On 2011-02-27 17:31:03 +0100, Horvath Andras wrote:
Hello Andras,
Please include the latest version of my aaphoto package from Debian
(0.41) into the upcoming Natty (0.40 currently).
http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/natty/aaphoto
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/aaphoto
This is a
On 2010-10-20 11:16:29 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
when I tested out the package on my updated pbuilder it built fine
[relevant part of the log attached] but it failed on the buildd
The check that made the build fail is done by the package
pkgbinarymangler which is installed on the buildds.
On 2010-09-20 21:46:38 -0400, Kevin McKinney wrote:
checking what language compliance flags to pass to the C compiler...
checking for GNOME_DEVICE_MANAGER... configure: error: Package
requirements (libgnome-2.0 = 2.14.0
libgnomeui-2.0 = 2.14.0
gtk+-2.0 = 2.6.0
hal = 0.5.10) were not
On 2010-06-18 09:07:36 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I looked it up and it was
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ChristianMangold/MOTUDeveloperApplication
http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/04/27/%23ubuntu-meeting.html
Specifically, he was told by a DMB member that MOTU is for generalists and he
On 2010-06-18 13:00:17 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Kubuntu-dev only covers main.
That explains my mistake. So the kubuntu package set only covers the KDE
subset from main and allows Kubuntu developers to upload those without
being a core-dev. Any KDE packages that are in universe aren't part
On 2010-06-17 08:17:04 -0400, Ralph Janke wrote:
On 06/16/2010 02:52 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
This is not isolated to people working on KDE stuff. With the advent of
more and more package sets, people are more likely to get granted upload
privs to those rather than getting full MOTU or
On 2010-06-17 15:28:26 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
This is pretty close to the UDS discussion. A number of Kubuntu people
wanted a separate package set because, specifically, of people who
focused on these packages getting deferred from MOTU because the had
worked too much on KDE stuff.
Do
On 2010-06-17 16:58:12 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Michael Bienia mich...@bienia.de wrote:
On 2010-06-17 15:28:26 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
This is pretty close to the UDS discussion. A number of Kubuntu people
wanted a separate package set because, specifically, of people who
On 2010-03-02 12:55:00 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
Michael Bienia wrote:
On 2010-02-22 12:53:09 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
[MOTU Leaders]
My main rationale for retaining it was in hopes that new folk
would step forward to lead various aspects of what we do and help
shape best practices
On 2010-03-02 16:27:36 +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 00:06:49 Michael Bienia wrote:
ii) Coordinate with all the other Ubuntu Developer Teams to set up a
distribution-wide REVU Coordination team, with representatatives from
each development group helping
On 2010-03-03 02:08:27 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
Michael Bienia wrote:
On 2010-03-02 12:55:00 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
Michael Bienia wrote:
On 2010-02-22 12:53:09 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
[MOTU Leaders]
I fully understand that but do you have an idea how to keep this list
On 2010-02-22 12:53:09 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
A) Leadership
We have historically been broadly without hierarchy, nominating
and recognising some of our number as leaders (5) as a result of their
continuing efforts in some area that directly improves the health of
the team. On quick
Hello,
the regular second MC meeting won't happen this month as it falls on
December 24th (and we have *very* strong doubts to reach quorum on that
day :).
The dates for the next MC meetings are:
- Fri, December 11th 2009 7 UTC
- Fri, January 8th 2010 7 UTC
(after that following the regular
On 2009-12-07 13:53:59 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
First, thanks for providing this list.
# packages that were part of Debian at some point:
mirrordir
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mirrordir/+bug/484738
Michael
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
On 2009-11-30 00:44:45 +0100, Tim Michelsen wrote:
Therefore, I pu the minimum python version in my control file:
XS-Python-Version: =2.5
I am on Ubuntu Karmic.
When installing the package generated with
dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc
the system also installes the modules files for Python 2.5
On 2009-11-30 23:10:43 +0100, Tim Michelsen wrote:
What do I need to change in my control file in order to get only the
Python 2.6 files installed on systems where 2.6 is the default Python
version?
Does it make the package that bigger that you don't want it? Do you have
a reason for
On 2009-11-08 11:52:29 -0500, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
I concur in removing mirrordir from the Ubuntu and Debian
repositories.
Filed in Launchpad as bug #484738 (http://launchpad.net/bugs/484738)
Michael
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe
On 2009-10-28 10:50:24 -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
Is there a way we could speed up SRUs for the next week? As I
understand it the current process requires uploading the package to
Lucid before backporting the fix.
