Hi, this is Alberto; who is currently coordinating Ubuntu papercuts quality.
I wanted to bring up a topic which I have been thinking about five
months from now, and after speaking with the appropriate people and
deliberating about it; I conclude it really needs to change.
Canonical
Stephen M. Webb:
I think you will find that there is no conflict between any vaguely
defined social contract and the requirements for acceptable code
submission to a software project.
That social contract is http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt.
David Alan Gilbert:
I don't think any reading
Stephen M. Webb:
That social contract is http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt.
Stephen M. Webb:
The GPL is not a social contract, it is a legal agreement defining
the terms of use and distribution of a work of software.
I thought it would be well understood written that way, but I can be
Hi!
Do you know how could I join (https://launchpad.net/~motu)?
If you want to know I have been a long time contributor to Ubuntu, and I
have coordinated its papercuts quality assurance and prioritised most of
its bugs since 2011.
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/One%20Hundred%20Papercuts)
Also
Robie Basak:
Formally, you apply to the DMB.
Thanks, I would have a look at what's more interesting for this case.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
