Am Mi, 9.02.2011, 13:41 schrieb Tapas Mishra:
...
> Ok I have posted this problem here
> and followed completely
> https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/144560
> seems it has worked.
> Waiting for the last messages.
> This seems to be a bug in in dbus as explained here
> https://bugs.laun
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Michael Zoet wrote:
>
> Am Di, 8.02.2011, 19:38 schrieb Tapas Mishra:
> ...
>>>
>> Michael thanks for your message.I do not want to do any more
>> experiment on my system.
>> I do have an old backup with all old copies which is about 15-20 days
>> old with an old ke
Am Di, 8.02.2011, 19:38 schrieb Tapas Mishra:
...
>>
> Michael thanks for your message.I do not want to do any more
> experiment on my system.
> I do have an old backup with all old copies which is about 15-20 days
> old with an old kernel.
> Right now every thing on my server is working perfectly
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Michael Zoet wrote:
>
> Am Di, 8.02.2011, 13:39 schrieb Tapas Mishra:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>> (2) What did you do to get into this situation?
>> I do an aptitude safe-upgrade (which should just install the latest
>> packages of same release I do not want to change version of
Am Di, 8.02.2011, 13:39 schrieb Tapas Mishra:
>
>
>
>> (2) What did you do to get into this situation?
> I do an aptitude safe-upgrade (which should just install the latest
> packages of same release I do not want to change version of OS)
>
I think you misunderstood the use of safe-upgrade! A no
I would reboot this server. If it does not help, try to do some hardware
tests (memory, CPU, disks, etc.).
--
Maciej Korzeń
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Carsten Aulbert
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tuesday 08 February 2011 11:29:00 Tapas Mishra wrote:
>>
>> I have searched this problem but I am not able to understand what to
>> do in this situation.
>
> I think to find out you need to generate the "correct" error message.
>
>
Hi
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 11:29:00 Tapas Mishra wrote:
>
> I have searched this problem but I am not able to understand what to
> do in this situation.
I think to find out you need to generate the "correct" error message.
List of questions:
(1) What apt sources are you using? (/etc/apt/so
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Michael Zoet wrote:
>
> Am Di, 8.02.2011, 10:56 schrieb Tapas Mishra:
> ...
>>
>>
>> I did as you said here and then again did aptitude safe-upgrade things
>> finished with some errrors,
>
> Why are you doing a safe-upgrade!!! In previous mails you should have
>
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Carsten Aulbert
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tuesday 08 February 2011 11:13:50 Michael Zoet wrote:
>
>> Nothing of that! Tapas needs first to fix his package dependency problems!
>> libvirt does not work because there are some unresolved package
>> dependencies...
>
> sh** I
Hi
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 11:13:50 Michael Zoet wrote:
> Nothing of that! Tapas needs first to fix his package dependency problems!
> libvirt does not work because there are some unresolved package
> dependencies...
sh** I should have read the error message properly.
Question remains what
Am Di, 8.02.2011, 11:01 schrieb Carsten Aulbert:
> Hi
>
> On Tuesday 08 February 2011 10:56:31 Tapas Mishra wrote:
>
>> The unfortunate part is all the Virtual Machines running on it are
>> production machines.
>> So this really needs to be resolved.
>
> and now I'm probably not being of much help
Am Di, 8.02.2011, 10:56 schrieb Tapas Mishra:
...
>
>
> I did as you said here and then again did aptitude safe-upgrade things
> finished with some errrors,
Why are you doing a safe-upgrade!!! In previous mails you should have
realized that safe-upgrade is sometimes a bad choice! Do not use i
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Carsten Aulbert
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tuesday 08 February 2011 10:56:31 Tapas Mishra wrote:
>
>> The unfortunate part is all the Virtual Machines running on it are
>> production machines.
>> So this really needs to be resolved.
>
> and now I'm probably not being of muc
Hi
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 10:56:31 Tapas Mishra wrote:
> The unfortunate part is all the Virtual Machines running on it are
> production machines.
> So this really needs to be resolved.
and now I'm probably not being of much help anymore as I've never user virt-
manager in production, only
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Carsten Aulbert
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tuesday 08 February 2011 10:46:09 Tapas Mishra wrote:
>>
>> Yes this does work for me and I have the file with me.
>> But where do I put it?
>>
>
> /var/cache/apt/archives
>
> Cheers
>
> Carsten
>
I did as you said here and then
Hi
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 10:46:09 Tapas Mishra wrote:
>
> Yes this does work for me and I have the file with me.
> But where do I put it?
>
/var/cache/apt/archives
Cheers
Carsten
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubu
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Carsten Aulbert
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tuesday 08 February 2011 10:28:45 Tapas Mishra wrote:
>> Like this the above output grows till I got 70th time
>> Get:70 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main
>> openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b20-1.9.5-0ubuntu1~10.04.1
Hi
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 10:28:45 Tapas Mishra wrote:
> Like this the above output grows till I got 70th time
> Get:70 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main
> openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b20-1.9.5-0ubuntu1~10.04.1 [25.6MB]
> then I had to forcefully stop the update from happeni
I logged in as root on a server of mine and did aptitude saf-upgrade
>From one hour I am seeing the server is just doing an openjdk update
and after installing it ,it starts downloading that again and keeps on
doing
I have no idea as what has caused this error.
aptitude safe-upgrade
Reading pack
20 matches
Mail list logo
