -- James Hunt #upstart on freenode http://upstart.ubuntu.com/cookbook https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/upstart-devel -- ubuntu-devel

Re: DEP-8 tests

2013-05-13 Thread James Hunt
On 13/05/13 13:59, Benjamin Drung wrote: Am Montag, den 13.05.2013, 13:36 +0100 schrieb James Hunt: Great to see all these new DEP-8 tests [1] appearing! Let's keep the momentum going so we can turn [2] into a wall of green^H^H^H^H^H err blue sky and sunshine! :-) I found a bug: [1] and [2

[Bug 1121874] Re: MySQL launch fails silently if 4MB of disk space is available

2013-05-13 Thread James Hunt
Thanks Adam, however these diffs are making use of LSB functions (from /lib/lsb/init-functions), but that script is not being sourced. Using echo directly to stderr should be sufficient in this context (or maybe defining a log_failure_msg() function locally to do that). -- You received this bug

[Bug 1178370] [NEW] text in qtcreator tutorials does not flow around images - images float over the text

2013-05-09 Thread James Hunt
Public bug reported: To recreate: 1) Select Welcome tab in QtCreator. 2) Select the Tutorials tab. 3) Select any non-video tutorial. 4) Observe how images are overlayed on the text, making the text mostly illegible. Expected outcome: text flows around images. Actual outcome: image float over

[Bug 1174272] Re: 'reboot now' reverting to maintenance mode

2013-05-07 Thread James Hunt
shutdown now is supposed to switch to single-user mode (see bug 1065851). reboot now is invalid - the shutdown command takes a time parameter (such as now), but the reboot command does not (see the man page). By specifying reboot now you are asking the system to reboot by running the now

[Bug 1065851] Re: shutdown now command does not work

2013-05-07 Thread James Hunt
This is correct behaviour - shutdown now is supposed to switch to single-user mode unless an explicit option has been set to specify an alternative form of shutdown. What you probably meant to type was shutdown -h now which will halt the system (and generally power it off too). The man page for

[Bug 1065851] Re: shutdown now command does not work

2013-05-07 Thread James Hunt
shutdown man page updated upstream to clarify behaviour. ** Also affects: upstart Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: upstart Assignee: (unassigned) = James Hunt (jamesodhunt) ** Changed in: upstart Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: upstart Status

[Bug 1124384] Re: Configuration reload clears event that others jobs may be waiting on

2013-04-26 Thread James Hunt
at the sprint next week. ** Patch added: upstart-bug-1124384-minimal-fix.diff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1124384/+attachment/3654975/+files/upstart-bug-1124384-minimal-fix.diff ** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = James Hunt (jamesodhunt

[Bug 1103406] Re: kernel disabled console output and keyboard lights in early boot

2013-04-26 Thread James Hunt
Sorry - haven't been able to test all these kernels yet so will report back when I've had a chance. However, what I have discovered is that the bug has something to do with the quiet and/or splash kernel options: I remove these so my init menu works correctly. However, I've reverted back to stock

[Bug 1124384] Re: Configuration reload clears event that others jobs may be waiting on

2013-04-26 Thread James Hunt
at the sprint next week. ** Patch added: upstart-bug-1124384-minimal-fix.diff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1124384/+attachment/3654975/+files/upstart-bug-1124384-minimal-fix.diff ** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = James Hunt (jamesodhunt

[Bug 1172322] Re: kernel panic on boot

2013-04-24 Thread James Hunt
fwiw, just before the failed boot, the machine had forcibly shut itself down as a result of the bug 751689. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1172322 Title: kernel panic on boot To

[Bug 1172322] Re: kernel panic on boot

2013-04-24 Thread James Hunt
Subsequent boot worked correctly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1172322 Title: kernel panic on boot To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1172322] Re: kernel panic on boot

2013-04-24 Thread James Hunt
** Attachment added: IMG_0586.JPG https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1172322/+attachment/3652371/+files/IMG_0586.JPG -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1172322 Title:

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >