Hi there
Dave Walker wrote:
> ... Personally i'm finding it quite
> tricky to think of things that perhaps a novice server user would find
> useful, and i suspect the rest of you will agree. Many of the tips seem
> "obvious", until you actually think about them.
Some thoughts to try and grow th
Hi,
The next Ubuntu Server Meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, August 18th,
15:00 UTC in #ubuntu-meeting.
If there are any discussion points or items for decision that you would
like to add to the agenda [1], add an item to it and begin preparations
to present a short introduction to the topic on #
Hi Brazen,
Right you are, that was not an appropriate example. I meant that all
virtual host under the /var/www has to be owned by the same user and
group www-data in case if you have only one user to manage many virtual
hosts. www-data as an owner of root directory is not a secure option.
Sas
Hi Dave,
Just finished the Russian translations. There is also a typo in the tip #24:
"Ubuntu Server Tip: Use "pastebinit" _top_ copy a file, or output of a
command to a webpage allowing you to share it with others. e.g.
"pastebinit /proc/cpuinfo" or "df -h | pastebinit""
s/top/to/g
Regards,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Alexander Kraev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It depends on web-server architecture and how many sites you are going
> to run inside /var/www.
>
> root:root is good for /var/www if you are running many sites in
> /var/www. Let's say:
>
> /var/www/example.org
> /var/www/exampl
Hi,
It depends on web-server architecture and how many sites you are going
to run inside /var/www.
root:root is good for /var/www if you are running many sites in
/var/www. Let's say:
/var/www/example.org
/var/www/example.net
/var/www/sub.example.org
Each of these directory has to be owned as
I've found putting the web root in user space preferable to /var/www. Since
many users have multiple websites I place each web tree under
/home/user/public_html.
Still leaves rafts of security question for which I find no complete
solution other than virtual private web servers but if I remove she
IMHO I feel that the current permissions of root:root 755 are
sufficient. Should a user/application have specific requirements then
this can be easily changed.
Regards,
Charles Hooper
Giorgio Zarrelli wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> better would be to let the subdir under /var/www to be owned by
> user.apa
Hi,
better would be to let the subdir under /var/www to be owned by
user.apachegoup and set to 755.
This way, each user can manage his contents and apache can only read them and
show their contents to visitors.
Giorgio
Il Monday 17 August 2009 14:18:38 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk ha scritto:
> On 17
On 17. aug.. 2009, at 13.43, Armindo Silva wrote:
> Shouldn't be owned by www-data so apache can write there?
No. Allowing the apache user to change or delete its website is no
good and allows for much easier hacking/defacing the site(s) on the
box. If the apache user cannot write to /var/ww
Dave Walker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As blogged [0], we really need some more Ubuntu Server Tips for
> inclusion in the ubuntu-server-tips project. I won't repeat the
> contents of the blog post, but if anyone has any useful tips - raising a
> bug would be highly appreciated.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Dave Walk
Shouldn't be owned by www-data so apache can write there?
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:06 PM, James Dinkel wrote:
> 755 owned by root.root
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Michael S. Mason wrote:
>
>> Hello Community Team:
>>
>> What is the default permissions for /var/www (?)
>>
>> Should t
12 matches
Mail list logo