Does this mean updates are going to be impossible until Lucid is
available?
On 2009-10-16 10:37:10 -0400, Steven Harms wrote:
Do not turn this into a debate about the merits of qmail, that is
off-topic. You can see the debian report on inclusion here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510415
And here is the ITP bug for qmail:
On 2009-09-20 08:36:11 +1000, William Grant wrote:
It also appears that we now have three wishes for Launchpad Bugs. I've
been asked to give both on Wednesday, so get any opinions in soon!
- Better support to see which Ubuntu releases are affected by a bug
(version support)
Currently it's
On 2009-07-29 09:09:20 +1000, Luke Yelavich wrote:
Once the powerpc has cleared its build queue, I am happy to go through
the powerpc FTBF list, and work out why packages didn't build, and try
and get them buildable again. Note that main will largely be ok in
this regard, but universe may need
On 2009-06-04 13:34:45 -0400, Jacob Peddicord wrote:
I've been trying to figure this out for the past couple of days, but
no matter what I use to build hardinfo 0.5c-1 (sync), it builds
successfully on my pbuilder instance (yay). However, I'm getting
failed build messages from Launchpad.
You
On 2009-05-10 20:10:26 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
then wait for (or ping) the archive admins. They should automatically
detect that gtkpod-aac is obsolete and remove it from the archive.
If there is an automatic process for it then it doesn't work
successfully always as I filed several
On 2009-03-01 12:03:17 +0100, Ouattara Oumar Aziz (alias wattazoum) wrote:
Hi,
python-sqlite package is broken on Jaunty:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
python-sqlite: Depends: python ( 2.6) but 2.6.1-0ubuntu1 is to be
installed
E: Broken packages
Is there a bug to
Hi,
as I didn't see any offical announcement about it yet:
The voting for the new MC members is open and ends 2009-03-12.
https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/+polls
We have three nominees for three vacant places as the TB decided to
increase the MC to seven seats [0].
The nominees have also
On 2009-02-27 15:01:48 +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote:
Am Friday 27 February 2009 14:10:40 schrieb Michael Bienia:
Hi,
as I didn't see any offical announcement about it yet:
The voting for the new MC members is open and ends 2009-03-12.
https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/+polls
On 2009-02-21 20:52:47 +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
Oh, I didn't make it quite clear: I imagine that packages uploaded to
the PPA would be the ones that passed reviewing with 2 advocates. So
essentially, these package would be in a state ready for upload to
Ubuntu's archive. I agree
On 2009-02-11 18:59:32 -0600, David Mashburn wrote:
Dear WxWindows maintainer(s),
What is the simplest way to get a compiled version of wxPython to run on
the latest Ubuntu for testing? I am working on a modification of
PyCrust and wanted to test some changes in the wxStyledTextControl
On 2008-12-17 09:02:31 +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
Here's an example .muttrc file similar to what I use:
http://bryceharrington.org/files/lp-mutt-colors
When using mutt's threaded view, you can quickly spot patterns, like a
series of emails ending in one green one usually means
On 2008-11-05 16:30:19 -0800, Jordan Mantha wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Siegfried-Angel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jordan: The intention of this is not to let the list look better, but
to don't waste time reviewing the packages of those people who we have
already lost and who may
Hello,
I just want to announce that Michael Casadevall (NCommander) is now a
MOTU. The most of you will probably know him already, so an introduction
won't be necessary :)
Please give him a big welcoming hug!
Regards,
Michael
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify
On 2008-10-16 09:06:29 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Dear MOTU Council,
please consider appoint Devid Antonio Filoni (d.filoni on LP) and
Nicolas Valcarcel (nvalcarcel on LP) as new motu-sru members.
Devid's application and advocates:
On 2008-09-04 01:36:51 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
Understood. When the remaining members return from vacation,
could a proposed charter be prepared and presented at the following
MOTU Meeting? Given the new decision process, it may be appropriate
to send it with enough advance time that
On 2008-08-19 20:51:20 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Michael Bienia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This leads me to the question: what the main point on becoming a MOTU?
