Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Meizu MX4 OT11 - continual pocket dial

2016-07-12 Thread Bob Summerwill
No, Andrea, I don't get the double-tap "feature". Perhaps it is just that the on-off button (at the top) is in a position which is more prone to be pressed accidentally than on other devices I have had in the past? Many of my devices have had that on the side, rather than the top, and the phone

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] uNav && offline maps on the BQ E4.5

2016-07-12 Thread Matthias Apitz
El d�a Tuesday, July 12, 2016 a las 03:07:40PM +0200, Oliver Grawert escribi�: > hi, > Am Dienstag, den 12.07.2016, 14:54 +0200 schrieb Matthias Apitz: > > I have added a chapter for uNav versiom 0.60 to out booklet: > > https://gurucubano.gitbooks.io/bq-aquaris-e-4-5-ubuntu-phone/content/ > >

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Meizu MX4 OT11 - continual pocket dial

2016-07-12 Thread Andrea Bernabei
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:10 AM, Bob Summerwill wrote: > Is anybody else suffering from pocket dial all the time on the MX4 or > other devices? > > It feels to me as though the touch screen is active even when the display > is off, and that can result in regular pocket dial,

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 11.07.16

2016-07-12 Thread Eran Benjamin
On 12-07-16 00:48, Lukasz Zemczak wrote: Hello everyone, News from a few fronts today, but let's maybe start off with OTA-12: things so far seem to look good with testing of our main devices almost finished. We expect a new device tarball re-spin for turbo and maybe one small custom tarball

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Touch problems on MX4

2016-07-12 Thread Ronny Fuchs
I know... I had this problem twice in the morning. Has everyone an idea, which log-file can help for analysis? Thanks, Ronny Am Montag, 11. Juli 2016 14:55:10 CEST schrieb Mathijs Veen : That looks bad. Is this stable channel and latest release? If you're not sure

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 11.07.16

2016-07-12 Thread Leonardo "LeartS" Donelli
On 12 July 2016 at 00:48, Lukasz Zemczak wrote: > Last topic for today is the general concept of our future feature > communication. We know some of you would like to know more about what > we're working on currently to be able to anticipate better what to > expect