Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Freedom

On 7 April 2017 at 11:43, Alan Griffiths wrote: > On 05/04/17 21:51, A. James Lewis wrote: > > I definitely hope the work can be continued as an independent project > > > > Some thoughts on this option: > >http://voices.canonical.com/alan.griffiths/2017/04/07/the- >

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Freedom

On 05/04/17 21:51, A. James Lewis wrote: > I definitely hope the work can be continued as an independent project > Some thoughts on this option: http://voices.canonical.com/alan.griffiths/2017/04/07/the-end-of-a-dream/ -- Alan Griffiths +44 (0)798 9938 758 Octopull Ltd

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Freedom

El día jueves, abril 06, 2017 a las 12:54:49a. m. +0200, Ed Kapitein escribió: > Hi Seth, > > I love your approach to this! > If canonical would give us a kernel and drivers for the hardware, we > could take it from there. > I would need a X driver ( not mir ), a driver for the sound hardware,

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Freedom

Hi, On Thursday, April 6, 2017, Ed Kapitein wrote: > Hi Seth, > > I love your approach to this! > If canonical would give us a kernel and drivers for the hardware, we > could take it from there. > I would need a X driver ( not mir ), a driver for the sound hardware, a > driver for the modem (

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Freedom

On 04/05/2017 11:34 AM, Seth Ciango wrote: > * How difficult would a switch to GNOME be and how long would it take? I'm not sure this is the right path - I'm not sure how much GNOME has for mobile/touch interfaces. I think Qt/QML was the right choice, just not Unity/Mir - which ended up too

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Freedom

This could be the best time to call for Unity! We should stand united  On Thursday, April 6, 2017 8:05:18 AM PHT, Filip Dorosz wrote: Hello all. As we are all dead man walking I'm also interested in continuing what was started here. We must not let the spirit

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Freedom

There are some promising news on that front by Marius Gripsgard. He posted this on google plus: "I'm not giving up! I will do my best to keep Ubuntu touch and Unity8 standing on both it's legs! It will be hard. The Ubuntu touch wheel is still spinning, and it has enough momentum to spin until we

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Freedom

Hello all. As we are all dead man walking I'm also interested in continuing what was started here. We must not let the spirit die! Cheers, Filip. W dniu 05.04.2017 o 20:34, Seth Ciango pisze: This is liberating if we allow it to be. We're no longer forced to be Snap only while tethered to

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Freedom

I'm interested, willing to wait and see what happens. M On 06/04/17 04:34, Seth Ciango wrote: This is liberating if we allow it to be. We're no longer forced to be Snap only while tethered to Unity8. We finally have control over the future of this project. The developer team needs to speak

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Freedom

Hi Seth, I love your approach to this! If canonical would give us a kernel and drivers for the hardware, we could take it from there. I would need a X driver ( not mir ), a driver for the sound hardware, a driver for the modem ( serial + AT commands ? ) and drivers for the other parts. (

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Freedom

I hope for that as well! I'm prepared to contribute my share. On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:51 PM A. James Lewis wrote: > I definitely hope the work can be continued as an independent project > > On 05/04/17 19:34, Seth Ciango wrote: > > This is liberating if we allow it to

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Freedom

Unity OS? On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:22 PM Kristijan Žic wrote: > I hope for that as well! I'm prepared to contribute my share. > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:51 PM A. James Lewis wrote: > >> I definitely hope the work can be continued as an independent

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Freedom

I definitely hope the work can be continued as an independent project On 05/04/17 19:34, Seth Ciango wrote: This is liberating if we allow it to be. We're no longer forced to be Snap only while tethered to Unity8. We finally have control over the future of this project. The developer team

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Freedom Box and Syncing

I like snappy ubuntu (from the little I have learned) I like porta-box things, though I've heard that some boxes are 'more free' than others but that's not a focused discussion for this email list. I like how amazing owncloud works... Based on everything here, it would seem logical to have, and

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Freedom Box and Syncing

El 07/04/16 a las 07:51, Oliver Grawert escribió: > hi, > Am Mittwoch, den 06.04.2016, 05:29 -0700 schrieb Wayne Taylor: >> Just a quick thought: >> >> I've always imagined a free version of a Pogoplug to solve the whole >> sync discussion with ubuntu phone. >> >>

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Freedom Box and Syncing

hi, Am Mittwoch, den 06.04.2016, 05:29 -0700 schrieb Wayne Taylor: > Just a quick thought: > > I've always imagined a free version of a Pogoplug to solve the whole > sync discussion with ubuntu phone. > > http://freedomboxfoundation.org/ > > Something like Owncloud running on one of these that

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Freedom Box and Syncing

The Enigma box is actually such a solution: ownCloud is available pre-installed. - https://en.enigmabox.net/ Peter 2016-04-06 14:29 GMT+02:00 Wayne Taylor : > Just a quick thought: > > I've always imagined a free version of a Pogoplug to solve the whole > sync discussion

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Freedom Box and Syncing

Just a quick thought: I've always imagined a free version of a Pogoplug to solve the whole sync discussion with ubuntu phone. http://freedomboxfoundation.org/ Something like Owncloud running on one of these that just kind of 'works' with low power. Syncs up your photos, videos, contacts,