- is it the next reward for Ubuntu members who work hard on improving
Ubuntu (development)? They have good technicals
On 2008-08-06 17:19:55 -0700, Emil Ong wrote:
Hi,
There are a couple of hitches, though. We dual-license Resin as GPL
and a closed source professional (upsell) version with a bit of extra
code for added performance/clustering. We'd like to distribute the
latter in the non-free repository
[ moving that part of the discussion to ubuntu-motu ]
On 2008-07-09 14:16:33 +0200, Stephan Hermann wrote:
And with the Ubuntu Environment in general, giving out upload rights to
known contributors, we are showing to us and them that we trust those
people. I wonder if we still have this you
On 2008-07-03 19:24:57 +1200, Kai-Cheung Leung wrote:
Hello,
When I plan to upload my fixed packages (from the original sw-linux
deb-based distribution that already has a .tar.gz file and a .dsc file but
not .diff file),
That usually happens when the .tar.gz is not correctly named, so
On 2008-06-01 04:44:55 +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
looks, like we need two members (follow-ups to [1]), but that might be
subject
to discussion.
As I had to go out and look after one ~motu-sru member to get my SRUs
ACKed, I'd like to hear from the remaining ~motu-sru members how many
new
On 2008-05-31 01:14:16 +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
as overheard on #ubuntu-devel today, please don't use one bug with many
different tasks for transitions. The problem with this is, that any
subscriber of an affected package will get every mail for a change in that
bug (in short: [he/she'll
On 2008-05-31 22:22:18 +0200, Adna rim wrote:
I'm very interested in this topic and the one who started the
bug-report :) My ideas for this situation would be the following:
1.) mplayer without mencoder goes to universe and mencoder alone stays
in multiverse (there is already a mencoder
On 2008-05-25 13:07:44 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Stefan Potyra wrote:
- motu-council*
...
[*]: There already is a policy. What is good, what is bad about it?
Where? Couldn't find anything in the wiki.
I guess that would be
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CommunityCouncil/Delegation
On 2008-04-29 22:47:53 +1200, Antonio Broughton wrote:
Hi,
I am interested in providing more JBoss packages for Ubuntu.
I have found there are some library packages, however, this does not
offer a complete JBoss (AS?) package.
I have started a wiki page at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JBoss if
On 2008-04-17 10:25:27 +0200, Stephan Hermann wrote:
Priority 1a:
I think our main focus should still be to fix
Universe/Multiverse packages for the actual development
release. That means, merging, syncing, fixing packages which we
are importing from Debian or from
On 2008-04-04 10:51:45 +0200, Stephan Hermann wrote:
MOTU itself came from an internal joke from former times, but right
now, the real team is name's ubuntu-dev, and internally addressed as
Ubuntu Universe Developers.
New MOTUs are added to the ~motu team. ~ubuntu-dev is Ubuntu
Development
On 2008-03-16 18:44:47 +, James Westby wrote:
Hello,
I would appreciate it if an experienced person would
offer to hang around and help me out when I can't answer
a question.
As I have done some work on the FTBFS list during hardy,
I'll try to be around and help out.
Ping me on IRC if I
On 2008-02-14 12:05:18 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Up through Alpha 6, if a MOTU believes upload of a new upstream release that
just has bug fixes in it is warranted, they may upload it. File a bug in LP
with the upstream change log entries in it and mark it fix released when the
upload
On 2008-02-14 22:11:29 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Another option I'm thinking which would be in the middle of having to do some
paperwork when it shouldn't be necessary and not thinking about it or not
checking it is to listen all the changes from upstream NEWS or ChangeLog (if
the
On 2008-01-30 16:52:36 +0100, Bjorn Heesakkers wrote:
Op Wednesday 30 January 2008 15:06:18 schreef Michael Bienia:
The transmission backport for gutsy is currently partly published: amd64
has already 1.00-1~gutsy1 but i386 is still at 0.93.dfsg-2~gutsy1.
The missing transmission packages
On 2008-01-16 19:57:33 +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote:
Am Sonntag 13 Januar 2008 17:13:12 schrieb Stefan Potyra:
P.S.: Before starting, haskell-utils and haskell-devscripts need to be
synced from unstable, but I guess that this will happen very soon (bug
#182505 and bug #182522).
Both are
On 2007-11-08 18:52:19 +0100, Christian Westgaard wrote:
Any plans to include a uudeview-dev package into the ubuntu repo?
klibido source requires uudeview.h
According to packages.ubuntu.com /usr/include/uudeview.h is included in
the libuu-dev package.
Michael
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
On 2007-10-28 20:25:35 +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote:
Welcome Søren and Michael! Maybe you could write a short introduction about
you?
Sure.
My name is Michael Bienia (irc nick: geser) and I'm turning 28 soon.
I became a MOTU almost a year ago.
