But,learning curve(if it is little bit steep),comes for a price.When you are
getting the GNU/Linux community editions for FREE ,it is upto the
learner,that he/she should try to adapt to the OS and its application as
much as possible.Being an end user,I am not desiring or thinking that
everybody
24 hours with Ubuntu
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2009/10/24_hours_with_ubuntu.html
A really crappy review of Ubuntu by a BBC reporter, who used it for 24
hours and says its not good enough.
Some of the feeback is interesting too - how the mincedows people feel
threatened and find the
On 26-Oct-2009, at 6:47 AM, Ramnarayan.K wrote:
24 hours with Ubuntu
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/
2009/10/24_hours_with_ubuntu.html
A really crappy review of Ubuntu by a BBC reporter, who used it for 24
hours and says its not good enough.
I actually find the review quite fair.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Ramnarayan.K ramnaraya...@gmail.comwrote:
24 hours with Ubuntu
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2009/10/24_hours_with_ubuntu.html
A really crappy review of Ubuntu by a BBC reporter, who used it for 24
hours and says its not good enough.
Some of the
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Sameep sam...@tuxwire.com wrote:
On 26-Oct-2009, at 6:47 AM, Ramnarayan.K wrote:
24 hours with Ubuntu
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2009/10/24_hours_with_ubuntu.html
A really crappy review of Ubuntu by a BBC reporter, who used it for 24
hours and
On 10/26/09, Sameep sam...@tuxwire.com wrote:
I actually find the review quite fair. I'm sure that the issues faced by the
blogger are in fact faced by several users.
I agree with the fact that there are problems, but that he should take
24 hours to dismiss the OS is what is galling.
There
Ramnarayan.K wrote:
24 hours with Ubuntu
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2009/10/24_hours_with_ubuntu.html
A really crappy review of Ubuntu by a BBC reporter, who used it for 24
hours and says its not good enough.
Why do you think its crappy review? He frankly pointed out what worked
