Subject: New: phatch 0.1-0ubuntu1 (source)
Date: Wednesday 13 February 2008 22:36
From: Ubuntu Installer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED], Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NEW: phatch_0.1.orig.tar.gz
NEW: phatch_0.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
NEW: phatch_0.1-0ubuntu1.dsc
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Luis de Bethencourt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can somebody please help me with the blender merge?
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blender/+bug/191130
I have compiling errors when doing pbuilder build, in some
src/blender/python stuff. I would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ho installato questa nuova versione di Avant Window Navigator, che da
poco รจ presente nei repo di ubuntu quindi senza dover aggiungere repo di
terzi, ma mancano totalmente le applets.
credo manchi il corrispondente pacchetto, che nelle altre versioni
Hi,
quick reminder: the MOTU meeting takes place at 4.00 UTC on Feb 15th in
#ubuntu-meeting.
If you're interested in ubuntu universe development, please join us at the
meeting.
P.S.: Now would be a good time, to add your points to the agenda at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Meetings.
Hi Scott,
Scott Kitterman wrote:
We no longer have upstream version freeze, we have feature freeze, so I
wonder
about upstream releases that just have bug fixes. IIRC when the new freeze
structure was created there was some discussion about this.
Speaking for myself (not as part of
Subject: New: php-xdebug 2.0.2-0ubuntu1 (source)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:15:11 -
From: Ubuntu Installer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Ubuntu Installer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephan Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NEW: php-xdebug_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz
NEW: php-xdebug_2.0.2-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
NEW:
Scott Kitterman proposed:
Up through Alpha 6, if a MOTU believes upload of a new upstream release that
just has bug fixes in it is warranted, they may upload it. File a bug in LP
with the upstream change log entries in it and mark it fix released when the
upload is done to document that
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2008 18:05 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
We no longer have upstream version freeze, we have feature freeze, so I
wonder about upstream releases that just have bug fixes. IIRC when the new
freeze structure was created there was some discussion about this.
Speaking
Stephan Hermann wrote:
That's how I see it, too. If a new upstream fixes serious bugs, we
should bring it in...(not forgetting the paperwork and an ack from
motu-release)
I think you misread his proposal. There's no need for an ACK from motu-release
if the new release is bug-fix only. That's
On Thursday 14 February 2008 15:43, Michael Bienia wrote:
On 2008-02-14 12:05:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Up through Alpha 6, if a MOTU believes upload of a new upstream release
that just has bug fixes in it is warranted, they may upload it. File a
bug in LP with the upstream change
On 2008-02-14 12:05:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Up through Alpha 6, if a MOTU believes upload of a new upstream release that
just has bug fixes in it is warranted, they may upload it. File a bug in LP
with the upstream change log entries in it and mark it fix released when the
upload
On 2008-02-14 22:11:29 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Another option I'm thinking which would be in the middle of having to do some
paperwork when it shouldn't be necessary and not thinking about it or not
checking it is to listen all the changes from upstream NEWS or ChangeLog (if
the
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2008 15:43, Michael Bienia wrote:
On 2008-02-14 12:05:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Up through Alpha 6, if a MOTU believes upload of a new upstream release
that just has bug fixes in it is warranted, they may upload it. File a
bug in LP with
Michael Bienia wrote:
On 2008-02-14 22:11:29 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Another option I'm thinking which would be in the middle of having to do some
paperwork when it shouldn't be necessary and not thinking about it or not
checking it is to listen all the changes from upstream NEWS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:05:18AM EST, Scott Kitterman wrote:
We no longer have upstream version freeze, we have feature freeze, so I
wonder
about upstream releases that just have bug fixes. IIRC when the new freeze
structure was created
Hi,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Stephan Hermann wrote:
That's how I see it, too. If a new upstream fixes serious bugs, we
should bring it in...(not forgetting the paperwork and an ack from
motu-release)
I think you misread his proposal. There's no need for an ACK from motu-release
if
Stephan Hermann wrote:
Hi,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Stephan Hermann wrote:
That's how I see it, too. If a new upstream fixes serious bugs, we
should bring it in...(not forgetting the paperwork and an ack from
motu-release)
I think you misread his proposal. There's no need for an ACK
Good Morning,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Stephan Hermann wrote:
Hi,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Stephan Hermann wrote:
That's how I see it, too. If a new upstream fixes serious bugs, we
should bring it in...(not forgetting the paperwork and an ack from
motu-release)
I think you
18 matches
Mail list logo