I hope to be a good replacement for the retiring
On 2007-10-31 15:26:04 +1100, William Grant wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 12:37 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
[snip]
In past releases, we have used multidistrotools (10) for this.
The last URL I had appears to be down: would anyone be willing to host
this?
That was, IIRC, running on
On 2007-10-31 12:37:28 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
Hardy should have no Not Built from Source, Failed To Build From
Source, or Outdated packages:
What should happen to packages which still depend on packages in the NBS
list? See e.g. sear now (stuck in 6 lib package transitions) and IIRC
FTBFS
On 2007-10-23 18:05:31 +0200, Michael Bienia wrote:
On 2007-10-23 10:19:51 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
As promised when we decided to go ahead with uploads to gutsy-proposed
before
hardy was open, here is the list of uploads that need to go into Hardy to
catch up. Please reply
: 0.9.12-0ubuntu1.1
Distribution: gutsy-proposed
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers ubuntu-motu at lists.ubuntu.com
Changed-By: Michael Bienia geser at ubuntu.com
Michael
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https
On 2007-10-23 15:20:55 +1000, Sarah Hobbs wrote:
Michael, what in hell were you thinking?
I was contacted by GNUmed upstream about that problem with the
gnumed-client package in gutsy. I wanted to help them get the package
working again.
But I see now that the way I did it was wrong and
An updated version of gtk2hs is available in gutsy-proposed for testing.
To test it, please add the following line to your sources.list:
deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ gutsy-proposed universe
Please provide feedback to https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129050
The current version of gtk2hs
On 2007-08-17 16:50:27 -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
For simba, I did something like this in the simba.postinst:
# Check if mysqlserver is running
if [ -e /var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock ]; then
...
else
echo W: Database server does not appear to be running!
echo W: Please try
On 2007-08-11 11:54:13 +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
I've just packaged tesseract-ocr-2.0 and uploaded it, but I get the
message at the bottom of the mail. Is the problem that I imported my
GPG key to Launchpad only yesterday and the REVU keyring hasn't yet
been synced, or something else?
On 2007-07-26 13:15:00 +0200, Stephan Henningsen wrote:
Could you please update the worker package with a recent version and
compile it with UTF8 support? That would be splendid, as right now UTF8
chars are displayed malformed, and I think this is the last program, that I
use, that hasn't
On 2007-07-15 07:37:12 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
As a result of this, I am now uncertain whether to prefer
something as part of the package, or as a launchpad whiteboard.
Personally, I believe my workflow would be simplified for notes within
the package, but downloading source is a low
On 2007-07-15 17:45:37 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:20:16 +0200 Michael Bienia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't know what the best solution for this but it should work for both
main and universe packages easily.
Personally all these option seem FAR more complex
On 2007-06-27 04:57:58 -0500, Tom Marble wrote:
The reason an SRU may still make sense here is that currently the
version in feisty (0.59):
http://packages.ubuntu.com/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=namessubword=1version=feistyrelease=allkeywords=netbeanssourceid=mozilla-search
Is the
On 2007-06-02 12:05:31 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Debian php5 source package ships three binary packages which lie in
Universe: php5-interbase, php5-imap and php5-mcrypt. They depend on
packages present in Universe (firebird2-dev, libc-client-dev and
libmcrypt-dev respectively), so they can
On 2007-06-14 18:10:07 +0200, Loïc Martin wrote:
I can see new libxvidcore4 packages at
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/multiverse/x/xvidcore/
However, they don't appear in Feisty's repositories, nor do they appear
after a search in http://packages.ubuntu.com/feisty/libs/libxvidcore4
On 2007-03-13 12:29:36 -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
Couple of quick questions. Should we take the time to remove the
binaries from the source packages for mod-bt and php-clamavlib?
Already done for mod-bt and php-clamavlib. Currently I going through the
remaining source packages providing
On 2007-02-22 08:03:55 +1100, Luke Yelavich wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 06:15:28AM EST, Martin Pitt wrote:
However, there are currently 13 packages that still depend on php4
packages (like libapache2-mod-php4). If noone cares for them, they
will be removed along with php4, but a few of
On 2006-12-12 20:03:37 +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote:
2. proposal: Next Wednesday, 12/20/06, 22.00 UTC
Wednesday please
Michael
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
On 2006-11-12 11:24:38 +0100, Andreas Volz wrote:
Ok, I looked into
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt
but found no virtual package for glut. So what is the exact name for
the virtual glut package and how could I get a recent list?
Looking through
69 matches
Mail list logo
