Re: [Ubuntu-phone] CyanogenMod Version

2015-04-08 Thread Vladislav Evgeniev
OK, but what if the device is not present in the AOSP tree? On Apr 8, 2015 9:28 AM, Rodney Dawes rodney.da...@canonical.com wrote: Ports are based on AOSP, and not CM. You shouldn't use CM at all, but AOSP, and the AOSP device support tree provided by the manufacturer. On Wed, 2015-04-08 at

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] CyanogenMod Version

2015-04-08 Thread Rodney Dawes
Ports are based on AOSP, and not CM. You shouldn't use CM at all, but AOSP, and the AOSP device support tree provided by the manufacturer. On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 13:04 +, Nkansah Rexford wrote: I think that should be CM 11 because the porting requires android 4.4.2 and cm 11 is 4.4 Does

[Ubuntu-phone] CyanogenMod Version

2015-04-08 Thread Vladislav Evgeniev
Hello, For ports, based on CyanogenMod, which CyanogenMod version should be used? Thanks, Vladislav -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help :

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] CyanogenMod Version

2015-04-08 Thread Nkansah Rexford
I think that should be CM 11 because the porting requires android 4.4.2 and cm 11 is 4.4 Does the '.2' at the end of 4.4.2 strictly matters for the porting to work? Rexford khophi.co On Apr 8, 2015 1:00 PM, Vladislav Evgeniev v.evgen...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, For ports, based on CyanogenMod,

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] CyanogenMod Version

2015-04-08 Thread Sergio Schvezov
On miƩrcoles 8 de abril de 2015 14h'20:01 ART, Vladislav Evgeniev wrote: OK, but what if the device is not present in the AOSP tree? You can use CM, just make sure the component api's match the ones from AOSP so porting is not as complicated; e.g.; hybris is tied to specific android source