On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 08:53:33PM +, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 13:16 -0700, Brian Murray wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 09:59:54PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > > Brian Murray wrote:
> > > > I've recently been looking at bugs with patches and ran across
> > >
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 13:16 -0700, Brian Murray wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 09:59:54PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > Brian Murray wrote:
> > > I've recently been looking at bugs with patches and ran across
> > > http://launchpad.net/bugs/333835 which seemed easy enough to incorporat
I've recently been looking at bugs with patches and ran across
http://launchpad.net/bugs/333835 which seemed easy enough to incorporate
and a worthwhile fix for Jaunty. However, I ran into a problem trying
to get the existing patches in mc to apply and adding that particular
patch. Is anyone fami
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 13:16 -0700, Brian Murray wrote:
> Maybe I should have elaborated a bit more. While it uses quilt
> executing 'quilt push -a' fails with the message 'No patches in series'.
> Additionally, the structure of the debian/patches directory seemed a bit
> odd to me:
>
> all.series
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 09:59:54PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Brian Murray wrote:
> > I've recently been looking at bugs with patches and ran across
> > http://launchpad.net/bugs/333835 which seemed easy enough to incorporate
> > and a worthwhile fix for Jaunty. However, I ran into a p
Brian Murray wrote:
> I've recently been looking at bugs with patches and ran across
> http://launchpad.net/bugs/333835 which seemed easy enough to incorporate
> and a worthwhile fix for Jaunty. However, I ran into a problem trying
> to get the existing patches in mc to apply and adding that parti