Re: patches to wesnoth, or rather general issue with substvar handling

2007-10-24 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi! First of all, thanks for the fast response, clearly appreciated. Sometimes I wish some of my upstreams would be as responsive as this downstream. ;) * Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-23 19:12:49 CEST]: At one point in the past, libsdl-*1.2-dev packages didn't

Re: patches to wesnoth, or rather general issue with substvar handling

2007-10-24 Thread Sarah Hobbs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This thing propably won't need to get fixed for wesnoth because I plan to introduce the wesnoth-all package in Debian too, suggested by upstream (never heard anything about it from any MOTU that this patch is hanging in there, though, which I

Re: patches to wesnoth, or rather general issue with substvar handling

2007-10-24 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Sarah Hobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-24 13:46:27 CEST]: This thing propably won't need to get fixed for wesnoth because I plan to introduce the wesnoth-all package in Debian too, suggested by upstream (never heard anything about it from any MOTU that this patch is hanging in there,

Re: patches to wesnoth, or rather general issue with substvar handling

2007-10-24 Thread Sarah Hobbs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerfried Fuchs wrote: Yes. And do you know about that from my part having to go look there for every single package every once in a while to see if there is something new is a quite broken approach, when having some amount of packages, especially

Re: patches to wesnoth, or rather general issue with substvar handling

2007-10-24 Thread Siegfried-Angel
2007/10/24, Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED]: And do you know about that from my part having to go look there for every single package every once in a while to see if there is something new is a quite broken approach Long term in my opinion this looks indeed broken to me, but not the fact that

Re: patches to wesnoth, or rather general issue with substvar handling

2007-10-24 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Sarah Hobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-24 14:12:39 CEST]: Sheesh. Was just a suggestion. It wasn't a You must do this, or else. No need to start getting antagonistic at me. Sheesh, sorry for have you hit on your wrong foot. It wasn't a I deny to do so, so no need to get pouting at me. It

Re: patches to wesnoth, or rather general issue with substvar handling

2007-10-24 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Gerfried Fuchs wrote: Hi! First of all, thanks for the fast response, clearly appreciated. Sometimes I wish some of my upstreams would be as responsive as this downstream. ;) * Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-23 19:12:49 CEST]: At one point in the past,

Re: patches to wesnoth, or rather general issue with substvar handling

2007-10-23 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Gerfried Fuchs wrote: Hi! [going as Bcc to the MOTUs which are listed in the changelog of wesnoth explicitly] I just recently gone through the MOTU patches of wesnoth again, and noticed one thing that looks pretty strange to me and one thing that is just wrong and should get